[Androshchuk A. 2006. Transition Economies: A Look at Russia, Ukraine and Poland. Honors College Theses, 32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barrett J., Peters G., Wiedmann T., Scott K., Lenzen M., Roelich K., Le Quéré C. 2013. Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study. Climate Policy, 13, 4: 451–470.10.1080/14693062.2013.788858]Search in Google Scholar
[Buras P. 2017. Europe and its Discontents: Poland’s collision course with the European Union. European Council of Foreign Relations, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conti J., Holtberg P., Diefenderfer J., LaRose A., Turnure J. T., Westfall L. 2016. International Energy Outlook 2016 with Projections to 2040. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC.10.2172/1296780]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobroczyński M. 2003. The Essence of Economic Relations between Poland and Russia. Ekonomia, 10: 3–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edens B., Delahaye R., van Rossum M., Schenau S. 2011. Analysis of changes in Dutch emission trade balance(s) between 1996 and 2007. Ecological Economics, 70, 12: 2334–2340.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.006]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. 2014. Taking stock of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hennig B. 2017. Environmental challenges in Central and Eastern Europe. Reviews on Environmental Health, 32, 1–2: 1.10.1515/reveh-2017-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Kratena K., Meyer I. 2010. CO2 emissions embodied in Austrian international trade. FIW Research Reports 2009/10 N° 02. Available at: https://www.fiw.ac.at/fileadmin/Documents/Publikationen/Studien_II/SI02.Studie.CO2_Emissions_Embodied_in_Austrian_International_Trade.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lenzen M. 1998. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input–output analysis. Energy Policy, 26, 6: 495–506.10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00012-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Leontief W. 1941. The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leontief W. 1953. Interregional theory. [in:] W. Leontief (ed.) Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. Oxford University Press, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leontief W. 1970. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 3: 262–271.10.2307/1926294]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipton D., Sachs J. 1990. Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1990, 1: 75–147.10.2307/2534526]Search in Google Scholar
[Marcu A., Chruszczow T., Beli D., Tuokko K., Stoefs W. 2015. Country case-Poland. Climate change for sustainability Growth. CEPS project working paper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mizgajski J.T. 2013. CO2 embodied in trade between Poland and Selected Countries. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 2, 4: 48–60.10.26458/jedep.v2i4.49]Search in Google Scholar
[Olczyk M. 2011. Structural changes in the Polish economy-the analysis of input-output. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, No. 33659.]Search in Google Scholar
[Remuzgo L., Sarabia J.M. 2013. Desigualdad en la distribución mundial de emisiones de CO2 por sectores: Descomposición y estudio de sensibilidad. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 31, 1: 65–92.10.25115/eea.v31i1.3261]Search in Google Scholar
[Rueda-Cantuche J., Amores A. 2010. Consistent and unbiased carbon dioxide emission multipliers: Performance of Danish emission reductions via external trade. Ecological Economics, 69, 5: 988–998.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanz Díaz M.T, Yñiguez Ovando R., Rueda Cantuche J.M. 2016. The relevance of multi-country input-output tables in measuring emissions trade balance of countries: the case of Spain. SORT-Statistics and Operations Research Transactions, 1, 1: 3–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Serrano M, Dietzenbacher E. 2010. Responsibility and trade emission balances: An evaluation of approaches. Ecological Economics, 69, 11: 2224–2232.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Skoczkowski T., Wronka A. 2017. Analysis of EU ETS reforms from Poland’s power sector perspective. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 3: 212–222.10.15199/48.2017.03.49]Search in Google Scholar
[Subak S. 1995. Methane embodied in the international trade of commodities. Global Environmental Change, 5, 5: 433–446.10.1016/0959-3780(95)00056-T]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber S., Matthews H. 2007. Embodied Environmental Emissions in U.S. International Trade, 1997−2004. Environmental Science & Technology, 41, 14: 4875–4881.10.1021/es0629110]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiedmann T. 2009. A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, 69, 2: 211–222.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.026]Search in Google Scholar
[WITS-World Integrated Trade Solution (2018). Poland Trade Summary 2014. Available at: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/POL/Year/2014/Summary text Accessed 30 April 2018]Search in Google Scholar
[Worldbank. 2018b. GDP growth (annual %). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG. Accessed 30 April 2018]Search in Google Scholar
[Worldbank. 2018c. Exports of goods and services (% of GDP). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP. GNFS.ZS. Accessed 30 April 2018]Search in Google Scholar
[Worldbank. 2018d. Imports of goods and services (% of GDP). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP. GNFS.ZS. Accessed 30 April 2018]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang H. 2015. CO2 Emission Embodied in International Trade: Evidence for China. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7, 2: 138–143.10.5539/ijef.v7n2p138]Search in Google Scholar