The Connection between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Respect for Human Rights

Addo, M. K. (2014). The Reality of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 14(1), 133–147.AddoM. K.2014The Reality of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human RightsHuman Rights Law Review14113314710.1093/hrlr/ngt041Search in Google Scholar

Arkani, S.; Theobald, R. (2005). Corporate involvement in human rights: is it any of their business? Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(3), 190–205.ArkaniSTheobaldR2005Corporate involvement in human rights: is it any of their business?Business Ethics: A European Review14319020510.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00403.xSearch in Google Scholar

Arnold, D. G. (2010). Transnational Corporations and the Duty to Respect Basic Human Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 371–399.ArnoldD. G.2010Transnational Corporations and the Duty to Respect Basic Human RightsBusiness Ethics Quarterly20337139910.5840/beq201020327Search in Google Scholar

Bilchitz, D. (2013). A chasm between ‘is’ and ‘ought’? A critique of the normative foundations of the SRSG's Framework and the Guiding Principles. In Deva, S.; Bilchitz, D. (eds.). Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.BilchitzD.2013A chasm between ‘is’ and ‘ought‘? A critique of the normative foundations of the SRSG's Framework and the Guiding PrinciplesDevaS.BilchitzD.(eds.)Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect?CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9781139568333.009Search in Google Scholar

Buhmann, K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: what role for law? Some aspects of law and CSR. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(2), 188–202.BuhmannK.2006Corporate social responsibility: what role for law? Some aspects of law and CSRCorporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society6218820210.1108/14720700610655187Search in Google Scholar

Buhmann, K. (2011). Integrating human rights in emerging regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: the EU case. International Journal of Law in Context, 7(2), 139–179.BuhmannK.2011Integrating human rights in emerging regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: the EU caseInternational Journal of Law in Context7213917910.1017/S1744552311000048Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, T. (2006). A human rights approach to developing voluntary codes of conduct for multinational corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 255–269.CampbellT.2006A human rights approach to developing voluntary codes of conduct for multinational corporationsBusiness Ethics Quarterly16225526910.5840/beq200616225Search in Google Scholar

Carasco, E. F.; Singh, J. B. (2008) Human Rights in Global Business Ethics Codes. Business & Society Review, 113(3), 347–374.CarascoE. F.SinghJ. B.2008Human Rights in Global Business Ethics CodesBusiness & Society Review11333473710.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00324.xSearch in Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.CarrollA. B.1979A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate PerformanceThe Academy of Management Review4449750510.2307/257850Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CarrollA. B.1991The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational StakeholdersBusiness Horizons344394810.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-GSearch in Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities (2001, July 18). Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility, COM(2001)366.Commission of the European Communities2001July18Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibilityCOM(2001)366Search in Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities (2006, March 22). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee – Implementing the partnership for growth and jobs: making Europe a pole of excellence on corporate social responsibility, COM(2006)136 final.Commission of the European Communities2006March22Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee – Implementing the partnership for growth and jobs: making Europe a pole of excellence on corporate social responsibilityCOM(2006)136 finalSearch in Google Scholar

Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law. (2017). Retrieved May 31, 2018, from http://www.respect.international/french-corporate-duty-of-vigilance-law-english-translation/.Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law2017Retrieved May 31, 2018, from http://www.respect.international/french-corporate-duty-of-vigilance-law-english-translation/Search in Google Scholar

Čertanec, A. (2015). Varstvo človekovih pravic pri delovanju gospodarskih subjektov po Smernicah Združenih narodov. Ljubljana.ČertanecA.2015Varstvo človekovih pravic pri delovanju gospodarskih subjektov po Smernicah Združenih narodovLjubljanaSearch in Google Scholar

Economic and Social Council (2006, February 22). Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises‘, E/CN.4/2006/97.Economic and Social Council2006February22Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises‘E/CN.4/2006/97Search in Google Scholar

