1. bookVolume 9 (2021): Edizione 1 (October 2021)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2303-4858
Prima pubblicazione
08 Sep 2014
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

An analysis of lexicogrammatical development in English textbooks in Turkey: A usage-based construction grammar approach

Pubblicato online: 08 Mar 2022
Volume & Edizione: Volume 9 (2021) - Edizione 1 (October 2021)
Pagine: 26 - 55
Ricevuto: 25 Oct 2021
Accettato: 15 Dec 2021
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2303-4858
Prima pubblicazione
08 Sep 2014
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Arıkan, Arda (2005). Age, gender and social class in ELT coursebooks: A critical study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28: 29–38.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald, Petar Milin, Michael Ramscar (2016). Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiology 30(11): 1174–1220.Search in Google Scholar

Bencini, Giulia M.L, Adele E. Goldberg (2000). The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43(4): 640–651.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray, Kornwipa Poonpon (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5–35.10.5054/tq.2011.244483Search in Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald, Michael McCarthy (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English: a Comprehensive Guide; Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Franklin, Kathryn Bock, Adele E. Goldberg (2003). Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? Cognition 90(1): 29–49.10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00123-9Search in Google Scholar

Chater, Nick, Christopher D. Manning (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(7): 335–344.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jack (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Coşkun, Abdullah (2016). Causes of the ‘I can understand English but I can’t speak’ syndrome in Turkey. I-Manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 6(3): 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark (2010). The corpus of contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25(4): 447–464.Search in Google Scholar

Demir Yusuf, Mustafa Yavuz (2017). Do ELT coursebooks still suffer from gender inequalities? A case study from Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 13(1): 103–122.Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger (2016). Frequency and lexical specificity in grammar: A critical review. In Behrens Heike, Stefan Pfänder, eds. Experience Counts: Frequency Effects in Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 209–238.10.1515/9783110346916-009Search in Google Scholar

Díez-Bedmar, María Belén, Pascual Pérez-Paredes (2020). Noun phrase complexity in young Spanish EFL learners’ writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25(1): 4–35.Search in Google Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar (2019). Frequency in Language: Memory, Attention and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316084410Search in Google Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar, Catherine Caldwell-Harris L. (2015). Frequency and entrenchment. In Dabrowska Ewa, Dagmar Divjak, eds. Cognitive Linguistics. Foundation of Language. Berlin: De Gruyter, 61–86.10.1515/9783110292022-004Search in Google Scholar

Dolgova, Natalia, Andrea Tyler (2020). Applications of usage-based approaches to language teaching. In Gao Xuesong, ed. Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Manhattan: Springer International Publishing, 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Education First EF English Proficiency Index (EPI). A ranking of 100 countries and regions by English skills.https://www.ef.com.tr/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/legacy/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v10/ef-epi-2020-english.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. SSLA. 24: 143–188.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 92.2: 232–249.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C., Fernando Ferreira-Junior (2009a). Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7(1): 188–221. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.08ell10.1075/arcl.7.08ellSearch in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C., Fernando Ferreira-Junior (2009b). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal 93(3): 370–385.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.xSearch in Google Scholar

Erarslan, Ali (2019). Factors affecting the implementation of primary school English language teaching programs in Turkey. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning 9(2): 7–22.Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, Ronald Aylmer (1934). Two new properties of mathematical likelihood. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. 144(852): 285–307.Search in Google Scholar

Gedik, Tan Arda, Yağmur Su Kolsal (2022). A corpus-based approach to English university entrance exams and English high school textbooks in Turkey. TAP-SLA 8(1). https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.915210.31261/TAPSLA.9152Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. (2013). Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational verb templates. Mind & Language 28(4): 435–465 https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.1202610.1111/mila.12026Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. (2019). Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E., Devin M. Casenhiser, Nitya Sethuraman (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3): 1613-3641.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E., Thomas Herbst (2021). The nice-of-you construction and its fragments. Linguistics 59(1): 285–318.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Clarence (2019). A multilevel description of textbook linguistic complexity across disciplines: Leveraging NLP to support disciplinary literacy. Linguistics and Education 53: 1-11.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe, Doris Schönefeld (2005). Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4): 635-67610.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th., Stefanie Wulff (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3(1): 182–200.10.1075/arcl.3.10griSearch in Google Scholar

