[
Agnoli, S. (2024). IDHOL, a holistic model for the analysis of individual differences in the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agnoli, S., Corazza, G.E., & Runco, M.A. (2016). Estimating creativity with a multiple-measurement approach within scientific and artistic domains. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 171–176.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andreasen, N.C. & Ramchandran, K. (2012). Creativity in art and science: are there two cultures? Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 14(1), 49–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ara, R. (2015). Unruly Practices: The History of Torture throughout the Ages. Dhaka Univ. Stud. Part F, 26, 75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baas, M., Roskes, M., Koch, S., Cheng, Y., & De Dreu, C.K. (2019). Why social threat motivates malevolent creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(11), 1590–1602.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (2011). Moral disengagement. In D.J. Christie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (2016). Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves. Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). JAI Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 60–69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Iafrate, C., Beretta, M., Steca, P., & Bandura, A. (2006). La misura del disimpegno morale nel contesto delle trasgressioni dell’agire quotidiano. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 33(1), 83–106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, R., Lu, K., & Hao, N. (2021). The effect of anger on malevolent creativity and strategies for its emotion regulation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(8), 847.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corazza, G.E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creative Research Journal, 28 (3), 258–267
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropley, D.H., Kaufman, J.C., & Cropley, A.J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropley, D.H., Kaufman, J.C., White, A.E., & Chiera, B.A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 400–412.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunn, A.M., Heggestad, E.D., Shanock, L.R., & Theilgard, N. (2018). Intra-individual Response Variability as an Indicator of Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparison to Other Indicators and Relationships with Individual Differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(1), 105–121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gao, Z., Cheng, L., Li, J., Chen, Q., & Hao, N. (2022). The dark side of creativity: Neural correlates of malevolent creative idea generation. Neuropsychologia, 167, 108164.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., & Runco, M.A. (2016). A new tool to measure malevolent creativity: The malevolent creativity behavior scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 682.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, D.J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J.C. (2013). The effect of emotional intelligence and task type on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 237.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, D.J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and furious: The influence of implicit aggression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 54–64
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jonason, P.K., Foster, J.D., Egorova, M.S., Parshikova, O., Csathó, Á., Oshio, A., & Gouveia, V.V. (2017). The dark triad traits from a life history perspective in six countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1476.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapoor, H., & Kaufman, J.C. (2022). The evil within: The AMORAL model of dark creativity. Theory & Psychology, 32(3), 467–490.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapoor, H., & Kaufman, J.C. (2022). Unbound: The relationship among creativity, moral foundations, and dark personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(2), 182–193.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keem, S., Shalley, C.E., Kim, E., & Jeong, I. (2018). Are creative individuals bad apples? A dual pathway model of unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(4), 416.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, S.A. & Dow, G.T. (2011). Malevolent creativity: Does personality influence malicious divergent thinking? Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 73–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lubart, T., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1(2), 41–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mastria, S., Agnoli, S., Zanon, M., Lubart, T., & Corazza, G.E. (2018). Creative brain, creative mind, creative person. In Kapoula, Z., Renoult, j., Volle, E., & Andreatta, M. (Eds.), Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Science (pp. 3–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moore, C. (2015). Moral disengagement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 199–204.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nelson, J., & Botella, M. (2017). The multivariate approach and design of the creative process. Creativity, design thinking and interdisciplinarity, 101–113
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perchtold-Stefan, C.M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., & Papousek, I. (2020). Motivational factors in the typical display of humor and creative potential: The case of malevolent creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 543948.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perchtold-Stefan, C.M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., & Papousek, I. (2021). Creative, antagonistic, and angry? Exploring the roots of malevolent creativity with a real-world idea generation task. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 710–722.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perchtold-Stefan, C.M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., & Papousek, I. (2022). Social exclusion increases antisocial tendencies: Evidence from retaliatory ideation in a malevolent creativity task. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(6), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000500
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A., Plucker, J.A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 393–400.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A., Illies, J.J., & Eisenman, R. (2005). Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 137–148.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A. & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco M.A. & Pagnani A.R. (2011). Psychological research on creativity. In The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 63–71). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shi, Z., Zhou, Z., Tian, L., Zhu, Y., Liu, C., & Xu, L. (2023). What causes malevolent creative people to engage in malevolent behaviors? Mediating role of moral disengagement and moderating effects of conscience. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 101329.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silvia, P.J., Winterstein, B.P., Willse, J.T., Barona, C.M., Cram, J.T., Hess, K.I., … & Richard, C.A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simonton, D.K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 97–106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit—A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tillman, C.J., Gonzalez, K., Whitman, M.V., Crawford, W.S., & Hood, A.C. (2018). A multi-functional view of moral disengagement: Exploring the effects of learning the consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2286.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, L. (2019). Creativity as a pragmatic moral tool. Journal of Business Research, 96, 1–13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yentes, R.D., & Wilhelm, F. (2018). careless: Procedures for computing indices of careless responding. R packages version 1.2.2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhao, J., Xu, X., & Pang, W. (2022). When do creative people engage in malevolent behaviors? The moderating role of moral reasoning. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, 111386.
]Search in Google Scholar