Cragg, W. (2012). Ethics, Enlightened Self-Interest, and the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: A Critical Look at the Justificatory Foundations of the UN Framework. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 9–36.CraggW.2012Ethics, Enlightened Self-Interest, and the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: A Critical Look at the Justificatory Foundations of the UN FrameworkBusiness Ethics Quarterly22193610.5840/beq20122213Search in Google Scholar

De la Vega, C.; Mehra, A. (2009). International Legal Accountability over Non-State Actors: An Analysis of the Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General. Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte, 3(2), 26–40.De la VegaCMehraA2009International Legal Accountability over Non-State Actors: An Analysis of the Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary GeneralZeitschrift für Menschenrechte322640Search in Google Scholar

Emeseh, E.; Songi, O. (2014). CSR, human rights abuse and sustainability report accountability. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(2), 136–151.EmesehESongiO2014CSR, human rights abuse and sustainability report accountabilityInternational Journal of Law and Management56213615110.1108/IJLMA-01-2013-0001Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2011, October 25). A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, COM(2011)681.European Commission2011October25A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social ResponsibilityCOM(2011)681Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2012, November 30). My business and human rights: A guide to human rights for small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from http://accessfacility.org/my-business-and-human-rights-guide-human-rights-small-and-medium-sized-enterprises.European Commission2012November30My business and human rights: A guide to human rights for small and medium-sized enterprisesRetrieved July 31, 2017, from http://accessfacility.org/my-business-and-human-rights-guide-human-rights-small-and-medium-sized-enterprisesSearch in Google Scholar

European Parliament and Council (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, OJ L 330/1.European Parliament and Council2014Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groupsOJ L 330/1Search in Google Scholar

GRI (2008). Reporting on Human Rights. Amsterdam: GRI.GRI2008Reporting on Human RightsAmsterdamGRISearch in Google Scholar

GRI (2017). GRI Standards. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from www.globalreporting.org/standards.GRI2017GRI StandardsRetrieved July 31, 2017, from www.globalreporting.org/standardsSearch in Google Scholar

GRI (2019). GRI 412: Human Rights Assessment. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/gri-412-human-rights-assessment/.GRI2019GRI 412: Human Rights AssessmentRetrieved March 1, 2019, from www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/gri-412-human-rights-assessment/Search in Google Scholar

Hsieh, N. (2015). Should Business Have Human Rights Obligations? Journal of Human Rights, 14(2), 218–236.HsiehN.2015Should Business Have Human Rights Obligations?Journal of Human Rights14221823610.1080/14754835.2015.1007223Search in Google Scholar

Human Rights Council (2011, March 21). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, A/HRC/17/31.Human Rights Council2011March21Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” FrameworkA/HRC/17/31Search in Google Scholar

Institute for Human Rights and Business (2011). The ‘State of Play’ of Human Rights Due Diligence: Anticipating the Next Five Years. London: Institute for Human Rights and Business.Institute for Human Rights and Business2011The ‘State of Play’ of Human Rights Due Diligence: Anticipating the Next Five YearsLondonInstitute for Human Rights and BusinessSearch in Google Scholar

International Organization for Standardization (2010, November 1). ISO 26000 – Guidance on social responsibility. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html.International Organization for Standardization2010November1ISO 26000 – Guidance on social responsibilityRetrieved July 31, 2017, from https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Fasterling, B.; Demuijnck, G. (2013). Human Rights in the Void? Due Diligence in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 799–814.FasterlingBDemuijnckG2013Human Rights in the Void? Due Diligence in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human RightsJournal of Business Ethics11679981410.1007/s10551-013-1822-zSearch in Google Scholar

