1. bookVolume 41 (2022): Edizione 2 (June 2022)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1337-947X
Prima pubblicazione
24 Aug 2013
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
access type Accesso libero

The Value of Protected Areas Ranger Service Personnel for Biodiversity Monitoring: Case Study in Paklenica National Park (Croatia)

Pubblicato online: 04 Jul 2022
Volume & Edizione: Volume 41 (2022) - Edizione 2 (June 2022)
Pagine: 183 - 200
Ricevuto: 26 Apr 2022
Accettato: 10 May 2022
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1337-947X
Prima pubblicazione
24 Aug 2013
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Abstract

To preserve the long-term survival of habitats and wildlife, it is necessary to monitor their status. In protected areas, that is, biodiversity centres, rangers have excellent knowledge of specific locations and they spend a large amount of time in the field. But since rangers are not required to have a university degree, the question is whether they can be an added value in baseline survey monitoring. To investigate this issue, a case study was conducted in the Paklenica National Park (Paklenica NP), Croatia, using camera trapping survey between 2011 and 2016 at 22 camera sites. The aims of this survey were (1) to collect baseline data of mammalian diversity, (2) to analyse the regulatory effect of top predators on the trophic pyramid through top–down effects and (3) to estimate the data gathered by ranger service from the Paklenica NP. Data gathered through this study represents the first peer-reviewed list of medium- to large-sized mammals for Paklenica NP, as up till now, there is no peer-reviewed published paper of Paklenica NP mammalian diversity. Results showed that the recorded top predator–mesopredator–prey ratios were concordant with the trophic pyramid hypothesis. Also, as it was expected according to the literature, species richness indices were higher when top predators were present. On analysing the costs for conducting camera trapping survey by external and internal services, a significant difference was observed. Internal rangers’ cost was nine times lower than the external service cost. Future research run by rangers needs to be conducted in way to capture all mammalian biodiversity. Therefore, we propose camera trapping methodology for rangers in the protected areas since this may be an invaluable tool for biodiversity monitoring.

Keywords

Arnoni, H. (2018). Como se tornar um guarda-florestal?. https://super.abril.com.br/mundo-estranho/como-se-tornar-um-guarda-florestal/ Search in Google Scholar

Bider, J. (1968). Animal activity in uncontrolled terrestrial communities as determined by a sand transect technique. Ecol. Monogr., 38(4), 269–308. DOI: 10.2307/1948530. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bundesverband Naturwacht (2022). Germany’s rangers. https://www.bundesverband-naturwacht.de/?lang=en Search in Google Scholar

Burton, A.C., Neilson, E., Moreira, D., Ladle, A., Steenweg, R., Fisher, J.T., Bayne, E. & Boutin S. (2015). Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. J. Appl. Ecol., 52(3), 675–685. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12432. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chen, C., Brodie, J.F., Kays, R., Davies, T.J., Liu, R., Fisher, J.T., Ahumada, J., McShea, W., Sheil, D., Agwanda, B., Andrianarisoa, M.H., Appleton, R.D., Bitariho, R., Espinosa, S., Grigione, M.M., Helgen, K.M., Hubbard, A., Hurtado, C.M., Jansen, P.A., Jiang, X., Jones, A., Kalies, E.L., Kiebou-Opepa, C., Li, X., Lima, M., Meyer, E., Miller, A.B., Murphy, T., Piana, R., Quan, R.C., Rota, C.T., Rovero, F., Santos, F., Schuttler, S., Uduman, A., van Bommel,J.K., Young, H. & Burton A.C. (2022). Global camera trap synthesis highlights the importance of protected areas in maintaining mammal diversity. Conservation Letters, e12865. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12865. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

