[
BELL, A., KONTOROVICH, E. Challenging the EU’s Illegal Restrictions on Israeli Products in the World Trade Organization. Policy Paper No. 18, Kohelet. Oct. 2015 [online]. Available at: http://kohelet.org.il/uploads/file/KPF35_challenge%20EU_141015PublicElectronic%20november2015.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, L., MCGARRY, B. What Role Can Constitutional Law Play in Investment Arbitration? Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2014, vol. 15, p. 862.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CANNIZZARO, E. In Defence of Front Polisario: The ECJ as a Global Jus Cogens Maker‘. Common Market Law Review. 2018, vol. 55, pp. 569, 578–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CARDWELL, P. J., WESSEL, R. A. EU External Relations and International Law: Divergence on Questions of „Territory“? In: FAHEY E. (ed.). Framing Convergence with the Global Legal Order: The EU and the World Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020, p. 9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CHENG, B. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. London: Stevens & Sons, 1953, pp. 279–89, 357.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CONTARTESE, C., ANDENAS, M. EU Autonomy and Investor-State Dispute Settlement under inter se Agreements between EU Member States: Achmea‘ CMLRev. 2019, pp. 157, 158.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CONTARTESE, C. The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in the ECJ’s External Relations Case Law: From the ,,Essential“ to the ,,Specific Characteristics“ of the Union and Back‘. CMLRev. 2017, p. 1627.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CRAWFORD, J. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. OUP 2012, pp. 451–5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DASHWOOD, A. Article 26 ECT and intra-EU Disputes – the Case Against an Expansive Reading of Achmea‘. ELR. 2021, pp. 415, 423.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE WITTE, B. A Selfish Court? The Court of Justice and the Design of International Dispute Settlement Beyond the European Union. In: CREMONA, M. and THIES, A. (eds.). The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law: Constitutional Challenges. Hart Publishing, 2014, pp. 33–46, 46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE WITTE, B. European Union Law: How Autonomous is its Legal Order? Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht. 2010, p. 141.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DISTEFANO, G. La notion de titre juridique et les différends territoriaux dans l’ordre international. Revue Générale de Droit International Public. 1995, p. 335.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ECKES, C. International Law as Law of the EU: The Role of the ECJ. In: ENZO CANNIZZARO, E., PALCHETTI, P., WESSEL, R. A. (eds.). International Law as Law of the European Union, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011, pp. 353–377, CLEER Working Paper 2010/6. Available at: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2096203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FRANSEN, R., RYNGAERT, C.EU Extraterritorial Obligations with Respect to Trade with Occupied Territories: Reflections after the Case of Front Polisario before EU Courts‘ Europe and the World: A law review. 2018, vol. 2, pp. 7, 19–21 [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.07.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FRID DE VRIES, R. Judicial Conduct and Investment Treaty Claims: Lessons from the Israeli Gas Cases and the Eli Lilly Award. Transnational Dispute Management-TDM. 2019, vol. 2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FRID DE VRIES, R. EU Judicial Review of Trade Agreements Involving Disputed Territories: Lessons From The Front Polisario Judgments, Colombia Journal of European Law. 2018, vol. 24, pp. 498, 522.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FRID DE VRIES, R. Trade and Investment Dispute Settlement: The Relations between International and National Tribunals. Eliva Press SRL, 2020, p. 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOVAERE, I. Beware of the Trojan Horse: Dispute Settlement in (Mixed) Agreements and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order. In: HILLION, C., KOUTRAKOS, P. (eds.). Mixed agreements revisited, the EU and its member states in the world. Hart Publishing, 2010, pp. 187, 203–204.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOVAERE, I. Interconnecting Legal Systems and the Autonomous EU Legal Order: A Balloon Dynamic. In: GOVAERE, I., GARBEN, S. (eds.). The Interface Between EU and International Law: Contemporary Reflections. Hart Publishing, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARPAZ, G. The Dispute over the Treatment of Products Exported to the European Union from the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip – The Limits of Power and the Limits of the Law. Journal of World Trade 2004, vol. 38, p. 1049.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARPAZ, G. The Front Polisario Verdict and the Gap between the EU’s Trade Treatment of Western Sahara and Its Treatment of the Occupied Palestinian Territories‘. Journal of World Trade. 2018, vol. 52, pp. 619, 639.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAUSWALDT, C. Problems under the EC- Israel Association Agreement: The Export of Goods Produced in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip under the EC-Israel Association Agreement. European Journal of International Law. 2003, vol. 14(3), p. 591.