<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Incrementalism and punctuated equilibrium theory (PET) have secured their standing in public policy research when studying change in budgetary data. On the other hand, however, new empirical evidence is constantly developed to confront it with theoretical assumptions. In line with the above, the aim of the paper is threefold. First, it is examined if budgetary outlays in Poland follow either incrementalism or PET's core premises. Second, the paper aims at facilitating discussion on identifying punctuations. It is claimed that any cut-off point should be data-driven, category-responsive, and generalizable across different types of outliers. And third, it is investigated which of the budget categories have the most punctuations. Methodologically, the study is based on descriptive and distributional statistics provided to tackle the above two issues comprehensively. Consequently, the paper aims at filling the gap in theory-driven literature on Polish budget shifts and their empirical rigorous explanations. Thus, it is claimed that the Polish case study contributes to the debate on the verification of empirical research on public policy agendas and public policy change.</p>
</abstract>

Incrementalism and punctuated equilibrium theory (PET) have secured their standing in public policy research when studying change in budgetary data. On the other hand, however, new empirical evidence is constantly developed to confront it with theoretical assumptions. In line with the above, the aim of the paper is threefold. First, it is examined if budgetary outlays in Poland follow either incrementalism or PET's core premises. Second, the paper aims at facilitating discussion on identifying punctuations. It is claimed that any cut-off point should be data-driven, category-responsive, and generalizable across different types of outliers. And third, it is investigated which of the budget categories have the most punctuations. Methodologically, the study is based on descriptive and distributional statistics provided to tackle the above two issues comprehensively. Consequently, the paper aims at filling the gap in theory-driven literature on Polish budget shifts and their empirical rigorous explanations. Thus, it is claimed that the Polish case study contributes to the debate on the verification of empirical research on public policy agendas and public policy change.

Between incrementalism and punctuated equilibrium: the case of budget in Poland, 1995–2018

Institute of American Studies and Polish Diaspora

Central European Journal of Public Policy

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Incrementalism and punctuated equilibrium theory (PET) have secured their standing in public policy research when studying change in budgetary data. On the...

Between incrementalism and punctuated equilibrium: the case of budget in Poland, 1995–2018

Pubblicato online: 02 set 2021

Pagine: 14 - 30

Ricevuto: 05 mag 2020

Accettato: 23 gen 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2021-0007

Parole chiave
public policy, incrementalism, punctuated equilibrium theory, budget analysis, outlier detection

© 2021 Lukasz Wordliczek, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Between incrementalism and punctuated equilibrium: the case of budget in Poland, 1995–2018

Pubblicato online: 02 set 2021

Pagine: 14 - 30

Ricevuto: 05 mag 2020

Accettato: 23 gen 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2021-0007

Parole chiavepublic policy, incrementalism, punctuated equilibrium theory, budget analysis, outlier detection

© 2021 Lukasz Wordliczek, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Parole chiave
public policy, incrementalism, punctuated equilibrium theory, budget analysis, outlier detection