De Bondi, N., White, J.G., Stevens, M. & Cooke R. (2010). A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities. Wildl. Res., 37(6), 456–465. DOI: 10.1071/WR10046. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E.S., Ngo, H.T., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K.A., Butchart, S.H.M., Chan, K.M.A., Garibaldi, L.A., Ichii, K., Liu, J., Subramanian, S.M., Midgley, G.F., Miloslavich, P., Molnár, Z., Obura, D., Pfaff, A., Polasky, S., Purvis, A., Razzaque, J., Reyers, B., Chowdhury, R.R., Shin, Y.J., Visseren-Hamakers, I., Willis, K.J. & Zayas C.N. (2019). Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science, 366, 6471. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax3100.31831642 Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Du Preez, B., Loveridge, A. & Macdonald D. (2014). To bait or not to bait: A comparison of camera-trapping methods for estimating leopard Panthera pardus density. Biol. Conserv., 176, 153–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.021. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dussault, A.C. (2020). Functionalism without Selectionism: Charles Elton’s “Functional” Niche and the Concept of Ecological Function. Biological Theory, 17(1), 52–67. DOI: 10.1007/s13752-020-00360-9. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Environmental Science (2022). What is a Park Ranger?. https://www.environmentalscience.org/career/park-ranger#:~:text=Most%20park%20ranger%20positions%20require,for%20work%20at%20many%20locations. Search in Google Scholar

Eymann, J., Degreef, J., Häuser, C, Monje, J.C., Samyn, Y. & Vandenspiegel D. (2010). Manual on field recording techniques and protocols for all Taxa Biodiversity Inventories and Monitoring. Brussels: Abc Taxa. Search in Google Scholar

Fankhauser, R. & Enggist P. (2004). Simulation of alpine chamois Rupicapra r. rupicapra habitat use. Ecol. Model., 175(3), 291–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.020. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Glen, A.S., Cockburn, S., Nichols, M., Ekanayake, J. & Warburton B. (2013). Optimising Camera Traps for Monitoring Small Mammals. PLoS ONE, 8(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067940.369591423840790 Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gužvica, G., Gomerčić, T., Šver, L. & Huber Đ. (2006). Photo traps as a method of wild animal movements monitoring in Gorski Kotar Region. In Prirodoslovna istraživanja riječkog područja (pp. 79–80). 14-17 June 2006. Rijeka: Prirodoslovni Muzej Rijeka. Search in Google Scholar

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. & Paul D.R. (2001) Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm Search in Google Scholar

Hewison, A.J.M., Vincent J.P. & Reby D. (1988). Social organisation of European roe deer. In R. Andersen, P. Duncan, & J.D.C. Linnell (Eds.), The European roe deer: the biology of success (pp.189–221). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Howard, J.L. (2014) Managing the natural environment: The role of park rangers and the skills they need. Rural Society, 22(3), 242–250. DOI: 10.5172/rsj.2013.22.3.242. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kross, S.M. & Nelson X.J. (2011). A portable low-cost remote videography system for monitoring wildlife. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2(2), 191–196. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00064.x. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Maffei, L. & Noss A. (2008). How small is too small? Camera trap survey areas and density estimates for ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco. Biotropica, 40(1), 71–75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00341.x. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Malnar, J., Grubešić, M. & Ugarković D. (2015). The influence of snow cover changes on red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) migrations in the Western Part of Gorski Kotar Region in Croatia. South-East European Forestry, 6(1), 65–75. DOI: 10.15177/seefor.15-07 Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Meek, P., Ballard, G., Claridge, A., Kays, R., Moseby, K., O’Brien, T., O’Connell, A., Sanderson, J., Swann, D.E., Tobler, M. & Townsend S. (2014). Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research. Biodivers. Conserv., 23(9), 2321–2343. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0712-8. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Morellet, N., Van Moorter, B., Cargnelutti, B., Angibault, J.-M., Lourtet, B., Merlet, J., Ladet, S. & Hewison A.J.M. (2011). Landscape composition influences roe deer habitat selection at both home range and landscape scales. Landsc. Ecol., 26(7), 999–1010. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-011-9624-0. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mos, J. & Hofmeester T.R. (2020). The Mostela: an adjusted camera trapping device as a promising non-invasive tool to study and monitor small mustelids. Mammal Research, 65(4), 843–853. DOI: 10.1007/s13364-020-00513-y. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

National Parks Austria (2022). Become a Ranger How it works. https://www.nationalparksaustria.at/en/2758.html Search in Google Scholar

Norouzzadeh, M.S., Nguyen, A., Kosmala, M., Swanson, A., Palmer, M. S., Packer, C. & Clune J. (2018). Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 115(25), E5716-E5725. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719367115.601678029871948 Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Official Gazette (2018). No. 76/00., 70/05., 80/13., 15/18. Pravilnik o unutarnjem redu u Nacionalnom parku «Paklenica» Search in Google Scholar

