INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Marfan-like disorders

(Other synonyms: Loeys-Dietz syndromes, arterial tortuosity syndrome, thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections, thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections associated with bicuspid aortic valve, aortic aneurysms with cutis laxa)

General information about the disease

Marfan-like disorders are inherited conditions with features resembling Marfan syndrome but that do not match all the diagnostic criteria of the Revised Ghent Nosology (2010) and/or that do not share a pathogenic variant in FBN1. Marfan-like disorders group together different systemic connective tissue disorders caused by mutations in various genes and have different clinical manifestations. For example, Loeys-Dietz syndromes appear with aortic aneurysms and dissections, widespread arterial tortuosity/aneurysms, bifid uvula and hypertelorism (wide spaced eyes) (1). Arterial tortuosity syndrome is mainly characterized by tortuosity and elongation of the large- and medium-sized arteries with a predisposition for stenosis and aneurysms (2). In non-syndromic thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections, the most common site of aneurysms is the infrarenal abdominal aorta, followed by the ascending thoracic aorta (3). Cutis laxa (loose skin) may have variable systemic involvement (inguinal hernia, cardiopulmonary disease and emphysema) (4).

The prevalence of Marfan-like disorders is unknown.

To establish a clinical diagnosis or suspicion, the following multiple diagnostic procedures should be used: clinical examination and history, heart ultrasound, eye examination with slit lamp for lens dislocation, advanced imaging studies of the vascular tree.

Differential diagnosis should consider Marfan syndrome, congenital contractural arachnodactyly/Beals syndrome, homocystinuria caused by cystathionine β-synthase deficiency, Stickler syndrome and fragile X syndrome.

Marfan-like disorders have different phenotypes and clinical features. Inheritance is usually autosomal dominant; cutis laxa, Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and moyamoya disease may show autosomal recessive or dominant transmission patterns (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11).

Autosomal dominant Marfan-like syndromes

MASS syndrome (OMIM disease 604308) - FBN1 (OMIM gene 134797);

Shprintzen-Goldberg craniosynostosis syndrome (SGS, OMIM disease 182212) - SKI (OMIM gene 164780);

Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1 (LDS1, OMIM disease 609192) - TGFBR1 (OMIM gene 190181);

Loeys-Dietz syndrome 2 (LDS2, OMIM disease 610168) - TGFBR2 (OMIM gene 190182);

Loeys-Dietz syndrome 3 (LDS3, OMIM disease 613795) - SMAD3 (OMIM gene 603109);

Loeys-Dietz syndrome 4 (LDS4, OMIM disease 614816) - TGFB2 (OMIM gene 190220);

Loeys-Dietz syndrome 5 (LDS5, OMIM disease 615582) - TGFB3 (OMIM gene 190230);

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 4 (AAT4, OMIM disease 132900) - MYH11 (OMIM gene 160745);

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 6 (AAT6, OMIM disease 611788) - ACTA2 (OMIM gene 102620);

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 7 (AAT7, OMIM disease 613780) - MYLK (OMIM gene 600922);

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 8 (AAT8, OMIM disease 615436) - PRKG1 (OMIM gene 176894);

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 9 (AAT9, OMIM disease 616166) - MFAP5 (OMIM gene 601103);

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 10 (AAT10, OMIM disease 617168) - LOX (OMIM gene 153455);

Cutis laxa autosomal dominant 1 (ADCL1, OMIM disease 123700) - ELN (OMIM gene 130160);

Cutis laxa autosomal dominant 2 (ADCL2, OMIM disease 614434) - FBLN5 (OMIM gene 604580);

Cutis laxa autosomal dominant 3 (ADCL3, OMIM disease 616603) - ALDH18A1 (OMIM gene 138250);

Aortic valve disease 1 (AOVD1, OMIM disease 109730) - NOTCH1 (OMIM gene 190198);

Aortic valve disease 2 (AOVD 2, OMIM disease 614823) - SMAD6 (OMIM gene 602931);

Moyamoya disease 5 (MYMY5, OMIM disease 614042) – ACTA2 (OMIM gene 102620);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type 1 (EDSCL1, OMIM disease 130000) – COL5A1 (OMIM gene 120215);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type 2 (EDSCL2, OMIM disease 130010) - COL5A2 (OMIM gene 120190);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, periodontal type 1 (EDSPD1, OMIM disease 130080) - C1R (OMIM gene 613785);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, periodontal type 2 (EDSPD2, OMIM disease 617174) - C1S (OMIM gene 120580);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type (EDSARTH, OMIM disease 130060) - COL1A1 (OMIM gene 120150);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type (EDSVASC, OMIM disease 130050) - COL3A1 (OMIM gene 120180).

Autosomal recessive Marfan-like syndromes

Arterial tortuosity syndrome (ATS, OMIM disease 208050) - SLC2A10 (OMIM gene 606145);

Autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 1A (ARCL1A, OMIM disease 219100) - FBLN5 (OMIM gene 604580);

Autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 1B (ARCL1B, OMIM disease 614437) - EFEMP2 (OMIM gene 604633);

Autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 2A (ARCL2A, OMIM disease 219200) - ATP6V0A2 (OMIM gene 611716);

Autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 3A (ARCL3A, OMIM disease 219150) - ALDH18A1 (OMIM gene 138250);

