[
Batkowska J. & Brodacki A. (2017): Selected quality traits of eggs and the productivity of newly-created laying hens dedicated to extensive system of rearing. Archives Animal Breeding, 60: 87-93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council Directive (1999/74/EC): Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 203: 53-57. Available at: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/eur34973.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dalle Zotte A., Sartori A., Bordesan V. (2013): Physical egg quality from organic versus conventional laying hens. Proceedings of the 15th European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products, 15-19 September 2013, Bergamo, Italy, 1-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dedousi A., Đukić Stojčić M., Sossidou E. (2020): Effects of housing systems on keel bone damage and egg quality of laying hens. Veterinary Research Forum, 11(4): 299-304.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Đukić Stojčić M., Perić L., Milošević N., Bjedov S. (2015): The eggs quality from organic and conventional production. Book of Abstracts, 4th International Symposium and 20th Scientific professional Conference of Agronomists of Republic of Srpska, 2-6 March 2015, Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 195.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Englmaierová M., Tumová E., Charvátová V., Skrivan M. (2014): Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59: 345-352.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2022). EU Market Situation for Eggs, 17 February 2022, European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets: Brussels.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guyonnet V. (2012): Eggs and egg products: Consumers’ attitudes, perceptions and behaviours. Proceedings of the 24th World’s Poultry Congress, 5-9 August 2012, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 1-10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kralik Z., Radišić Ž., Grčević M., Kralik G. (2013): Comparison of Table Eggs Quality Originating from Hens Kept in Different Housing Systems. 21st European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat and 15th European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products, WPSA, 15-19 September 2013, Bergamo, Italy, 1-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewko L. & Gronowicz E. (2011): Effect of housing system on egg quality in laying hens. Annals of Animal Science, 11(4): 607-616.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molnár S. & Szollosi L. (2020): Sustainability and quality aspects of different table egg production systems: a literature review. Sustainability, 12: 7884.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perić L., Đukić Stojčić M., Milošević N., Bjedov S. (2015): Effects of different housing systems on quality of table eggs. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress New Perspectives and Challenges of Sustainable Livestock Production, 7-9 October 2015, Belgrade, Serbia, 558-564.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sekeroglu A. (2002): The effects of free range system on egg productions and egg quality of Brown and White Layer genotypes. PhD Thesis, Gaziosmanpasa University, Institute of Science, Animal Science Department.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sokołowicz Z., Krawczyk J., Dykiel M. (2018): The effect of the type of alternative housing system, genotype and age of laying hens on egg quality. Annals of Animal Science, 18(2): 541-555.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sokołowicz Z., Krawczyk J., Dykiel M., Augustyńska-Prejsnar A. (2019): Effect of layer genotype on physical characteristics and nutritive value of organic eggs. CyTA - Journal of Food, 17(1): 11-19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terčič D., Žlender B., Holcman A. (2012): External, internal and sensory qualities of table eggs as influenced by two different production system. Agro-knowledge Journal, 13: 555-562.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tůmová E., Englmaierová M., Ledvinka Z., Charvátová V. (2011): Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 56(11): 490-498.
]Search in Google Scholar
