Application of Benford’s law to detect signs of under-invoicing in companies in the restaurant sector during the COVID-19 pandemic
31 dic 2024
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 31 dic 2024
Pagine: 273 - 284
Ricevuto: 29 gen 2024
Accettato: 14 ott 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2024-0020
Parole chiave
© 2024 Ana Martins et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
First digit test_
First digit | All | Variation 25% to 35% | Variation 35% to 75% | Micro-enterprises | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6079 | 5851 | 1097 | 1064 | 1.2 | 2400 | 2331 | 1.7 | 6003 | 5747 | ||
2 | 3313 | 3423 | 615 | 623 | 0.3 | 1288 | 1364 | 3179 | 3362 | |||
3 | 2311 | 2428 | 424 | 442 | 0.9 | 958 | 968 | 0.3 | 2256 | 2385 | ||
4 | 1749 | 1884 | 322 | 343 | 1.2 | 691 | 750 | 1718 | 1850 | |||
5 | 1525 | 1539 | 0.4 | 299 | 280 | 1.2 | 616 | 613 | 0.1 | 1511 | 1512 | 0.0 |
6 | 1285 | 1301 | 0.5 | 221 | 237 | 1.1 | 512 | 518 | 0.3 | 1274 | 1278 | 0.1 |
7 | 1160 | 1127 | 1.0 | 222 | 205 | 1.2 | 468 | 449 | 0.9 | 1152 | 1107 | 1.4 |
8 | 1028 | 994 | 1.1 | 168 | 181 | 1.0 | 430 | 396 | 1.7 | 1019 | 977 | 1.4 |
9 | 987 | 889 | 168 | 162 | 0.5 | 381 | 354 | 1.4 | 978 | 874 | ||
5.13 | 7.9 |
Descriptive statistics_
Group | Statistics | VN | TA | SE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 19,437 | Min | €42 | €79 | €2 |
Max | €102,839,963 | €190,580,920 | €6,148,155 | ||
€259,074 | €269,928 | €26,997 | |||
€1,723,541 | €84 | €70,473 | |||
Min | €900 | €320 | €44 | ||
Variation 25% to 35% | 5,356 | Max | €85,942,653 | €146,861,014 | €2,065,550 |
€299,299 | €267,355 | €21,054 | |||
€1,385,987 | €6,220,523 | €80,215 | |||
Min | €128 | €84 | €13 | ||
Variation 35% to 75% | 7,744 | Max | €35,079,616 | €46,613,670 | €2,641,701 |
€213,915 | €283,069 | €30,914 | |||
€738,058 | €4,964,952 | €63,895 | |||
Min | €42 | €79 | €2 | ||
Micro-enterprises | 19,090 | Max | €1,995,478 | €1,999,423 | €352,160 |
€179,797 | €168,190 | €19,950 | |||
€234,318 | €3,038,999 | €37,210 |
Limit for extraordinary support for progressive recovery_
≥25% to 40% | ≥40% to 60% | ≥60% to 75% | ≥75% | |
NWP reduction of up to 33% | NWP reduction of up to 40% | NWP reduction of up to 60% | NWP reduction of up to 100% |
Measures under the APOIAR Programme_
Measures | Recipient | Loss of turnover | Support to be received | Effective date |
---|---|---|---|---|
APOIAR.PT | Belong to the CAE in Annex A to |
25% or more | 20% of the amount of the decrease in the company’s turnover | 25 November |
APOIAR RESTAURAÇÃO | Belong to the CAE in Annex B to |
20% or more (of the two weekends with the most intense restrictions) | 20% of the amount of the decrease in the company’s turnover | 25 November |
APOIAR RENDAS | Belong to the CAE in Annex A to |
25% or more | 16 January |
Funding rate to be allocated—APOIAR RENDAS_
Loss of turnover | Amount receivable |
---|---|
≥25% and ≤40% | 30% of the monthly rent up to a maximum of €1200 per month and per establishment |
>40% | 50% of the monthly rent up to a maximum of €2000 per month and per establishment |
The first two digits test (some results)_
First two digits | All | Variation 25% to 35% | Variation 35% to 75% | Micro-enterprises | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 861 | 805 | 166 | 146 | 1.66 | 354 | 321 | 1.91 | 855 | 790 | ||
11 | 808 | 734 | 142 | 134 | 0.74 | 352 | 293 | 796 | 721 | |||
22 | 343 | 375 | 1.68 | 73 | 68 | 0.58 | 127 | 149 | 1.86 | 335 | 369 | 1.76 |
24 | 316 | 345 | 1.55 | 58 | 63 | 0.60 | 112 | 137 | 299 | 338 | ||
29 | 260 | 286 | 1.56 | 45 | 52 | 0.99 | 101 | 114 | 1.23 | 248 | 281 | |
43 | 168 | 194 | 1.88 | 33 | 35 | 0.39 | 67 | 77 | 1.18 | 164 | 191 | 1.94 |
44 | 157 | 190 | 28 | 35 | 1.11 | 57 | 76 | 154 | 186 | |||
47 | 161 | 178 | 1.26 | 36 | 32 | 0.65 | 52 | 71 | 158 | 175 | 1.26 | |
49 | 142 | 171 | 24 | 31 | 1.27 | 68 | 68 | 0.01 | 142 | 167 | ||
50 | 156 | 167 | 0.87 | 18 | 31 | 70 | 66 | 0.42 | 154 | 164 | 0.80 | |
57 | 157 | 147 | 0.84 | 37 | 27 | 68 | 58 | 1.25 | 157 | 144 | 1.07 | |
76 | 131 | 110 | 32 | 20 | 45 | 44 | 0.16 | 131 | 108 | |||
79 | 106 | 106 | 0.02 | 29 | 19 | 36 | 42 | 0.97 | 106 | 104 | 0.17 | |
80 | 112 | 105 | 0.70 | 15 | 19 | 0.94 | 52 | 42 | 1.59 | 112 | 103 | 0.89 |
88 | 108 | 95 | 1.29 | 11 | 17 | 1.53 | 51 | 38 | 107 | 94 | 1.38 | |
90 | 113 | 93 | 14 | 17 | 0.72 | 47 | 37 | 1.62 | 110 | 92 | 1.93 | |
96 | 104 | 87 | 1.77 | 22 | 16 | 1.53 | 42 | 35 | 1.21 | 104 | 86 | 1.96 |
98 | 122 | 86 | 27 | 16 | 38 | 34 | 0.66 | 119 | 84 | |||
98 | 106 |
Second digit test_
Second digit | All | Variation 25% to 35% | Variation 35% to 75% | Micro-enterprises | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2415 | 2326 | 432 | 423 | 0.5 | 974 | 927 | 1.7 | 2368 | 2285 | 1.9 | |
1 | 2270 | 2214 | 1.3 | 421 | 403 | 1.0 | 926 | 882 | 1.6 | 2222 | 2174 | 1.1 |
2 | 2108 | 2115 | 0.2 | 387 | 385 | 0.1 | 826 | 843 | 0.6 | 2078 | 2077 | 0.0 |
3 | 1972 | 2028 | 1.3 | 343 | 369 | 1.4 | 782 | 808 | 1.0 | 1937 | 1992 | 1.3 |
4 | 1935 | 1950 | 0.4 | 353 | 355 | 0.1 | 746 | 777 | 1.2 | 1895 | 1915 | 0.5 |
5 | 1908 | 1879 | 0.7 | 342 | 342 | 0.0 | 776 | 749 | 1.1 | 1873 | 1846 | 0.7 |
6 | 1779 | 1815 | 0.9 | 359 | 330 | 1.7 | 698 | 723 | 1.0 | 1753 | 1783 | 0.7 |
7 | 1759 | 1756 | 0.1 | 305 | 319 | 0.8 | 705 | 700 | 0.2 | 1726 | 1725 | 0.0 |
8 | 1719 | 1702 | 0.4 | 321 | 310 | 0.7 | 681 | 678 | 0.1 | 1688 | 1672 | 0.4 |
9 | 1572 | 1652 | 273 | 301 | 1.7 | 630 | 658 | 1.1 | 1550 | 1623 | 1.9 | |
11.7 | 8.9 | 10.1 | 10.1 |