Parks Victoria (2022). Becoming a park ranger. https://www.parks.vic.gov.au/get-into-nature/careers/becoming-a-park-ranger Search in Google Scholar

Reif, V. & Tornberg R. (2006). Using time-lapse digital video recording for a nesting study of birds of prey. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 52(4), 251–258. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-006-0039-1. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ripple, W.J., Estes, J.A., Beschta, R.L., Wilmers, C.C., Ritchie, E.G., Hebble-white, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., Nelson, M.P., Schmitz, O.J., Smith, D.W., Wallach, A.D. & Wirsing A.J. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores. Science, 343(6167). DOI: 10.1126/science.1241484.24408439 Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ritchie, E.G. & Johnson C.N. (2009). Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett., 12(9), 982–998. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01347.x.19614756 Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Roveroa, F., Zimmermann, F., Berzi, D. & Meek P. (2013). Which camera trap type and how many do I need? A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications. Hystrix, 24(2), 148–156. DOI: 10.4404/hystrix-24.2-8789. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Salazar, A. (2021). How do you become a park ranger in Canada?. https://cubetoronto.com/canada/how-do-you-become-a-park-ranger-in-canada/ Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, S., Taylor, G.W., Linquist, S.S. & Kremer S.C. (2018). Past, present, and future approaches using computer vision for animal re-identification from camera trap data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(4), 461–470. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13133. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schuldt, A., Assmann, T., Brezzi, M., Buscot, F., Eichenberg, D., Gutknecht, J.L.M., Härdtle, W., He, J.-S., Klein, A.-M., Kühn, P., Liu, X., Ma, K., Niklaus, P.A., Pietsch, K.A., PurahongW., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmid, B., Scholten, T., Staab, M., Tang, Z., Trogisch, S., von Oheimb, G., Wirth, C., Wubet, T., Zhu, C.-D. & Bruelheide H. (2018). Biodiversity across trophic levels drives multifunctionality in highly diverse forests. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2989. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05421-z. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Shamwari (2022). How to Become a Game Ranger or Field Guide. https://www.shamwari.com/how-to-become-a-game-ranger-or-field-guide/#:~:text=To%20become%20a%20game%20ranger%2C%20you%20need%20to%20attain%20qualification,diploma%20in%20-game%20ranch%20management Search in Google Scholar

Si, X., Kays, R. & Ding P. (2014). How long is enough to detect terrestrial animals? Estimating the minimum trapping effort on camera traps. PeerJ, 2(1), e374. https://peerj.com/articles/374/10.7717/peerj.374 Search in Google Scholar

Silveira, L., Jacomo, A.T.A. & Diniz-Filhoa J.A.F. (2003). Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biol. Conserv., 114, 351–355. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00063-6. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Skorup, V. (2005). Big game and hunting. In J. Vukelić (Ed.), Forests and forestry of Northern Velebit. Zagreb: Hrvatske Šume d.o.o. Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J.K. & Coulson G. (2012). A comparison of vertical and horizontal camera trap orientations for detection of potoroos and bandicoots. Austr. Mammal., 34(2), 196–201. DOI: 10.1071/AM11034. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Swann, D., Hass, C., Dalton, D.C. & Wolf S.A. (2004). Infrared-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: an evaluation and review. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 32(2), 357–365. DOI: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[357:ICFDWA]2.0.CO;2. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Šprem, N., Zanella, D., Ugarković, D., Prebanić, I., Gančević, P. & Corlatti L. (2015). Unimodal activity pattern in forest-dwelling chamois: typical behaviour or interspecific avoidance? European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61(5), 789–794. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-015-0939-z. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Thurfjell, H., Ball, J.P., Åhlén, P.-A., Kornacher, P., Dettki, H. & Sjöberg K. (2009). Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa (L.): agricultural fields and edges. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 55(5), 517–523. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-009-0268-1. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Trebilco, R., Baum, J.K., Salomon, A.K. & Dulvy N.K. (2013). Ecosystem ecology: size-based constraints on the pyramids of life. Trends Ecol. Evol., 28(7), 423–431. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2013.03.008. Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo