[André, M.-F. 1998. Depopulation, land-use change and landscape transformation in the French Massif Central. Ambio, 27 (4), 351–353.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ansink, E., Hein, L., Hasund, K.P. 2008. To value functions or services? An analysis of ecosystem valuation approaches. Environmental Values, 17 (4), 489–503.10.3197/096327108X368502]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barrena, J., Nahuelhual, L., Báez, A., Schiappacasse, I., Cerda, C. 2014. Valuing cultural ecosystem services: Agricultural heritage in Chiloé island, southern Chile. Ecosystem Services, 7, 66–75. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.005.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brukas, V., Jellesmark Thorsen, B., Helles, F., Tarp, P. 2001. Discount rate and harvest policy: implications for Baltic forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 2 (2), 143–156. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00050-8.10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00050-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Calish, S., Fight, R.D., Teeguarden, D.E. 1978. How do nontimber values affect Douglas-fir rotations? Journal of Forestry, 76 (4), 217–221.10.1093/jof/76.4.217]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, E.T., Tilley, D.R. 2014. The eco-price: How environmental emergy equates to currency. Ecosystem Services, 7, 128–140. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.002.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Centemeri, L. 2015. Reframing Problems of Incommensurability in Environmental Conflicts Through Pragmatic Sociology: From Value Pluralism to the Plurality of Modes of Engagement with the Environment. Environmental Values, 24 (3), 299–320. http://doi.org/10.3197/096327114X13947900181158.10.3197/096327114X13947900181158]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chang, S. 1983. Rotation age, management intensity, and the economic factors of timber production: do changes in stumpage price, interest rate, regeneration cost, and forest taxation matter? Forest Science, 29, 267–277.Clark, C.W. 1973. The economics of overexploitation. Science, 181 (4100), 630–634.10.1126/science.181.4100.630]Search in Google Scholar
[Costanza, R. 2002. New editor for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 42 (3), 351–352. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00178-7.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00178-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crocker, T.D. 2002. A short history of environmental and resource economics. In: Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics (ed.: J.C.J.M. van den Bergh). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 32–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deng, H., Zheng, P., Liu, T., Liu, X. 2011. Forest Ecosystem Services and Eco-Compensation Mechanisms in China. Environmental Management, 48 (6), 1079–1085. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9742-0.10.1007/s00267-011-9742-021882001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Doherty, E., Murphy, G., Hynes, S., Buckley, C. 2014. Valuing ecosystem services across water bodies: Results from a discrete choice experiment. Ecosystem Services, 7, 89–97. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.003.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Endres, M. 1919. Lehrbuch der Waldwertrechnung. Forststatic, 3.10.1007/978-3-662-42400-1_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Farley, J., Costanza, R. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological Economics, 69 (11), 2060–2068.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Faustmann, M. 1849. Berechnung des Wertes welchen Waldboden sowie noch nicht haubare Holzbestände für die Waldwirtschaft besitzen. Allgemeine Forst-Und Jagd-Zeitung, 15 (1849), 7–44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster, D.R. 1992. Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New-England, USA. Journal of Ecology, 80 (4), 753–772. http://doi.org/10.2307/2260864.10.2307/2260864]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gaffney, M. 2008. Keeping land in capital theory – Ricardo, Faustmann, Wicksell, and George. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67 (1), 119–141. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00562.x.10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00562.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gan, J., Kolison, S.H., Colletti, J.P. 2001. Optimal forest stock and harvest with valuing non-timber benefits: a case of US coniferous forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 2 (2), 167–178. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00051-X.10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00051-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Garcia-Llorente, M., Martin-López, B., Diiaz, S., Montes, C. 2011. Can ecosystem properties be fully translated into service values? An economic valuation of aquatic plant services. Ecological Applications, 21 (8), 3083–3103.10.1890/10-1744.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartman, R. 1976. The harvesting decision whena standing forest has valuea. Economic Inquiry, 14 (1), 52–58.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00377.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Holland, A. 2011. What do we do about bleakness? Environmental Values, 20 (3), 315–321.10.3197/096327111X13077055165947]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kaffashi, S., Shamsudin, M.N., Radam, A., Rahim, K.A., Yacob, M.R., Muda, A., Yazid, M. 2011. Economic valuation of Shadegan International Wetland, Iran: notes for conservation. Regional Environmental Change, 11 (4), 925–934. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0225-x.10.1007/s10113-011-0225-x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I. 2001. Sustainability science. Science, 292 (5517), 641–642.10.1126/science.1059386]Search in Google Scholar