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HELFER, L. R. The Effectiveness of International Adjudicators, Chapter 2. In: ROMANO C., ALTER, K., SHANY, Y. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. OUP, 2014, pp. 464.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HIRSH, M. Rules of Origin as Foreign Policy Instruments? Fordham International Law Journal. 2003, vol. 26, p. 572.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HUMMELBRUNNER, S. What’s in a Name? The Psagot Judgment and Questions of Labelling of Settlement Products Contextualisation of Psagot in Light of Other CJEU Case Law on Occupied Territories, Insights Special Section. 2019, vol. 4, pp. 779, 788–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JACKSON, J. J. The World Trading System, Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. MIT: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JAREMBA, U., PISCITELLI, G., Investment tribunals vis-à-vis national courts: Lessons on judicial dialogue from the EU. In: BIONDI, A., SANGIUOLO, G. (eds.). The EU and the rule of law in international economic relations: an agenda for an enhanced dialogue. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, Chapter 4, pp. 69–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JENNINGS, R. Y. The Judiciary, International and National, and the Development of International Law, ICLQ. 1996, vol. 45, pp. 1, 1–4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KANEVSKAIA, O. EU Labelling Practices for Products Imported from Disputed Territories‘ TILEC Discussion Paper. 2019, pp. 21–23 [online]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2956308
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KANEVSKAIA, O. The Psagot Judgment and Questions of Labelling of Settlement Products Misinterpreting Mislabelling : The Psagot Ruling, Insights Special Section – What’s in a Name? 2019, vol. 4, pp. 763, 775.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KASSOTI, E., ODERMATT, J. The Principle of Autonomy and International Investment Arbitration: Reflections on Opinion 1/17, QuestIntlL. 2020, p. 5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KASSOTI, E. The Council v. Front Polisario Case: The Court of Justice’s Selective Reliance on International Rules on Treaty Interpretation (Second Part), European Papers. 2017, vol. 2, pp. 23–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KECK A., SCHROPP, S. Working Paper No. 2: Indisputably Essential: The Economics of Dispute Settlement Institutions in Trade Agreements, WTO, 2007 [online]. Available at: www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd200702_e.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KONTOROVITCH, E. Some state practice regarding trade with occupied territories: from the GATT to today. In: DUVAL, A., KASSOTI, E. (eds.). The Legality of Economic Activities in Occupied Territories International, EU Law and Business and Human Rights Perspectives. Routledge, 2020, pp. 65, 68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOUTRAKOS, P. Editorial: But Seriously, What is the Principle of Autonomy Really About? ELR. 2018, pp. 293–294.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEVY, I. Intra-EU Game Changer or an Exception that Confirms the Rule? EFILA Blog, 20-7-2022 [online]. Available at: https://efilablog.org/2022/07/20/green-power-v-spain-intra-eu-game-changer-or-an-exception-that-confirms-the-rule/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LIEBKIND, A., HOLST, A. Landmark Judgments Rendered by Swedish Courts in the Achmea Saga, EFILA Blog, 20 December 2022 [online]. Available at: Landmark Judgments Rendered by Swedish Courts in the Achmea Saga – EFILA Blog
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MARESCEAU, M. The Brita ruling of the European Court of Justice: a few comments, In GOVAERE, I., QUICK, R., BRONCKERS, M. Trade and Competition Law in the Eu and Beyond. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, p. 283.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MCLACHLAN, C, SHORE, L., WEINIGER, M. International Investment Arbitration Substantive Principles. OUP 2010, pp. 80–81, 89–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MONT. T State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration – Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation. Hart 2009, p. 293 et seq.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MUNIN, N. Can Customs Rules Solve Difficulties Created by Public International Law?: Thoughts on the ECJ’s Judgment in the Brita Case (C-386/08). Global Trade and Customs Journal. 2011, vol. 6, p. 193.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MUNIN, N. EU Measures Towards Israeli Activities in the Occupied Territories and the BDS: A Diplomatic Achievement or a Pyrrhic Victory? The Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. St. Thomas University, Florida, 2016, vol. 7(3), 19–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MUNIN, N., SITBON, O. Between Normative Power and Soft Power: The Psagot case, Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies. 2021, Vol 13(1) pp. 25–27. MUNIN, N. The Evolution of Dispute Settlement Provisions in Israel’s PTAs: Is There a Global Lesson? Journal of World Trade. 2010, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 385–403, 386, 401.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NOLLKAEMPER, A. Conversations among Courts: Domestic and International Adjudicators, Chapter 24. In: ROMANO C., ALTER, K., SHANY, Y. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. OUP, 2014, pp. 523–49, 525.