Hare, Mary L, Adele E Goldberg (1999). Structural priming: Purely syntactic? In Proceedings of the twenty first annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Psychology Press, 208–211Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas (2018). Is language a collostructicon? A proposal for looking at collocations, valency, argument structure and other constructions. In Cantos-Gómez Pascual, Moisés Almela-Sánchez, eds. Lexical Collocation Analysis. Manhattan: Springer International, 1–22.10.1007/978-3-319-92582-0_1Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas (2020). Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language: Moving towards colloconstruction. Constructions and Frames 12(1): 56–95.Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher (2016). Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication. Georgia State University. http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/alesl_diss/35/Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher, Scott Crossley (2017). Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing 34(4): 515-535.Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher, Scott Crossley (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal 102(2): 333–349.Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 579–589.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, David, John Swales (2006). A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes 25(1): 56–75.Search in Google Scholar

Lieven, E. V., Julian M. Pine, Gillian Baldwin (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24(1): 187–219.Search in Google Scholar

Madlener, Karin (2016). Input optimization: Effects of type and token frequency manipulations in instructed second language learning. In Behrens Heike, Stefan Pfänder, eds. Experience Counts: Frequency Effects in Language. Berlin: De Gruyter, 133–174. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346916-007.10.1515/9783110346916-007Search in Google Scholar

MEB (2018a). İngilizce öğretim programı ilkokul ve ortaokul. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812411191321-%C4%B0NG%C4%B0L%C4%B0ZCE%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%20Klas%C3%B6r%C3%BC.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

MEB (2018b). Ortaöğretim İngilizce dersi. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=342Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. (2004). Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15.1: 1–67.Search in Google Scholar

Monsell, Stephen (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In Besner Derek, Glyn W. Humphreys, eds. Basic Processes in Reading. London: Routledge, 156–205.Search in Google Scholar

Nakamura, Daisuke (2019). Development of clausal and subclausal grammatical complexity and their relationship to overall length in second language writing over a year. Bulletin of Japan Women’s College of Physical Education 49: 45–57.Search in Google Scholar

Ninio, Anat (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language 26(3): 619–653.Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent (2015). Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.1710.1075/cal.17Search in Google Scholar

Römer, Ute, Audrey Roberson, Matthew B. O’Donnell, Nick C. Ellis (2014). Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions. ICAME Journal 38(1): 115–135.Search in Google Scholar

Römer, Ute, Matthew B O’Donnell, Nick C Ellis (2015). Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions. In Groom Nicholas, Maggie Charles, Suganthi John, eds. Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In Honour of Susan Hunston. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43-72Search in Google Scholar

Seidenberg, Mark S., David C. Plaut (2014). Quasiregularity and its discontents: the legacy of the past tense debate. Cognitive Science 38(6): 1190–1228.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol, Stefan Th Gries (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 8(2): 209–243.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol, Susanne Flach (2018). The corpus-based perspective on entrenchment. In Hans-Jorg Schmid, eds. Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. How we Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 101–127.Search in Google Scholar

Tabachnik, Barbara G., Linda Fidell S. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1–2): 61–82.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wulff, Stefanie, Nick C. Ellis (2018). Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In Miller David, Fatih Bayram, Jason Rothman, Ludovica Serratrice eds. Bilingual Cognition and Language. The State of the Science Across its Subfields. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 37–56.10.1075/sibil.54.03wulSearch in Google Scholar

Yates, F. (1934). Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ 2 test. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1(2): 217-235 https://doi.org/10.2307/298360410.2307/2983604Search in Google Scholar

Yurtsever Bodur, Gözde, Arda Arıkan (2019). Why can’t we learn English?: Students’ opinions at Akdeniz University. Gaziantep University Journal of Educational Sciences 1(1): 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

Zipf, George Kingsley (1935). The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo