[
Beaugrande de, R.-A., & Dressler, W. U. (1990). Wstęp do lingwistyki tekstu. Warszawa: PWN [English edition (1990). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boni, M. (2017). Introduction. Worlds, today. In M. Boni (Ed.), World building. Transmedia, fans, industries (pp. 9—27). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruhn, S. (2000). Musical ekphrasis: Composers responding to poetry and painting. Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, E. (2009). Possible worlds — Text worlds — Discourse worlds in a dialogic context. In E. Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, & A. Gołda-Derejczyk (Eds.), The contextuality of language and culture (pp. 157—171). Bielsko-Biała: Wydawnictwo WSEH.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, E. (2016). Światy możliwe w tekście literackim i “tekście” malarskim oraz ich niedookreślenie. Przyczynek semiotyczny do semantyki światów możliwych [Possible worlds in a literary text and a visual “text” and their indeterminacy. A semiotic contribution to possible-worlds semantics]. In A. Iskra-Paczkowska, S. Gałkowski, & M. Stanisz (Eds.), Filozofia w literaturze. Literatura w filozofii 2. Światy możliwe. Projekty [Philosophy in literature. Literature in philosophy 2. Possible worlds. Projects] (pp. 50—69). Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, E. (2019). Visual narrativity and the creation of a text world — A semiotic study of selected cases of transmediality. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 136(4), 287—296. DOI: 10.446 7/20834624SL.19.020.11313.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, E. (2022). Crossing the textual frame and its transmedial effects. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 24, 9—21. DOI: 10.26565/2218—2926—2022—24—01.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doležel, L. (1989). Possible worlds and literary fictions. In S. Allén (Ed.), Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences (pp. 221—242). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doležel, L. (1995). Fictional worlds. Density, gaps and inference. Style, 29(2, Summer), 1—14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U. (1979/1994). Lector in fabula. Współdziałanie w interpretacji tekstów narracyjnych [Cooperation in the interpretation of narrative texts]. Warszawa: PIW.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elleström, L. (2014). Media transformation. The transfer of media characteristics among media. Houndmills, Basingstoke (UK) & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Enkvist, N. E. (1989). Connexity, interpretability, universes of discourse, and text worlds. In S. Allén (Ed.), Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences (pp. 162—186). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Francis, C. (2020). How many senses do we have? Retrieved from https://sensorytrust.org.uk/blog/how-many-senses-do-we-have. Accessed 20 April 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Genette, G. (1966). Frontières du récit. Communications, 8(8), 152—163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen-Löve,A. A.(1983). Intermedialität und Intertextualität: Probleme der Korrelation von Wort- und Bildkunst: Am Beispiel der russichen Moderne. In W. Schmid, & W.-D. Stempel (Eds.), Dialog der Texte: Hamburger Kolloquium zur Intertextualität. Vienna: Gesellschaft zur Förderung slawistischer Studien.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hausman, C. R. (1989/1991). Metaphor and art: Interactionism and Reference in the Verbal and Nonverbal Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hintikka, J. (1969). Models for modalities. Selected essays. Dordrecht: Reidel.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hintikka, J. (1989). Exploring possible worlds. In S. Allén (Ed.), Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences (pp. 52—73). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváth, G. (2016). A passion for order: Classifications for narrative imagery in art history and beyond. Visual Past, special issue Visual Narratives — Cultural Identities, 3(1), 247—278.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jahn, M. (2005). Freytag’s triangle. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 189—190). London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kibédi-Varga, A. (1989). Discours, récit, image. Liège & Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kripke, S. A. (1963/1971). Semantical considerations on modal logic. In L. Linsky (Ed.), Reference and modality (pp. 63—72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lessing, G. E. (1766/2012). Laokoon, czyli o granicach malarstwa i poezji. Kraków: Universitas [English edition: (1984). Laocöon; An essay on the limits of painting and poetry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, W., & Zlatev, J. (2022). Intersemiotic translation from fairy tale to sculpture: An exploration of secondary narrativity. Sign System Studies, 50(2/3), 317—345. DOI: 10.12697/SSS.3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lotman, Yu. M., & Uspensky, B. A. (1978). On the semiotic mechanism of culture. New Literary History, 9(2) (Winter 1978), 211—232.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milosz, Cz. (1955/1981). The Issa Valley. A novel. Translated from the Polish by L. Iribarne. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pimenta, S., & Poovaiah, R. (2010). On defining visual narratives. Design Thoughts, August 2010, 25—46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prince, G. (1987/2003). Minimal narrative. In G. Prince (Ed.), A dictionary of narratology. Revised edition (p. 53). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rajewsky, I. O. (2002). Intermedialität. Tübingen & Basel: A. Francke.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rajewsky, I. O. (2005). Intermediality, intertextuality, and remediation: A literary perspective on intermediality. Intermédialités, 6, 43—64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramayana. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramayana. Accessed 02 February 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rescher, N. (1975). A theory of possibility. A constructivistic and conceptualistic account of possible individuals and possible worlds. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rescher, N. (1999). How many possible worlds are there? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59(2), 403—420.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, M.-L. (2005a). Mode. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 315—316). London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, M.-L. (2005b). Possible-worlds theory. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 446—450). London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, M.-L. (2005c). Tellability. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 589—591). London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, M.-L. (2014/2019). Narration in various media. In P. Hühn et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University (n. pag.). Retrieved from http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de. Accessed 02 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, M.-L., & Thon, J.-N. (2014). Introduction. In M.-L. Ryan, & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), Storyworlds across media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology (pp. 1—21). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Semino, E. (1997). Language & world creation in poems & other texts. London & New York: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shakespeare, W. (MCMXLVII/1947). The works of William Shakespeare gathered into one volume. London: The Shakespeare Head Press, Odhams Press and Basil Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheridan, A. (1981). Poland’s poet. London Review of Books, 3(24), n. pag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sonesson, G. (1997). Mute narratives: New issues in the study of pictorial texts. In U.-B. Lagerroth, H. Lund, & E. Hedling (Eds.), Interart Poetics. Essays on the Interrelations of the Arts and Media (pp. 243—251). Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Speidel, K. (2013). Can a single still picture tell a story? Definitions of narrative and the alleged problem of time with single still pictures. Diegesis, Interdisciplinary E-Journal for Narrative Research, 2(1), 173—194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Speidel, K. (2018). What narrative is. Reconsidering definitions based on experiments with pictorial narrative. An essay in descriptive narratology. Frontiers of Narrative Studies, 4(s1), 76—104. DOI:10.1515/fns-2018-0033.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spolsky, E. (1993). Gaps in nature. Literary interpretation and the modular mind. Albany: State University of New York Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stampoulidis, G. (2019). Stories of resistance in Greek street art: A cognitive-semiotic approach. The Public Journal of Semiotics, 8(2), 29—48. DOI: 10.37693/pjos.2018.8.19872.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thompson, J. (2006). Jak czytać malarstwo współczesne. Rozwiązywanie zagadek, rozumienie i smakowanie dzieł mistrzów od Courbeta do Warhola. Kraków: Universitas. [English edition: (2006). How to read a modern painting. Understanding and enjoying the modern masters. Ghent: Ludion].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Todorov, T. (1971). Poétique de la prose. Paris: Seuil.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toolan, M. (2001). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. 2nd ed. London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Top 25 quotes by Joan Miro. Retrieved from https://www.azquotes.com/author/10188-Joan_Miro. Accessed 17 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uspensky, B. (1973/1977). Strukturalna wspólnota różnych rodzajów sztuki (na przykładzie malarstwa i literatury) [Structural community of various art forms (on the example of painting and literature)]. In E. Janus, & M. R. Mayenowa (Eds.), Semiotyka kultury [Semiotics of culture] (pp. 211—242). Warszawa: PIW.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, W. C. (1928). The great figure. Retrieved from https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/51549/the-great-figure. Accessed 17 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Werth, p. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow (UK): Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolf, W. (1999). The musicalization of fiction: A study in the theory and history of intermediality. Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolf, W. (2005a). Intermediality. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 252—256). London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolf, W. (2005b). Pictorial narrativity. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 431—435). London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar