[
BIONDI, A., EECKHOUT, P., RIPLEY, S. (eds). EU After Lisbon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 1–456.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case 26/62, NV Algemene Transport—En Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v. Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration, ECLI:EU:C:1963:1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-105/14, Tarrico and Others (Tarrico I), ECLI:EU:C:2015:555.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-14/86, Pretore di Salo v X, ECLI:EU:C:1987:275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-152/84, M.H. Marshall v. Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching), ECLI:EU:C:1986:84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-207/08, Babanov, ECLI:EU:C:2008:407. [online]. Available at: <http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-207/08> Accessed 03.03, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-322/88, Salvatore Grimaldi v. Fonds, ECLI:EU:C:1989:646.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-42/17, M.A.S. and M.B. (Tarrico II), ECLI:EU:C:2017:936.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-467/18, Rayonna prokuratura Lom, ECLI:EU:C:2019:765.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-612/15, Nikolay Kolev and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2018:392.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-80/86, Kolpinghuis Nijmegen BV, ECLI:EU:C:1987:431.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-9/70, Franz Grad v. Finanzamt Traunstein, ECLI:EU:C:1970:78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal 115, 09/05/2008 P. 0047-0388. [online]. Available at: <http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2008/oj> Accessed 23.03.2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Constitutional act of the Republic of Lithuania on membership of The Republic of Lithuania in the European Union, Official Gazette, 2004, No. 111-4123. [online]. Available at: <https://www.lrs.lt/upl_files/Lietuvos_pirmininkavimas_ES/dokumentai/CONSTITUTIONAL_ACT.pdf> Accessed: 23.03.2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Criminal Code of Lithuania. Approved in 2000 September 26 by law no. VIII – 1968. Official Gazette, 2000, No. 89-2741. [online]. Available at: <https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.2B866DFF7D43/asr> Accessed 02.06.2020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2005/60/EC on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing [2005] OJ L 309/15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings [2010] OJ L 280/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2011/99/EU on the European protection order [2011] OJ L 338/2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information in criminal proceedings [2012] OJ L 142/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA [2012] OJ L 315/57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2013/48/EU on the right to access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty [2013] OJ L 294/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2016/1919/EU on legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings [2016] OJ L 297/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2016/343/EU on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings [2016] OJ L 65/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2016/800/EU on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings [2016] OJ L 132/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2019/713 on combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment [2019] OJ L 123/18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ECHR 20 January 2009, Norkūnas v. Lithuania, appl. no. 302/05.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Union, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 18 December 2000, 2000/C 364/01.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GILBERT, E. Supremacy and direct effect: necessary measures? North East Law Review, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 11–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOMBOS, Katalin. Europeanisation Effects in the Court Jurisprudence. International and Comparative Law Review, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 261–275. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0059
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARTLEY, T. C. The Foundations of European Union Law. 7th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 1–570.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HERLIN-KARNELL, E. The Lisbon Treaty and the area of criminal law and justice. European policy analysis. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 1–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HUOMO-KETTUNEN, M. EU criminal policy at a crossroads between effectiveness and traditional restraints for the use of criminal law. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2014, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 301–326.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JARUKAITIS, I. Adoption of the third Constitutional Act and its impact on national constitutional system. Teisė, 2006, vol. 60, pp. 22–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KARAYIGIT, M. T. Are directives directly applicable? Ankara Avrupa Calismalari Dergisi, 2016, vol.15, no. 2, pp. 59–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KETTUNEN, M. Legitimizing European criminal law: Justification and restrictions. Comparative, European & International Criminal Justice 2. Helsinki: Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 1–278.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], May 24, 2011, 2K-239/2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], June 19, 2014, 2K-317/2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], Sept. 30, 2014, 2K-389/2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], Nov. 28, 2019, 2K-281-489/2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], Nov. 26, 2019, 2K-278-697/2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], Dec.17, 2019, 2K-290-489/2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], July 2, 2019, 2K-199-648/2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], May 12, 2015, 2K-242-511/2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], Jan. 12, 2016, 2K-52-942/2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas [LAT] [Supreme Court of Lithuania], Apr. 11, 2019, 2K-7-648/2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MANACORDA, S. The Tarico saga: A risk or an opportunity for European criminal law? New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MIETTINEN, S. Criminal Law and Policy in the European Union. London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 1–248.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MITSILEGAS, V. From overcriminalisation to decriminalisation. The many faces of effectiveness in European criminal law. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2014, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 416–424.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PEREIRA, R. M. Environmental Criminal Liability and Enforcement in European and International Law. Leiden: Brill, 2015, pp. 1–378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation 2018/1805 of November 14, 2018 on mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders [2018] OJ L 303/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SAKALAUSKAS, G., BIKELIS, S., KALPOKAS, V., POCIENĖ, A. Baudžiamoji politika Lietuvoje: tendencijos ir lyginamieji aspektai [Criminal Policy in Lithuania: Trends and Comparative Aspects]. Vilnius: Teisės institutas, 2012, pp. 6–182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SEHNÁLEK, D., STEHLÍK, V. European “Judicial Monologue” of the Czech Constitutional Court – a Critical Review of its Approach to the Preliminary Ruling Procedure. International and Comparative Law Review, 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 181–199. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SOLOVEIČIKAS, D. Europos Sąjungos teisės tiesioginis veikimas ir jos taikymas – dvi skirtingos tapačios doktrinos dalys? [Direct Effect and Application of European Community Law: Two Distinct Parts of the Same Doctrine?]. Jurisprudencija, 2007, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 35–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STEINER, J., WOODS, L. EU Law. 10th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 1–776.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SUOMINEN, A. Effectiveness and functionality of substantive EU criminal law. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2014, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 388–415.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠVEDAS, G., VERŠEKYS, P., LEVON, J., PRAPIESTIS, D. Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo kodekso bendrosios dalies vientisumo ir naujovių (su)derinimo iššūkiai [Challenges in Harmonizing the Integrity and Novelties of the General Part of the Criminal Code]. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press, 2017, pp. 1–321.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Rome, the 25 of March 1957. [online]. Available at: <http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/teec/sign> Accessed 23.03.2020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VERVAELE, J. A. E. European criminal justice in the European and global context. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2019, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 7–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VUKADINOVIC, R. D. The concept and faces of direct effect of European Community law. Review of European Law, 2011, Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
