[Bösch, M., Elsasser, P., Franz, K., Schneider, H., Lorenz, M., Moning, C., Olschewski, R., Roedl, A., Schröppel, B. & Weller P. (2018). Forest Ecosystem Services in rural areas of Germany - insights from the national TEEB study. Ecosystem Services, 31(Part A), 77−83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.014.10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bujnovský, R. (2015). Evaluation of the ecosystem services of inland waters in the Slovak Republic - to date findings. Ekológia (Bratislava), 34(1), 19−25. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2015-0003.10.1515/eko-2015-0003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Collins, S. & Larry B. (2008). Caring for our natural assets: an ecosystems services perspective. In R.L. Deal (Ed.), Integrated restoration of forested ecosystems to achieve multi-resource benefits (pp. 1−11). Proceedings of the 2007 National Silviculture Workshop. Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cubbage, F., Harou, P. & Sills E. (2007). Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(7), 833−851. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010.10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Daily, G.C., Söderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P.R., Folke, C., Jansson, A.-M., Jansson, B.-O., Kautsky, N., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Mäler, K.-G., Simpson, D., Starrett, D., Tilman, D. & Walker B. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289(5478), 395−396. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5478.395.10.1126/.289.5478.395]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Daily, G.C. (1997). Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington: Island Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deal, R.L., Cochran, B. & LaRocco G. (2012). Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 17, 69−76. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.007.10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ecosystem Marketplace Database. https://www.forest-trends.org/project-list/#s]Search in Google Scholar
[Engel, S., Pagiola, S. & Wunder S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice – An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663−674. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Farley, J. & Costanza R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics, 69, 2060–2068. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.01010.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Forest Europe Expert Group and Workshop on a pan-European approach to valuation of forest ecosystem services. Belegrade Workshop, 24-25 September 2014, Final Report, https://www.foresteurope.org/documentos/Report_Valuation_FES_ForestEurope.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia, S., Abildtrup, J. & Stenger A. (2018). How does economic research contribute to the management of forest ecosystem services?. Ann. For. Sci., 75(2), 53. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-018-0733-7.10.1007/s13595-018-0733-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gómez-Baggethun, E. & Muradian R. (2015). In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of market-based instruments in ecosystem services governance. Ecological Economics, 117, 217−224. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.016.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Huber-Stearns, H.R., Goldstein, J.H. & Duke E.A. (2013). Intermediary roles and payments for ecosystem services: a typology and program feasibility application in Panama. Ecosystem Services, 6, 104–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.006.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[IUCN Regional Office for Europe & IUCN Environmental Law Centre (2009). Final report study on the economic value of groundwater and biodiversity in European forests. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/pdf/grounwater_report.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kati, V., Hovardas, T., Dieterich, M., Ibisch, P.L., Mihok, B. & Selva N. (2015). The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conserv. Biol., 29(1), 260−270. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12366.10.1111/cobi.1236625103194]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kicko, P. (2017). Systém podpory v lesnom hospodárstve na plnenie mimoprodukčných funkcií lesov. In Financovanie podnikov v lesnom hospodárstve (pp. 109−116). Zborník vedeckých prác. Zvolen: Technická univerzita vo Zvolene.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kilgore, M.A, Ellefson, P.B, Funk, T.J. & Frey G.E. (2017). State property tax incentives for promoting ecosystem goods and services from private forest land in the United States: a review and analysis. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–228. Asheville: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station.10.2737/SRS-GTR-228]Search in Google Scholar
[LaRocco, G. & Deal R.L. (2011). Giving credit where credit is due: Increasing landowner compensation for ecosystem services. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-842. Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.10.2737/PNW-GTR-842]Search in Google Scholar
[Ma, Z., Butler, B.J., Catanzaro, P.F., Greene, J.L., Hewes, J.H., Kilgore, M.A., Kittredge, D.B. & Tyrrell M. (2014). The effectiveness of state preferential property tax programs in conserving forests: Comparisons, measurements, and challenges. Land Use Policy, 36, 492–499. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.016.10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Liquete, C., Braat, L., Berry, P., Egoh, B., Puydarrieux, P., Fiorina, Ch., Santos-Martín, F., Paracchini, M.L., Keune, H., Wittmer, H., Hauck, J., Fiala, I., Verburg, P.H., Condé, S., Schägner, J.P., San Miguel, J., Estreguil, Ch., Ostermann, O., Barredo, J.I., Pereira, H.M., Stott, A., Laporte, V., Mainer, A., Olah, B., Royo Gelabert, E., Spyropoulou, R., Petersen, J.E., Maguire, C., Zal, N., Achilleos, E., Rubin, A., Ledoux, L., Brown, C., Raes, C., Jacobs, S., Vandewalle, M., Connor, D. & Bidoglio G. (2013). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Luxemburg: Publication office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2779/12398.10.2779/12398]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Murphy, P., Paracchini, M.L., Barredo, J.I., Grizzetti, B., Cardoso, A., Somma, F., Petersen, J.E., Meiner, A., Gelabert, E.R., Zal, N., Kristensen, P., Bastrup-Birk, A., Biala, K., Romao, C., Piroddi, Ch., Egoh, B., Florina, Ch., Santos, F., Naruševičius, V., Verboven, J., Pereira, H., Bengtsson, J., Kremena, G., Pedroso-Marta, C., Snäll, T., Esterguil, Ch., San Miguel, J., Braat, L., Gret-Regamey, A., Perez-Soba, M., Degeorges, P., Beaufaron, G., Lillebø, A., Marak, A.D., Liquette, C., Condé, S., Moen, J., Östergard, H., Czúcz, B., Drakou, E.G., Zulian, G. & Lavalle C. (2014). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem and their Services. Indicators for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Luxemburg: Publication office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2779/75203.10.2779/75203]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Machar, I. (2013). Applying landscape ecological principles in sustainable forest management of the floodplain forest in the temperate zone of Europe. Ekológia (Bratislava), 32(4), 369−375. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2013-0034.10.2478/eko-2013-0034]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Matzdorf, B., Sattler, C. & Engel S. (2013). Institutional frameworks and governance structures of PES schemes. Forest Policy and Economics, 37, 57−64. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.10.002.10.1016/j.forpol.2013.10.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mavsar, R., Weiss, G., Ramčilović, S., Palahí, M., Rametsteiner, E., Tykkä, S., van Apeldoorn, R., Vreke, J., van Wijk, M., Prokofieva, I., Rekola, M. & Kuuluvainen J. (2008). Study on the development and marketing of non-market products and services. Study report.]Search in Google Scholar
[MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Mercer, D.E. (2004). Policies for encouraging forest restoration. In J.A. Stanturf & P. Madsen (Eds.). Restoration of boreal and temperate forests (pp. 97−109). Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/9780203497784.pt3]Search in Google Scholar
[Miceikiene, A. & Butvilaite A. (2015). Evaluation of the experience in environmental tax reforms in the EU countries. European Scientific Journal, 11(19), 280−299.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nasi, R., Wunder, S. & Campos J. (2002). Forest ecosystem services: Can they pay our way out of deforestation? Paper presented at the roundtable on forests sponsored by the Global Environment Facility; 11 March, New York. Bogor (Indonesia): CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research), for Global Environment Facility.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD (2010). Paying for biodiversity: Enhancing the cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services. OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264090279-en]Search in Google Scholar
[Pagiola, S., Bishop, J. & Landell-Mills N. (Eds.) (2002). Selling forest environmental services. Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development. London: Earthscan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perrot-Maître, D. (2006). The Vittel payments for ecosystem services: a “perfect” PES case. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prokofieva, I. (2016). Payments for Ecosystem Services—the Case of Forests. Current Forestry Reports, 2(2), 130–142. DOI: 10.1007/s40725-016-0037-9.10.1007/s40725-016-0037-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Raitanen, E., Simila, J., Siikavirta, K. & Primmer E. (2013). Economic instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem service conservation & the EU state aid regulation. Journal of European Environmental & Planning Law, 10(1), 6–28. DOI: 10.1163/18760104-01001002.10.1163/18760104-01001002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sarvašová, Z., Šálka, J. & Dobšinská Z. (2013). Mechanism of cross-sectoral coordination between nature protection and forestry in the Natura 2000 formulation process in Slovakia. J. Environ. Manag., 127, S65−S72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.005.10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.00522771263]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schlegelmilch, K. (2002). Overview and recent experiences with ecological tax reforms in Europe. In J. Holst, D. Lee & E. Olson (Eds.), Finance for sustainable development: Testing new policy approaches (pp. 221−245). New York: United Nations.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schomers, S. & Matzdorf B. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services, 6, 16−30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schütz, J.P., Saniga, M., Diaci, J. & Vrška T. (2016). Comparing close-to-nature silviculture with processes in pristine forests: lessons from Central Europe. Ann. For. Sci., 73(4), 911−921. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-016-0579-9.10.1007/s13595-016-0579-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smith, A.C., Harrison, P.A., Pérez Soba, M., Archaux, F., Blicharska, M., Egoh, B.N., Erős, T., Fabrega Domenech, N., György, Á.I., Haines-Young, R., Li, S., Lommelen, E., Meiresonne, L., Miguel Ayala, L., Mononen, L., Simpson, G., Stange, E., Turkelboom, F., Uiterwijk, M., Veerkamp, C.J. & de Echeverria V.W. (2017). How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: a typology derived from a systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 26, 111−126. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006.10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smith, S., Rowcroft, P., Everard, M., Couldrick, L., Reed, M., Rogers, H., Quick, T., Eves, Ch. & White C. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: a best practice guide. London: Defra.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanton, T., Echavarria, M., Hamilton, K. & Ott C. (2010). State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace. State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace. https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/state-of-watershed-payments/]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, E. (1996). Recuperating from market failure: planning for biodiversity and technological competitiveness. Public Administration Review, 56, 21−34.10.2307/3110050]Search in Google Scholar
[Šálka, J. (2006). Analýza verejnej politiky v lesníctve. Zvolen: Technická Univerzita vo Zvolene.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šálka, J. & Dobšinská Z. (2013). Policy Analysis for assuring forest ecosystem externalities. Zvolen: Technická Univerzita vo Zvolene.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNECE (2005). Seminar on environmental services and financing for the protection and sustainable use of ecosystems. Geneva, 10-11 October 2005. National reports. http://www.unece.org/env/water/meetings/payment_ecosystems/seminar.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNECE (2014). The value of forests payments for ecosystem services in green economy. Geneva Forest and Timber Study Paper 34. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/SP-34Xsmall.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1245–1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Venter, O., Laurance, W., Iwamura, T., Wilson, K., Fuller, R. & Possingham H. (2009). Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity. Science, 326(5958), 1368. DOI: 10.1126/science.1180289.10.1126/.1180289]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Viszlai, I., Barredo, J.I. & San-Miguel-Ayanz J. (2016). Payments for forest ecosystem services: SWOT analysis and possibilities for implementation. Joint Research Centre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117, 234–243. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zandersen, M., Grønvik Bråten, K. & Lindhjem H. (2009). Payment for and management of ecosystem services - Issues and options in the Nordic context payment for and management of ecosystem services. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.]Search in Google Scholar