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NOLLKAEMPER, A. National Courts and the International Rule of Law. OUP, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NOLLKAEMPER, A., REINISCH, JANIK, R., SIMLINGER, F. (eds.). International Law in Domestic Courts – A Casebook. OUP, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ODERMATT, J. The Court of Justice of the European Union: International or Domestic Court? Cambridge J. Int’l & Comp. L. 2014, vol. 3, pp. 696–99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ODERMATT, J. Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la saguia-el-hamra et du rio deoro (Front Polisario) – Case C-104/16 P. American Journal of International Law. 2017, vol. 111(3), p. 738.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ODERMATT, J. Is EU law international? Case C-741/19 Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC And the Autonomy of the EU legal order‘ European Papers. 2021, Vol. 6, No 3, pp. 1255–1268.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PARDO S., ZEMER, L. The Image of European Union Law in Bilateral Relations. Vanderbilt Law Review. 2021, vol. 54, pp. 182–196 [online]. Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol54/iss1/4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PAULSSON, J. Denial of Justice in International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PURNHAGEN P., KAI, P., VAN ZEBEN, J., AHLBORN, C., OOSTERVEER, A. Beyond Food Safety – EU Food Information Standards as a Facilitator of Political Consumerism and International Law Enforcement Mechanism‘. Wageningen Working Papers. In: Law, 2020, p. 1 [online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339167245
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REICH, A. The Juridicization of International Trade Relations. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business. 1997, vol. 17, p. 775.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REUTER, A. Taking Investors‘ Rights Seriously : The Achmea and CETA Rulings of the European Court of Justice Do Not Bar Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, EFILA Blog EU Investment Law and Arbitration. 2020 [online]. Available at: https://efilablog.org/2020/08/12/taking-investors-rights-seriously-the-achmea-and-ceta-rulings-of-the-european-court-of-justice-do-not-bar-intra-eu-investment-a
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROSAS, A. International Responsibility of the EU and the European Court of Justice. In: M. EVANS, M., KOUTRAKOS, P. (eds.). The International Responsibility of the European Union, European and International Perspectives. Hart Publishing, 2013, pp. 139–159 at p. 159.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROSHER, P., FOUCHARD, C., THIEFFRY, V., ROBERT, E., ADANT, M., CALLOWAY, A. ,Moldova v. Komstroy (Case C- 741/19): Key Lessons and Takeaways, Reed Smith In-depth, 16 September 2021 [online]. Available at: reedsmith.com
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RYNGAERT, C. The Concept of Jurisdiction in International Law [online]. Available at: https://unijuris.sites.uu.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2014/12/The-Concept-of-Jurisdiction-in-International-Law.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RYNGAERT, C. The Psagot Judgment and Questions of Labelling of Settlement Products Indications of Settlement Provenance and the Duty of Non-Recognition Under International Law. What’s in a Name? Insights Special Section. 2019, vol. 4, pp. 791, 793.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHILL S. W. (ed.). International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. OUP, 2010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHILL, S. W. Editorial: The Constitutional Frontiers of International Economic Law, (2017) 18 The Journal of World Investment and Trade. 2017, vol. 18, p. 1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHANY, Y. Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Chapter 36. In: ROMANO C., ALTER, K., SHANY, Y. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. OUP, 2014, pp. 798-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHANY, Y. The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals. OUP, 2003, p. 108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VAN ELSUWEGE, P. The principle of self-determination in relations between the EU and its neighbours: Between Realpolitik and respect for international law, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht. 2018, p. 761.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WUSCHKA, S. Investment tribunals adjudicating claims relating to occupied territories – curse or blessing? In: DUVAL, A., KASSOTI, E. (eds.). The Legality of Economic Activities in Occupied Territories International, EU Law and Business and Human Rights Perspectives. Routledge, 2020, p. 251.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
East Timor (Portugal v Australia) [1995] ICJ Rep 90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969 (VCLT).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part [2000] OJ L 147/3 (EU-Israel AA).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C 872/19 P Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v Council of the European Union, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 22 June 2021 (Venezuela).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Opinion of AG Hogan Case C-872/19 P Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v Council of the European Union, 20 January 2021 (AG Venezuela).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vattenfall et al. v. Germany, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/12, Decision on the Achmea issue, 17 August 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case 181/73 Haegeman [1974] ECR 449 (Haegeman).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C 321/97 Ulla-Brith Andersson and Susannne Wåkerås-Andersson v Svenska staten ECLI:EU:C:1999:307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C 300/01 Salzmann ECLI:EU:C:2003:283.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C 284/16 Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV ECLI:EU:C:2018:158 (Achmea).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) (concluded 17 December 1994, entered into force 16 April 1998) 2080 UNTS 95 [online]. Available at: www.energycharter.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-741/19 Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC ECLI:EU:C:2021:655 (Komstroy).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Opinion of AG Szpunar in Case C 741/19 Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC ECLI:E U:C:2021:164 (Komstroy AG).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C 109/20 Republic of Poland v PL Holdings Sàrl ECLI:EU:C:2021:875, 26 October 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joined Cases C-317/04 and C- 318/04, European Parliament v Council, [2006] ECR I-4721
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA [2006] ECR I-403.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agreement establishing an association between the European Economic Community and Turkey of 23 December 1963, [1964] OJ L217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip [1997] OJ L 187/3 (EU-PLO AA).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Notice to importers – Imports from Israel into the Community, 23 Nov. 2001 (OJ 2001 C 328, 6) (Notice to importers 2001).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council of the EU, Council Conclusion on the Middle East Process, 3209 Foreign Affairs Council Meeting, 10 Dec. 2012, para 4 (Council Decision 2012).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
„Interpretative Notice on Indication of Origin of Goods from the Territories Occupied by Israel Since June 1967“, Brussels, 11 Oct. 2015 C(2015) 7834 final (2015 Interpretative Notice).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-386/08 Firma Brita GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen [2010] ECR I-01289 (Brita).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-363/18, Organisation juive européenne and Vignoble Psagot [GC], Court of Justice, judgment of 12 November 2019 (Psagot).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation (EU) 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation (EU) 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-104/16 P, Council of the European Union v. Front Polisario, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), of 21 December 2016, EU:C:2016:973.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
T 512/12, Front Polisario v Council, EU:T:2015:953, 10 December 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GC judgments of 29 September 2021: Case T-279/19, Case T-344/19, Case T-356/19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case C-399/22, Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 15 June 2022 – Confédération paysanne v Ministère de l’agriculture et de la souveraineté alimentaire, Ministère de l’économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle et numérique [online]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=F53DAECAE9E2315BDC1951C8C5B494D0?text=&docid=265811&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=4364
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case 104/81 Kupferberg [1982] ECR 3641.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Opinion of Advocate General Bot of 29 October 2009, Case C-386/08 Brita.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green Power Partners K/S & SCE Solar Don Benito APS v Spain (SCC 2016/135), para 478 (Green Power).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Swedish Supreme Court’s judgment in Poland v. PL Holdings (Case No. T 1569-19).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Svea Court of Appeal’s judgment in Spain v. Novenergia II (Case No. T 4658-18).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2020 International Arbitration Survey: Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2020-isds/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European External Action Service Fact Sheet on indication of origin of goods from the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967, 4 [online]. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/20151111_fact_sheet_indication_of_origin_final_en.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2013/C205/05 Guidelines on the Eligibility of Israeli Entities in the Territories Occupied by Israel since June 1967 for Grants, Prizes and Financial Instruments Funded by the EU from 2014 Onwards, OJ C 205/5 of July 19, 2013 (2013 Guidelines).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Citizens’ initiative to the Commission regarding trade with DTs 8-9-21, Ensuring Common Commercial Policy conformity with EU Treaties and compliance with international law‘
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Restrictions applied by Ukraine on exports of certain wood products to the European Union Final Report of the Arbitration Panel established pursuant to Art 307 of the Association Agreement between Ukraine of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, Lugano, 11 December 2020 https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2020/december/tradoc_159181.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
