Accesso libero

Possibilities of Using Decision Support Systems for Agriculture in Areas with High Agrarian Fragmentation

  
16 apr 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Assessment of the usefulness of functions available within cloud-based farm management systems in the surveyed farms in general and depending on selected farm and respondents’ characteristics [% of responses]

Specification Total Farms with an area of up to 4 ha Farms with an area of over 4 ha Respondents with agricultural education Respondents with education other than agricultural Users of at least one decision support system in total (n=127) Not using decision support systems (n=262)
Possibility to receive information about the risk of plant infection/disease 77.63 65.83 90.00 91.27 70.99 100.00 66.79
Access to an accurate weather forecast for individual agricultural plots 61.95 48.24 76.32 80.95 52.67 92.91 46.95
Possibility to estimate the consumption of raw materials (e.g. consumption of seed, plant protection products, fodder) 61.70 42.71 81.58 86.51 49.62 96.85 44.66
Yield prediction (depending on the resources used, detailed weather forecasts) 58.61 39.20 78.95 80.95 47.71 95.28 40.84
Collecting and storing data sent by sensors about soil moisture, air temperature, and nutrient content in crops 55.27 35.18 76.32 80.16 43.13 95.28 35.88
Remote information exchange with other farmers 48.33 31.66 65.79 68.25 38.55 81.10 32.44
Records of sales, inventories, payments, profits 47.56 24.62 71.58 72.22 35.50 91.34 26.34
Research on the impact of farm activities on the natural environment 37.28 20.10 55.26 61.90 25.19 77.17 17.94
Possibility to collect and process information from systems tracking animals’ behaviour, condition and physical activity 32.13 13.57 51.58 58.73 19.08 66.93 15.27
Remotely assigning tasks to employees 19.54 5.53 34.21 38.89 9.92 51.97 3.82
Remotely receiving information from employees (about the progress of work, problems) 19.28 5.53 33.68 38.10 9.92 50.39 4.20

The area structure of the surveyed farms in comparison to Poland

Area Number of farms [GUS, 2020] Farm structure by size [%]
up to 1 ha inclusive 1 – 5 ha 5 – 10 ha 10 – 15 ha 15 ha and more
Poland 1 316 759 1.87 50.15 21.95 9.91 16.12
Małopolskie voivodeship 126 172 2.54 78.37 13.24 2.79 3.06
Podkarpackie voivodeship 114 182 2.30 76.86 13.75 2.96 4.14
Farms surveyed 389 x 62.98 20.05 7.20 9.77

Characteristics of respondents and surveyed farms in the group in general and depending on farm size [% of responses]

Specification Farm size
Total ≤ 4ha >4ha
Age up to 35 10.80 11.56 10.00
35–50 39.59 32.16 47.37
>50 49.61 56.28 42.63
Respondents’ education Elementary 6.43 9.55 3.16
Vocational agricultural 16.71 9.05 24.74
Vocational other than agricultural 26.99 36.68 16.84
Secondary agricultural 14.14 3.02 25.79
Secondary other than agricultural 23.65 28.64 18.42
Higher agricultural 1.80 0.00 3.68
Higher other than agricultural 10.28 13.07 7.37
Employment On the farm exclusively 58.61 45.73 72.11
On and off the farm 41.39 54.27 27.89
Organisational form Individual farm 99.74 100.00 99.47
Agricultural enterprise 0.26 0.00 0.53
Type of farm Conventional Farm 96.14 97.49 94.74
Organic farm 2.83 2.51 3.16
Farm with integrated production 1.03 0.00 2.10
Dominant production direction Crop production 79.18 90.95 67.08
Animal production 20.57 9.05 32.92

Barriers to the use of decision support applications and cloud-based farm management systems in the study group in general and depending on selected farm and respondents’ characteristics [% of responses]

Specification Total Farms with an area of up to 4 ha Farms with an area of over 4 ha Respondents up to 50 years of age Respondents over 50 years of age Respondents with agricultural education Respondents with education other than agricultural
Financial barrier 55.01 37.19 73.68 66.84 43.01 78.57 43.51
The belief that there is no need to implement such solutions 43.19 67.34 17.89 26.02 60.62 15.87 56.49
Hardware shortages 38.05 26.63 50.00 47.45 28.50 55.56 29.39
The need to improve IT skills 22.11 9.05 35.79 26.02 18.13 31.75 17.56
Lack of trust in such systems and their creators 19.02 20.60 17.37 9.69 28.50 11.11 22.90
Technical problems (the quality of local infrastructure makes it difficult to access high-speed Internet) 16.20 11.56 21.05 23.47 8.81 27.78 10.69
These systems are not intuitive/difficult to use 16.20 5.03 27.89 21.43 10.88 26.19 11.45
Lack of systems that fully meet the needs of farm (too few options available) 13.11 7.54 18.95 20.41 5.70 18.25 10.69
Lack of knowledge of such solutions until taking part in the study 12.85 19.10 6.32 5.10 20.73 9.52 14.50
Lack of access to training in the use of this type of solutions 8.23 1.51 15.26 12.24 4.15 15.87 4.58
Concern about sharing agricultural activity data with applications 7.46 4.02 11.05 8.16 6.74 8.73 6.87
Lack of time to learn how these systems work 5.66 3.52 7.89 7.14 4.15 7.94 4.58
I do not see any barriers to using these solutions 1.29 1.01 1.58 2.04 0.52 0.79 1.53

Chi square test of independence results

Criterion χ2
Assessing the usability of cloud-based farm management system features
Farm size (up to 4 ha; over 4 ha) 28,91*
Education type (agricultural; non-agricultural) 21,39*
Use of decision support systems (Yes; No) 48,80*
Assessment of Barriers to Implementation of Decision Support Systems
Age (up to 50; under 50) 97,55*
Farm size (up to 4 ha; over 4 ha) 65,92*
Education type (agricultural; non-agricultural) 64,36*