Jenkins, R. (2001, April). Corporate Codes of Conduct Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Technology, Business and Society Programme Paper Number 2. Retrieved July 31, 2015, from www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/E3B3E78BAB9A886F80256B5-E00344278/$file/jenkins.pdf.JenkinsR.2001AprilCorporate Codes of Conduct Self-Regulation in a Global EconomyUnited Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Technology, Business and Society Programme Paper Number 2. Retrieved July 31, 2015, from www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/E3B3E78BAB9A886F80256B5-E00344278/$file/jenkins.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Kamminga, M. T. (2016). Company Responses to Human Rights Reports: An Empirical Analysis. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(1), 95–110.KammingaM. T.2016Company Responses to Human Rights Reports: An Empirical AnalysisBusiness and Human Rights Journal119511010.1017/bhj.2015.2Search in Google Scholar

Kinley, D.; Tadaki, J. (2003–2004). From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 44(4), 931–1023.KinleyDTadakiJ2003–2004From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International LawVirginia Journal of International Law4449311023Search in Google Scholar

Korže, B. (1993). Ustavni temelji podjetništva. Podjetje in Delo, 19 (5/6), 461–468.KoržeB.1993Ustavni temelji podjetništvaPodjetje in Delo195/6461468Search in Google Scholar

Korže, B. (2006). Do takeovers downgrade the contents of human rights and freedoms in EU? The IPSI BgD Transactions on Advanced Research, 2(1), 51–60.KoržeB.2006Do takeovers downgrade the contents of human rights and freedoms in EU?The IPSI BgD Transactions on Advanced Research215160Search in Google Scholar

Korže, B. (2014). Obligations of the social market state and business entities according to the EU guiding principles. International Journal of Business and Public Administration, 11(2), 1–22.KoržeB.2014Obligations of the social market state and business entities according to the EU guiding principlesInternational Journal of Business and Public Administration112122Search in Google Scholar

Letnar Černič, J. (2003). Mednarodnopravna odgovornost multinacionalnih družb za kršenje temeljnih človekovih pravic. Pamfil, 25–28.Letnar ČerničJ.2003Mednarodnopravna odgovornost multinacionalnih družb za kršenje temeljnih človekovih pravicPamfil2528Search in Google Scholar

Letnar Černič, J. (2009). Družbena odgovornost gospodarskih družb. Pravna praksa, 28(27), 9–11.Letnar ČerničJ.2009Družbena odgovornost gospodarskih družbPravna praksa2827911Search in Google Scholar

Letnar Černič, J. (2011). Corporate Human Rights Obligations: Towards Binding International Legal Obligations? Dignitas, 49/50, 55–104.Letnar ČerničJ.2011Corporate Human Rights Obligations: Towards Binding International Legal Obligations?Dignitas49/5055104Search in Google Scholar

Lund-Thomsen, P. (2008). The Global Sourcing and Codes of Conduct Debate: Five Myths and Five Recommendations. Development and Change, 39 (6), 1005–1018.Lund-ThomsenP.2008The Global Sourcing and Codes of Conduct Debate: Five Myths and Five RecommendationsDevelopment and Change3961005101810.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00526.xSearch in Google Scholar

Matten, D.; Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.MattenDMoonJ2008“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social ResponsibilityAcademy of Management Review33240442410.5465/amr.2008.31193458Search in Google Scholar

McBeth, A. (2010). International Economic Actors and Human Rights. London, New York: Routledge.McBethA.2010International Economic Actors and Human RightsLondon, New YorkRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar

McBeth, A.; Joseph, S. (2005). Same Words, Different Language: Corporate Perceptions of Human Rights Responsibilities. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 11(2), 95–127.McBethAJosephS2005Same Words, Different Language: Corporate Perceptions of Human Rights ResponsibilitiesAustralian Journal of Human Rights1129512710.1080/1323238X.2005.11910809Search in Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 385–400.McCorquodaleR.2009Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights LawJournal of Business Ethics8738540010.1007/s10551-009-0296-5Search in Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R.; Smit, L.; Neely, S.; Brooks, R. (2017). Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business Enterprises. Business and Human Rights Journal, 2(2), 195–224.McCorquodaleR.SmitL.NeelyS.BrooksR.2017Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business EnterprisesBusiness and Human Rights Journal2219522410.1017/bhj.2017.2Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands (2014). National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. Hague: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands2014National Action Plan on Business and Human RightsHagueMinistry of Foreign AffairsSearch in Google Scholar

Monshipouri, M. et al (2003). Multinational Corporations and the Ethics of Global Responsibility: Problems and Possibilities. Human Rights Quarterly, 25 (4), 965–989.MonshipouriM.2003Multinational Corporations and the Ethics of Global Responsibility: Problems and PossibilitiesHuman Rights Quarterly25496598910.4324/9781315252964-5Search in Google Scholar

Muchlinski, P. (2001). Human rights and multinationals: is there a problem? International Affairs, 77 (1), 31–47.MuchlinskiP.2001Human rights and multinationals: is there a problem?International Affairs771314710.4324/9781315252964-1Search in Google Scholar

Obara, Louise J. (2017). “What Does This Mean”?: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Right. Business and Human Rights Journals, 2(2), 249–273.ObaraLouise J.2017“What Does This Mean”?: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human RightBusiness and Human Rights Journals2224927310.1017/bhj.2017.7Search in Google Scholar

Obara, L. J.; Peattie, K. (2017). Bridging the Great Divide? Making Sense of the Human Rights-CSR Relationship in UK Multinational Companies. Journal of World Business, 53(6), 781–793.ObaraL. J.PeattieK.2017Bridging the Great Divide? Making Sense of the Human Rights-CSR Relationship in UK Multinational CompaniesJournal of World Business53678179310.1016/j.jwb.2017.10.002Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264115415-en.OECD2011OECD Guidelines for Multinational EnterprisesRetrieved July 31, 2017, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264115415-en10.1787/9789264115415-enSearch in Google Scholar

Pedersen, E. R.; Andersen, M. (2006). Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Public Affairs, (3/4), 228–240.PedersenE. R.AndersenM.2006Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationshipsJournal of Public Affairs3/422824010.1002/pa.232Search in Google Scholar

Porter, M. E.; Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.PorterM. E.KramerM. R.2006Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social ResponsibilityHarvard Business Review84127892Search in Google Scholar

Preuss, L.; Brown, D. (2012). Business Policies on Human Rights: An Analysis of Their Content and Prevalence Among FTSE 100 Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 289–299.PreussLBrownD2012Business Policies on Human Rights: An Analysis of Their Content and Prevalence Among FTSE 100 FirmsJournal of Business Ethics109328929910.1007/s10551-011-1127-zSearch in Google Scholar

Rabet, D. (2009). Human Rights and Globalization: The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 1(2), 463–475.RabetD.2009Human Rights and Globalization: The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility?Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences12463475Search in Google Scholar

Ramasastry, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility Versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap Between Responsibility and Accountability. Journal of Human Rights, 14(2), 237–259.RamasastryA.2015Corporate Social Responsibility Versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap Between Responsibility and AccountabilityJournal of Human Rights14223725910.1080/14754835.2015.1037953Search in Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (1st ed.). New York and London: Norton.RuggieJ. G.2013Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights1st edNew York and LondonNortonSearch in Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. S.; Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.SchwartzM. S.CarrollA. B.2003Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain ApproachBusiness Ethics Quarterly13450353010.5840/beq200313435Search in Google Scholar

Soh, C. (2013). Extending Corporate Liability to Human Rights Violations in Asia. Journal of International and Area Studies, 20(1), 23–38.SohC.2013Extending Corporate Liability to Human Rights Violations in AsiaJournal of International and Area Studies2012338Search in Google Scholar

Steiner, J. F.; Steiner, G. A. (2003). Business, Government, And Society: A Managerial Perspective (10th ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irvin.SteinerJ. F.SteinerG. A.2003Business, Government, And Society: A Managerial Perspective10th edBostonMcGraw-Hill/IrvinSearch in Google Scholar

Taylor, M. B. (2011). The Ruggie Framework: Polycentric regulation and the implications for corporate social responsibility. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics / Etikk i praksis, 5(1), 9–30.TaylorM. B.2011The Ruggie Framework: Polycentric regulation and the implications for corporate social responsibilityNordic Journal of Applied Ethics / Etikk i praksis5193010.5324/eip.v5i1.1731Search in Google Scholar

The Companies Act. (2013). Retrieved July 31, 2017, from www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CompaniesAct2013.pdf.The Companies Act2013Retrieved July 31, 2017, from www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CompaniesAct2013.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

United Nations (1983, May 21). UN Draft Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations, E/1983/17/Rev. 1.United Nations1983May21UN Draft Code of Conduct on Transnational CorporationsE/1983/17/Rev. 1Search in Google Scholar

UN Global Compact (2017a). The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles.UN Global Compact2017aThe Ten Principles of the UN Global CompactRetrieved July 31, 2017, from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principlesSearch in Google Scholar

UN Global Compact (2017b). Principle One: Human Rights. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles/principle-1.UN Global Compact2017bPrinciple One: Human RightsRetrieved July 31, 2017, from www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles/principle-1Search in Google Scholar

UN Global Compact and Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2017). The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Relationship to UN Global Compact Commitments. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from www.global-compact.de/sites/default/files/jahr/publikation/UNGPs_gc_note.pdf.UN Global Compact and Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights2017The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Relationship to UN Global Compact CommitmentsRetrieved July 31, 2017, from www.global-compact.de/sites/default/files/jahr/publikation/UNGPs_gc_note.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

United Nations: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2012, June). The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive Guide, HR/PUB/12/02.United Nations: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights2012JuneThe Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive GuideHR/PUB/12/02Search in Google Scholar

Van Huijstee, M. et al (2012, November). How to Use the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in Company Research and Advocacy – A Guide for Civil Society Organisations. Retrieved March 1, 2016, from https://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/English-version.pdf.Van HuijsteeM.2012NovemberHow to Use the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in Company Research and Advocacy – A Guide for Civil Society OrganisationsRetrieved March 1, 2016, from https://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/English-version.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Weissbrodt, D. (2005). Business and Human Rights. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 74, 55–73.WeissbrodtD.2005Business and Human RightsUniversity of Cincinnati Law Review74557310.4324/9781315252964-4Search in Google Scholar

Wettstein, F. (2009). Beyond Voluntariness, Beyond CSR: Making a Case for Human. Rights and Justice. Business and Society Review, 114(1), 125–152.WettsteinF.2009Beyond Voluntariness, Beyond CSR: Making a Case for Human. Rights and JusticeBusiness and Society Review114112515210.1111/j.1467-8594.2009.00338.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wettstein, F. (2012). CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 739–770.WettsteinF.2012CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great DivideBusiness Ethics Quarterly22473977010.5840/beq201222446Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, S. (2015). Global production, CSR and human rights: the courts of public opinion and the social licence to operate. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(6), 757–778.WheelerS.2015Global production, CSR and human rights: the courts of public opinion and the social licence to operateThe International Journal of Human Rights19675777810.1080/13642987.2015.1016712Search in Google Scholar

World Conference on Human Rights (1993, June 25). Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, A/CONF.15/23.World Conference on Human Rights1993June25Vienna Declaration and Programme of ActionA/CONF.15/23Search in Google Scholar

Wright, M.; Lehr, A. (2006, December 12). Business Recognition of Human Rights: Global Patterns, Regional and Sectoral Variations. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from www.reports-and-materials.org/Business-Recognition-of-Human-Rights-12-Dec-2006.pdf.WrightMLehrA2006December12Business Recognition of Human Rights: Global Patterns, Regional and Sectoral VariationsCorporate Social Responsibility Initiative. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from www.reports-and-materials.org/Business-Recognition-of-Human-Rights-12-Dec-2006.pdfSearch in Google Scholar