[
Ambe, I. M. (2019). The role of public procurement to socio-economic development. International Journal of Procurement Management, 12(6), 652-668.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Apostolou, B., & Hassell, J. M. (1993). An empirical examination of the sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to departures from recommended consistency ratios. Mathematical and computer modelling, 17(4-5), 163-170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bergman, M., Lundberg, S., & Giancarlo, S. (2012). Public procurement and noncontractible quality: evidence from elderly care. Umeå University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bratt, C., Hallstedt, S., Robèrt, K. H., Broman, G., & Oldmark, J. (2013). Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 309-316.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corruption Perceptions Index (2024). Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023, Accessed on: May 15, 2025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dobi, K., Gugić, J., & Kancijan, D. (2010, June). AHP as a decision support tool in the multicriteria evaluation of bids in public procurement. In Proceedings of the ITI 2010, 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (pp. 447-452). IEEE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dong, Q., & Cooper, O. (2016). A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2), 521-530.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dotoli, M., Epicoco, N., & Falagario, M. (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision Making techniques for the management of public procurement tenders: A case study. Applied Soft Computing, 88, 106064.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2024). Public procurement. Retrieved from: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/public-procurement_en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feng, Z., Glinskaya, E., Chen, H., Gong, S., Qiu, Y., Xu, J., & Yip, W. (2020). Long-term care system for older adults in China: policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects. The Lancet, 396(10259), 1362-1372.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., González-Cruz, M. C., & González-Gaya, C. (2017). Environmental criteria in the Spanish public works procurement process. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(2), 204.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness. In Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamilton, S. G. (2022). Public procurement–price-taker or market-shaper?. Critical perspectives on international business, 18(4), 574-615.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Selection of new production facilities with the group analytic hierarchy process ordering method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7317-7325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khan, M. R., Alam, M. J., Tabassum, N., & Khan, N. A. (2022). A Systematic review of the Delphi–AHP method in analyzing challenges to public-sector project procurement and the supply chain: A developing country’s perspective. Sustainability, 14(21), 14215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klingler, D. U. (2020). Measuring what matters in public procurement law: Efficiency, quality and more. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 21(3), 73-98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Law on Public Procurement (2019). Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 91/2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcarelli, G., & Nappi, A. (2019). Multicriteria approach to select the most economically advantageous tender. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(3), 201–223. doi:10.1108/jopp-05-2018-0020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mimović, P., & Krstić, A. (2016). Application of multi-criteria analysis in the public procurement process optimization. Economic Themes, 54(1), 103-128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD, & JRC. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD publishing. Retrieved from: https://www.oecdilibrary.org/economics/handbook-on-constructing-composite-indicators-methodology-and-user-guide_9789264043466-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Office for Public Procurement of the Republic of Serbia (2024). Public procurement development program in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2024 – 2028. Retrieved from https://www.ujn.gov.rs/?page_id=1179
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ossadnik, W., Schinke, S., & Kaspar, R. H. (2016). Group aggregation techniques for analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: a comparative analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25, 421-457.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ozyurek, İ., & Erdal, M. (2018). Assessment of qualification criteria described in public procurement law code 4734 in construction works by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Gazi University Journal of Science, 31(2), 437-454.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmujoki, A., Parikka‐Alhola, K., & Ekroos, A. (2010). Green public procurement: analysis on the use of environmental criteria in contracts. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 19(2), 250-262.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pejin Stokić, Lj., & Bajec, J. (2018). ESPN Thematic Report on Challenges in long-term care Serbia 2018, European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrović, G., Mihajlović, J., Ćojbašić, Ž., Madić, M., & Marinković, D. (2019). Comparison of three fuzzy MCDM methods for solving the supplier selection problem. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 17(3), 455-469.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pircher, B. (2020). EU public procurement policy: the economic crisis as trigger for enhanced harmonisation. Journal of European Integration, 42(4), 509-525.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popović, Ž., Stanković, J., & Veselinović, I. (2015). Influence of subjective preferences on the decision-making process in a multi-criteria model of public procurement. TEME, 39(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6281-2_31
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, Thomas L, & Vargas, L. G. (2013). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process 2nd Edition. Berlin, Germany: Springer
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sönnichsen, S. D., & Clement, J. (2020). Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118901.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Public Procurement Law (2015). Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia. https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/sites/ppp.worldbank.org/files/documents/Law%20No.%20124-2012%2C%2014-2015%20and%2068-2015%20on%20Public%20Procurement.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tahriri, F., Osman, M. R., Ali, A., Yusuff, R., & Esfandiary, A. (2008). AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 1(2), 54-76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795-825.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, Q., Zhang, R., & Liu, J. (2020). Price/time/intellectual efficiency of procurement: Uncovering the related factors in Chinese public authorities. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(3), 100622.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). A quality function deployment–based resource allocation approach for elderly care service: perspective of government procurement of public service. International social work, 64(6), 992-1008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zadnik-Stirn, L., & Grošelj, P. (2010). Multiple critera methods with focus on analytic hierarchy process and group decision making. Croatian Operational Research Review, 1(1), 2-11.
]Search in Google Scholar
