Accesso libero

Workers’ Earnings Losses Due to the Low-Carbon Transition. Theory and Application in a CGE Model

, ,  e   
05 ago 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Figure 1.

GDP and labour compensation loss in Poland due to frictional transition of labour between sectors (percentage difference between the frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition)
GDP and labour compensation loss in Poland due to frictional transition of labour between sectors (percentage difference between the frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition)

Figure 2.

Labour compensation loss for all workers and for miners in Poland due to frictional transition of .labour between sectors (absolute difference between frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition)
Labour compensation loss for all workers and for miners in Poland due to frictional transition of .labour between sectors (absolute difference between frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition)

Figure 3.

GDP (left panel) and labour compensation (right panel) loss in Poland due to frictional transition of labour between sectors (percentage difference between the frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition) for the alternative assumptions regarding elasticity of labour supply at the sectoral level
GDP (left panel) and labour compensation (right panel) loss in Poland due to frictional transition of labour between sectors (percentage difference between the frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition) for the alternative assumptions regarding elasticity of labour supply at the sectoral level

Figure 4.

GDP (left panel) and labour compensation (right panel) loss in Poland due to frictional transition of labour between sectors (percentage difference between the frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition) for the alternative assumptions regarding elasticity of substitution between fossils and electricity
GDP (left panel) and labour compensation (right panel) loss in Poland due to frictional transition of labour between sectors (percentage difference between the frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition) for the alternative assumptions regarding elasticity of substitution between fossils and electricity

Figure 5.

GDP (left panel) and labour compensation (right panel) loss in Poland due to frictional transition of labour between sectors (percentage difference between the frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition) for the alternative assumptions regarding elasticity of substitution between energy composite and the capital-labour composite
GDP (left panel) and labour compensation (right panel) loss in Poland due to frictional transition of labour between sectors (percentage difference between the frictionless decarbonisation simulation and the simulation with frictions throughout the transition) for the alternative assumptions regarding elasticity of substitution between energy composite and the capital-labour composite