Moyamoya disease 6 with achalasia (MYMY6, OMIM disease 615750) - GUCY1A3 (OMIM gene 139396);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, dermatosparaxis type (EDSDERMS, OMIM disease 225410) - ADAMTS2 (OMIM gene 604539);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1 (OMIM disease 225400) – PLOD1 (OMIM gene 153454);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 2 (EDSKSCL2, OMIM disease 614557) - FKBP14 (OMIM gene 614505);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, spondylodysplastic type 1 (EDSSPD1, OMIM disease 130070) - B4GALT7 (OMIM gene 604327);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, spondylodysplastic type 2 (EDSSPD2, OMIM disease 615349) - B3GALT6 (OMIM gene 615291);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, spondylodysplastic type 3 (EDSSPD3, OMIM disease 612350) - SLC39A13 (OMIM gene 608735);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cardiac valvular type (EDSCV, OMIM disease 225320) - COL1A2 (OMIM gene 120160);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, musculocontractural type 1 (EDSMC1, OMIM disease 601776) – (CHST14 OMIM gene 608429);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, musculocontractural type 2 (EDSMC2, OMIM disease 615539) - DSE (OMIM gene 605942);

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic-like (EDSCLL, OMIM disease 606408) - TNXB (OMIM gene 600985).

Pathogenic variants may include missense, nonsense, splicing, small insertions and deletions, small indels, gross insertions, duplications.

Aims of the test

To determine the gene defect responsible for the disease;

To confirm clinical diagnosis;

To assess the recurrence risk and perform genetic counselling for at-risk/affected individuals.

Test characteristics
Specialist centers/ Published Guidelines

The test is listed in the Orphanet database and is offered by 47 accredited medical genetic laboratories in the EU, and in the GTR database, offered by 14 accredited medical genetic laboratories in the US.

Guidelines for clinical use of the test are described in Genetics Home Reference (ghr.nlm.nih.gov) and Gene Reviews (5).

Test strategy

A multi-gene next generation sequencing panel is used for the detection of nucleotide variations in coding exons and flanking introns of the above genes. Potentially causative variants and regions with low coverage are Sanger-sequenced. Sanger sequencing is also used for family segregation studies.

Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification (MLPA) is used to detect duplications and deletions in TGFBR1 and TGFBR2.

To perform molecular diagnosis, a single sample of biological material is normally sufficient. This may be 1 ml peripheral blood in a sterile tube with 0.5 ml K3EDTA or 1 ml saliva in a sterile tube with 0.5 ml ethanol 95%. Sampling rarely has to be repeated. Gene-disease associations and the interpretation of genetic variants are rapidly developing fields. It is therefore possible that the genes mentioned in this note may change as new scientific data is acquired. It is also possible that genetic variants today defined as of “unknown or uncertain significance” may acquire clinical importance.

Genetic test results
Positive

Identification of pathogenic variants in the above genes confirms the clinical diagnosis and is an indication for family studies.

A pathogenic variant is known to be causative for a given genetic disorder based on previous reports, or predicted to be causative based on loss of protein function or expected significant damage to proteins or protein/protein interactions. In this way it is possible to obtain a molecular diagnosis in new/other subjects, establish the risk of recurrence in family members and plan preventive and/or therapeutic measures.

Inconclusive

Detection of a variant of unknown or uncertain significance (VUS): a new variation without any evident pathogenic significance or a known variation with insufficient evidence (or with conflicting evidence) to indicate it is likely benign or likely pathogenic for a given genetic disorder. In these cases, it is advisable to extend testing to the patient’s relatives to assess variant segregation and clarify its contribution. In some cases, it could be necessary to perform further examinations/tests or to do a clinical reassessment of pathological signs.

Negative

The absence of variations in the genomic regions investigated does not exclude a clinical diagnosis but suggests the possibility of:

alterations that cannot be identified by sequencing, such as large rearrangements that cause loss (deletion) or gain (duplication) of extended gene fragments;

sequence variations in gene regions not investigated by this test, such as regulatory regions (5’ and 3’ UTR) and deep intronic regions;

variations in other genes not investigated by the present test.

Unexpected

Unexpected results may emerge from the test, for example information regarding consanguinity, absence of family correlation or other genetically based diseases.

Risk for progeny

If the identified pathogenic variant has autosomal dominant transmission, the probability that an affected carrier transmit the disease variant to his/her children is 50% in any pregnancy, irrespective of the sex of the child conceived.

In autosomal recessive mutations, both parents are usually healthy carriers. In this case, the probability of transmitting the disorder to the offspring is 25% in any pregnancy of the couple, irrespective of the sex of the child. An affected individual generates healthy carrier sons and daughters in all cases, except in pregnancies with a healthy carrier partner. In these cases, the risk of an affected son or daughter is 50%.

Limits of the test

The test is limited by current scientific knowledge regarding the gene and disease.

Analytical sensitivity (proportion of positive tests when the genotype is truly present) specificity (proportion of negative tests when the genotype is not present)

NGS Analytical sensitivity >99.99%, with a minimum coverage of 10X; Analytical specificity 99.99%.

SANGER Analytical sensitivity >99.99%; Analytical specificity 99.99%.

MLPA Analytical sensitivity >99.99%; Analytical specificity 99.99%.

Clinical sensitivity (proportion of positive tests if the disease is present) and clinical specificity (proportion of negative tests if the disease is not present)

Clinical sensitivity: variations in the aforementioned genes are linked to Marfan-like syndromes, but may be individual variations (identified in one or a few families) and total epidemiological data is therefore not available.

Clinical specificity: data not available.

Prescription appropriateness

The genetic test is appropriate when:

the patient meets the diagnostic criteria for a Marfan-like syndrome;

the sensitivity of the test is greater than or equal to that of tests described in the literature.

Clinical utility
Clinical managementUtility
Confirmation of clinical diagnosisYes
Differential diagnosisYes
Couple risk assessmentYes
Availability of clinical trials can be checked on-line at htps://clinicaltrials.gov/
eISSN:
2564-615X
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Life Sciences, Genetics, Biotechnology, Bioinformatics, other