[Lehr, J., Borggreve, B. 1879. Die Forstreinertragslehre, insbesondere die sog. forstliche Statik Prof. Dr. G. Heyers nach ihrer wissenschaftlichen Nichtigkeit und wirthschaftlichen Gefährlichkeit Oberförster in Bonn, Lehrer der Forstwissenschaft an der mit der Universität Bonn v. JSTOR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lowry, S.T. 1965. The Classical Greek Theory of Natural Resource Economics. Land Economics, 41 (3), 203–208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3144852.10.2307/3144852]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Luo, D., Zhang, W. 2014. A comparison of Markov model-based methods for predicting the ecosystem service value of land use in Wuhan, central China. Ecosystem Services, 7, 57–65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.001.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Manley, B., Bare, B.B. 2001. Computing maximum willingness to pay with Faustmann’s formula: some special situations from New Zealand. Forest Policy and Economics, 2 (2), 179–193. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00044-2.10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00044-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Martin, H. 2013. Die forstliche Statik: Ein Handbuch für leitende und ausführende Forstwirte sowie zum Studium und Unterricht. Springer-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinez-Alier, J. 2001. Mining conflicts, environmental justice, and valuation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86 (1), 153–170.10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00252-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G.,O’Neill, J. 1998. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26 (3), 277–286.10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00120-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mather, A.S. 1992. The forest transition. Area, 24, 367–379.10.1016/0010-4485(92)90063-G]Search in Google Scholar
[Mather, A.S., Needle, C.L. 1998. The forest transition: a theoretical basis. Area, 30 (2), 117–124.10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00055.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mcconnell, K.E., Daberkow, J.N., Hardie, I.W. 1983. Planning timber production with evolving prices and costs. Land Economics, 59 (3), 292–299. http://doi.org/10.2307/3145731.10.2307/3145731]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Möhring, B. 2001. The German struggle between the “Bodenreinertragslehre” (land rent theory) and “Waldreinertragslehre” (theory of the highest revenue) belongs to the past — but what is left? Forest Policy and Economics, 2 (2), 195–201. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00049-1.10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00049-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Molenda, T. 1945. Wycenianie nieruchomości leśnych w ekonomii i w technice. Koło Leśników UP Poznań.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newman, D.H., Gilbert, C.B., Hyde, W.F. 1985. The optimal forest rotation with evolving prices. Land Economics, 61 (4), 347–353.10.2307/3146152]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nördlinger, J.S. 1805. Versuch den Werth der Waldungen zu bestimmen. Diana, 3, 363–400.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearce, D.W., Seccombe-Hett, T. 2000. Economic valuation and environmental decision-making in Europe. Environmental Science and Technology, 34 (8), 1419–1425.10.1021/es9906711]Search in Google Scholar
[Piekutin, J., Skreta, M. 2012. Ekonomiczny wiek rębności drzewostanów sosnowych. Sylwan, 156 (10), 741–749.]Search in Google Scholar
[Płotkowski, L. 2010. Gospodarka leśna w badaniach ekonomiki leśnictwa. Rocznik Nauk Rolniczych, Seria G, 97, 110–120.10.22630/RNR.2010.97.2.21]Search in Google Scholar
[Podgórski, M., Kikayi, R.P. 1996. Próba określenia produkcyjności i produktywności lasu za pomocą wskaźników technicznych i ekonomicznych, na przykładzie nadleśnictw Regionalnej Dyrekcji Lasów Państwowych w Szczecinie. Prace Komisji Nauk Rolniczych i Komisji Nauk Leśnych. Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk, 82, 125–133.]Search in Google Scholar
[Price, C. 1987. Environmental benefits and optimal rotation: Comment on Johansson and Loefgren. Journal of Environmental Management, 25 (3), 215–218.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramsey, F.P. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. The Economic Journal, 38 (152), 543–559.10.2307/2224098]Search in Google Scholar
[Riebel, F. 1905. Die Wertermittlung der Obstbäume und anderer Einzelbäume. Fromme, 88 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rudel, T.K., Coomes, O.T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., Lambin, E. 2005. Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change, 15 (1), 23–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Shapiro, J., Báldi, A. 2014. Accurate accounting: How to balance ecosystem services and disservices. Ecosystem Services, 7, 201–202. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.01.002.10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.01.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Shaw, M.R., Pendleton, L., Cameron, D.R., Morris, B., Bachelet, D., Klausmeyer, K., Roehrdanz, P.R. 2011. The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services. Climatic Change, 109 (1), 465–484. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0313-4.10.1007/s10584-011-0313-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Spangenberg, J.H., Settele, J. 2016. Value pluralism and economic valuation – defendable if well done. Ecosystem Services, 18, 100–109. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.008.10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Staaland, H., Holand, Ø., Nellemann, C., Smith, M. 1998. Time scale for forest regrowth: abandoned grazing and agricultural areas in southern Norway. Ambio, 27, 456–460.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tahvonen, O., Salo, S. 1999. Optimal Forest Rotation within SituPreferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37 (1), 106–128. http://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1055.10.1006/jeem.1998.1055]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Thompson, I.D., Okabe, K., Tylianakis, J.M., Kumar, P., Brockerhoff, E.G., Schellhorn, N.A., Nasi, R. 2011. Forest Biodiversity and the Delivery of Ecosystem Goods and Services: Translating Science into Policy. Bioscience, 61 (12), 972–981. http://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.7.10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vankooten, G.C., Binkley, C.S., Delcourt, G. 1995. Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77 (2), 365–374. http://doi.org/10.2307/1243546.10.2307/1243546]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Viitala, E.-J. 2016. Faustmann formula before Faustmann in German territorial states. Forest Policy and Economics, 65, 47–58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.004.10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zając, S., Świętojański, A. 2002. Podstawy metodyczne wyceny lasu. Sylwan, 3 (146), 5–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zydroń, A., Szafrański, C., Korytowski, M. 2012. Koncepcje określania wysokości leśnej stopy procentowej. Sylwan, 156 (5), 333–342.]Search in Google Scholar