The Honest Weasel A Guide for Successful Weaseling

Azzouni, Jody. 2009. Evading truth commitments: the problem reanalyzed. Logique & Analyse 206: 139–76.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Alan. 2005. Are there genuine mathematical explanations of physical phenomena? Mind 114: 223–38.10.1093/mind/fzi223Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Alan. 2009. Mathematical explanation in science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 611–33.10.1093/bjps/axp025Search in Google Scholar

Colyvan, Mark. 2001. The Indispensability of Mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019513754X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Colyvan, Mark. 2010. There is no easy road to nominalism. Mind 119: 285–306.10.1093/mind/fzq014Search in Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814563Search in Google Scholar

Knowles, Robert. 2015. Heavy duty Platonism. Erkenntnis 80: 1255–70.10.1007/s10670-015-9723-4Search in Google Scholar

Knowles, Robert; and Liggins, David. 2015. Good weasel hunting. Synthese 192: 3397–412.10.1007/s11229-015-0711-7Search in Google Scholar

Leng, Mary. 2002. What’s wrong with indispensability? Synthese 131: 395–418.10.1023/A:1016141509719Search in Google Scholar

Liggins, David. 2012. Weaseling and the content of acience. Mind 121: 997–1005.10.1093/mind/fzs112Search in Google Scholar

Lyon, Aidan; and Colyvan, Mark. 2008. The explanatory power of phase spaces. Philosophia Mathematica 16: 227–43.10.1093/philmat/nkm025Search in Google Scholar

Maddy, Penelope. 1992. Indispensability and practice. The Journal of Philosophy 89: 275–89.10.2307/2026712Search in Google Scholar

Maddy, Penelope. 1997. Naturalism in Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maxwell, Grover. 1962. The ontological status of theoretical entities. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Melia, Joseph. 2000. Weaseling away the indispensability argument. Mind 109: 455–80.10.1093/mind/109.435.455Search in Google Scholar

Melia, Joseph. 2002. Response to Colyvan. Mind 111: 75–80.10.1093/mind/111.441.75Search in Google Scholar

Pincock, Christopher. 2004. A revealing flaw in Colyvan’s indispensability argument. Philosophy of Science 71: 61–79.10.1086/381413Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1971. Philosophy of Logic. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1962. What theories are not. In Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, ed. by E. Nagel, P. Suppes and A. Tarski. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W.V. 1948. On what there is. Review of Metaphysics 2: 21–38.Search in Google Scholar

Raley, Yvonne. 2012. Why the weasel fails. Philosophia Mathematica 20: 339–45.10.1093/philmat/nks017Search in Google Scholar

Saatsi, Juha. 2011. The enhanced indispensability argument: representational versus explanatory role of mathematics in science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 143–54.10.1093/bjps/axq029Search in Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott. 1993. Mathematics and indispensability. The Philosophical Review 102: 35–57.10.2307/2185652Search in Google Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The Scientiic Image. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar