Disinformation, Misinformation and the Agri-Food Sector

1 Ali, R. N. – Rubin, H. – Sarkar, S. Countering the potential re-emergence of a deadly infectious disease – Information warfare, identifying strategic threats, launching countermeasures. In PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 8. [online]. [cit. 15. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0256014 Search in Google Scholar

2 Baptista, J. P. – Gradim, A. 2022. A Working Definition of Fake News. In Encyclopedia, vol. 2, 2022, no. 1, pp. 632–645. [online]. [cit. 17. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/2/1/43 Search in Google Scholar

3 Bennett, W. – Livingston, S. 2018. The disinformation order: disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. In European Journal of Communication, vol. 33, 2018, no. 2, pp. 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317 Search in Google Scholar

4 Brown, V. et al. 2020. Risks of introduction and economic consequences associated with african swine fever, classical swine fever and foot-and-mouth disease: a review of the literature. In Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, vol. 68, 2020, no. 4, pp. 1910–1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13919 Search in Google Scholar

5 Cook, N. A. 2017. Posttruth, Truthiness, and Alternative Facts: Information Behavior and Critical Information Consumption for a New Age. In The Library Quarterly, vol. 87, 2017, no. 3, pp. 211–221. Search in Google Scholar

6 Čechmánek, K. 2023. Dezinformácie asvet korporácií. In Mura, L. (ed.) Mladí vedci 2023. Bratislava : Paneurópska vysoká škola, Fakulta ekonómie a podnikania, Ekonomická univerzita v Bratislave, Obchodná fakulta v spolupráci s Univerzitou J. Selyeho, Fakultou ekonómie ainformatiky as Odborom ekonomiky amanažmentu Slovenskej akadémie pôdohospodárskych vied v roku 2023, pp. 46–62. Search in Google Scholar

7 Davidson, M. 2017. Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies. In Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 19, 2017, no. 4, pp. 403–407. Search in Google Scholar

8 Delsman, J. et al. 2016. Global sampling to assess the value of diverse observations in conditioning a real-world groundwater flow and transport model. In Water Resources Research, vol. 52, 2016, no. 3, pp. 1652–1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr016476 Search in Google Scholar

9 Dretske, F. I. 1982. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge : The MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-04063-8 Search in Google Scholar

10 Dubóczi, P. – Škríbová, S. 2023. Imported grain from Ukraine dubbed “toxic” by dubious actors spreading anti-Ukrainian sentiment. Friedrich Naumann Foundation. [online]. [cit. 11.04.2024]. Available at: https://www.freiheit.org/central-europe-and-baltic-states/imported-grain-ukraine-dubbed-toxic-dubious-actors-spreading-anti Search in Google Scholar

11 Erlich, A. – Garner, C. 2021. Is pro-kremlin disinformation effective? Evidence from Ukraine. In The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 28, 2021, no. 1, pp. 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211045221 Search in Google Scholar

12 EUROBAROMETER. 2018. [online]. [cit. 24. 2. 2024]. Available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2183 Search in Google Scholar

13 Fallis, D. 2015. A conceptual analysis of disinformation? In Library Trends, vol. 63, 2015, no. 3, pp. 401–426. Search in Google Scholar

14 Gelfert, A. 2018. Fake News: A Definition. In Informal Logic, vol. 38, 2018, no. 1, pp. 84–117. [online]. [cit. 30.10.2023]. Available at: https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/informallogic/2018-v38-n1-informallogic04379/1057034ar.pdf Search in Google Scholar

15 General Assembly of the United Nations. 2022. Resolution 76/227 on Countering disinformation for the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. [online]. [cit. 13. 4. 2024]. Available at: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n21/416/87/pdf/n2141687.pdf?token=MmodZasFNlDDloSqR1&fe=true Search in Google Scholar

16 Getson, J. M. et al. 2022. Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture. In Plos One, vol. 17, 2022, no. 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269927 Search in Google Scholar

17 Ghosh, M. 2019. Climate-smart agriculture, productivity and food security in india. In Journal of Development Policy and Practice, vol. 4, 2019, no. 2, pp. 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133319862404 Search in Google Scholar

18 Hassanian-Moghaddam, H. et al. 2020. Double trouble: methanol outbreak in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran-a cross-sectional assessment. In Critical Care, vol. 24, 2020, no. 402. [online]. [cit. 15.10.2023]. Available at: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-020-03140-w Search in Google Scholar

19 Herring, R. 2023. Genetically modified democracy: transgenic crops in contemporary india by aniketaga. In Journal of Agrarian Change, vol. 23, 2023, no. 4, pp. 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12529 Search in Google Scholar

20 Hiltbrand, K. et al. 2023. 228 food for thought: how influenceable is the next generation consumer. In Journal of Animal Science, vol. 101, 2023, no. 3, pp. 148–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad281.182 Search in Google Scholar

21 Hussain, A. et al. 2018. The Anti-vaccination Movement: A Regression in Modern Medicine. In Cureus, vol. 10, 2018, no. 7. [online]. [cit. 16.10.2023]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122668/ Search in Google Scholar

22 Chowdhury, A. et al. 2023. Systematic Review of Misinformation in Social and Online Media for the Development of an Analytical Framework for Agri-Food Sector. In Sustainability, vol. 15, 2023, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064753 Search in Google Scholar

23 Islam, M, S. et al. 2020. COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis. In The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 103, 2020, no. 4, pp. 1621–1629. ISSN 1476-1645 Search in Google Scholar

24 Kapferer, J. N. 1989. A Mass Poisoning Rumor in Europe. In Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 53, 1989, pp. 467–481. Search in Google Scholar

25 Karinshak, E. 2023. Ai-driven disinformation: a framework for organizational preparation and response. In Journal of Communication Management, vol. 27, 2023, no. 4, pp. 539–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-09-2022-0113 Search in Google Scholar

26 Kolchinsky, E. I. – Kutschera, U. – Hossfeld, U. –Levit, G. S. 2017. Russia’s New Lysenkoism. In Current Biology, vol. 27, 2017, no. 19, pp. R1042–R1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.045 Search in Google Scholar

27 Lotto, M. et al. 2023. Ethical principles for infodemiology and infoveillance studies concerning infodemic management on social media. In Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130079 Search in Google Scholar

28 Loucks, D. 2021. Science informed policies for managing water. In Hydrology, vol. 8, 2021, no. 2, p. 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020066 Search in Google Scholar

29 Lynas, M. – Adams, J. – Conrow, J. 2022. Misinformation in the media: global coverage of GMOs 2019–2021. InGM Crops & Food – Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain, 2022, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2022.2140568 Search in Google Scholar

30 Meel, P. – Vishwakarma, D. K. 2020. Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities. In Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 153. [online]. [cit. 20. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0957417419307043 Search in Google Scholar

31 Merriam-Webster Dicitionary. 2023. [online]. [cit. 18.10.2023]. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misinformation Search in Google Scholar

32 Muhvić, D. – Čulo, I. 2022. “Fake news” in times of crisis in the context of article 10 of the european convention on human rights. In Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveučilišta U Rijeci, vol. 43, 2022, no. 1, pp. 189–207. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.43.1.10 Search in Google Scholar

33 Pathak, A. – Srihari, R. K. – Natu, N. 2021. Disinformation: analysis and identification. In Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, vol. 27, 2021, no. 3, pp. 357–375. Search in Google Scholar

34 Persily, N. 2017. The 2016 U.S. Election: Can democracy survive the internet? In Journal of Democracy, vol. 28, 2017, no. 2, pp. 63–76. Search in Google Scholar

35 Pertwee, E. – Simas, C. – Larson, H. J. 2022. An epidemic of uncertainty: rumors, conspiracy theories and vaccine hesitancy. In Nature Medicine, vol. 28, 2022, pp. 456–459. Search in Google Scholar

36 Rahmanian, E. 2023. Fake news: a classification proposal and a future research agenda. In Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, vol. 27, 2023, no. 1, pp. 60–78. Search in Google Scholar

37 Rippke, U. et al. 2016. Timescales of transformational climate change adaptation in sub-saharan african agriculture. In Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, 2016, no. 6, pp. 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2947 Search in Google Scholar

38 Rust, N. et al. 2021. Have farmers had enough of experts? In Environmental Management, vol. 69, 2021, no. 1, pp. 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01546-y Search in Google Scholar

39 Staender, A. – Humprecht, E. 2022. Content Analysis in the Research Field of Disinformation. In Oehmer-Pedrazzi, F., Kessler, S. H., Humprecht, E. Sommer, K., Castro, L. (Eds.). Standardisierte Inhaltsanalyse in der Kommunikations-wissenschaft – Standardized Content Analysis in Communication Research. Springer VS, 2022, pp. 339–348. Search in Google Scholar

40 UNESCO. 2018. Journalism, ‘Fake News’ & Disinformation: Handbook for Journalism Education and Training. Paris : United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2018. ISBN 978-92-3-100281-6 Search in Google Scholar

41 UNICEF Montenegro. 2021. 43% citizens believe in a conspiracy theory regarding the concealment of information about vaccines. [online]. [cit. 17. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/montenegro/en/stories/43-citizens-believe-conspiracy-theory-regarding-concealment-information-about-vaccines Search in Google Scholar

42 Wang, CH. 2020. Fake News and Related Concepts: Definitions and Recent Research Development. In Contemporary Management Research, vol. 16, 2020, no. 3, pp. 145–174. Search in Google Scholar

43 Wardle, C. 2017. Fake news. It’s complicated. [online]. [cit. 17. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79 Search in Google Scholar

44 World Economic Forum. 2013. Global Risks 2013. [online]. [cit. 18.10.2023]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalRisks_Report_2013.pdf Search in Google Scholar

45 World Economic Forum. 2024. The Global Risks Report 2024. [online]. [cit. 13.04.2024]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf?_gl=1*182sqyd*_up*MQ..&gclid=CjwKCAjw_e2wBhAEEiwAyFFFo9_81poNFVaU-DVG-lkqqJjylB_6qAsKOXOPEnAMYALJudbrod4XnBoCr7sQAvD_BwE Search in Google Scholar

46 Wu, L. et al. 2019. Misinformation in Social Media: Definition, Manipulation, and Detection. In ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 21, 2019, no. 2, pp. 80–90. [online]. [cit. 17.10.2023]. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3373464.3373475 Search in Google Scholar

47 Yang, Z. – Luo, X. – Jia, H. 2021. Is It All a Conspiracy? Conspiracy Theories and People’s Attitude to COVID-19 Vaccination. In Vaccines, vol. 9, 2021, no. 10. [online]. [cit. 15. 10. 2023]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/10/1051 Search in Google Scholar