This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Ali, M. J., Ahmed, K., & Henry, D. (2004). Disclosure compliance with national accounting standards by listed companies in South Asia. Accounting and Business Research, 34(3), 183–199. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2004.9729963AliM. J.AhmedK.HenryD.2004Disclosure compliance with national accounting standards by listed companies in South Asia34318319910.1080/00014788.2004.9729963Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ali, S., & Aulia, M. R. P. (2015). Audit firm size, auditor industry specialization and audit quality: An empirical study of Indonesian state-owned enterprises. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(22), 1–14. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RJFA/article/view/26912/27595AliS.AuliaM. R. P.2015Audit firm size, auditor industry specialization and audit quality: An empirical study of Indonesian state-owned enterprises622114https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RJFA/article/view/26912/27595Search in Google Scholar
Barkess, L., Simnett, R. (1994). The Provision of Other Services by Auditors: Independence and Pricing Issues. Accounting and Business Research 24(94), 99–108. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1994.9729469BarkessL.SimnettR.1994The Provision of Other Services by Auditors: Independence and Pricing Issues24949910810.1080/00014788.1994.9729469Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cameran, M. (2005). Audit fees and the large auditor premium in the Italian market. International Journal of Auditing, 9(2), 129–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00205.xCameranM.2005Audit fees and the large auditor premium in the Italian market9212914610.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00205.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Working Paper, University of Tennessee. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7300/68a12bf89ad3c-44fe29f836169c092447f35.pdfCarcelloJ. V.NagyA. L.2004Working Paper, University of Tennessee. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7300/68a12bf89ad3c-44fe29f836169c092447f35.pdf10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.55Search in Google Scholar
Carson, E., Fargher, N., Simon, D. T., & Taylor, M. H. (2004). Audit fees and market segmentation–further evidence on how client size matters within the context of audit fee models. International Journal of Auditing, 8(1), 79–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00159.xCarsonE.FargherN.SimonD. T.TaylorM. H.2004Audit fees and market segmentation–further evidence on how client size matters within the context of audit fee models81799110.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00159.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chatterjee, B., & Mir, M. Z. (2008). The current status of environmental reporting by Indian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(6), 609–629. doi: 10.1108/02686900810882138ChatterjeeB.MirM. Z.2008The current status of environmental reporting by Indian companies23660962910.1108/02686900810882138Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Choi, J. H., Kim, C., Kim, J. B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 73–97.ChoiJ. H.KimC.KimJ. B.ZangY.2010Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing291739710.2308/aud.2010.29.1.73Search in Google Scholar
Clatworthy, M. A., & Peel, M. J. (2006). The effect of corporate status on external audit fees: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1(2), 169–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00658.xClatworthyM. A.PeelM. J.2006The effect of corporate status on external audit fees: Evidence from the UK1216920110.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00658.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 297–322. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00403-3 doi: 10.1111/ijau.12149CraswellA. T.FrancisJ. R.TaylorS. L.1995Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations2029732210.1016/0165-4101(95)00403-310.1111/ijau.12149Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 3, 183–199.DeAngeloL. E.1981Auditor size and audit quality318319910.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1Search in Google Scholar
DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1247–1274. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00088DeFondM. L.RaghunandanK.SubramanyamK. R.2002Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions401247127410.1111/1475-679X.00088Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dekeyser, S, Gaeremynck, A., & Willekens, M. (2019). Evidence of Industry Scale effects on audit hours, billing rates, and pricing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(2) (Summer 2019), 666–693. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12460DekeyserS.GaeremynckA.WillekensM.2019Evidence of Industry Scale effects on audit hours, billing rates, and pricing362Summer201966669310.1111/1911-3846.12460Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Demirkan, S., & Zhou, N. (2016). Audit pricing for strategic alliances: An incomplete contract perspective. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4) (Winter 2016), 1625–1647. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12213DemirkanS.ZhouN.2016Audit pricing for strategic alliances: An incomplete contract perspective334Winter20161625164710.1111/1911-3846.12213Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Depoers, F. (2000). A cost benefit study of voluntary disclosure: Some empirical evidence from French listed companies. European Accounting Review, 9(2), 245–263. doi: 10.1080/09638180050129891DepoersF.2000A cost benefit study of voluntary disclosure: Some empirical evidence from French listed companies9224526310.1080/09638180050129891Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, I. (1995). Stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992DonaldsonT.PrestonI.1995Stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, implications20659110.5465/amr.1995.9503271992Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
El-Gammal, W. (2012). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from Lebanon. International Business Research, 5(11), 136–145. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v5n11p136El-GammalW.2012Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from Lebanon51113614510.5539/ibr.v5n11p136Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ellis, Y., & Booker, Q. L. (2011). Audit fee determinants in the nonprofit sector: A study of community action agencies. Faculty Publications, Columbia State University. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.647.296&rep=rep1&type=pdfEllisY.BookerQ. L.2011Faculty Publications, Columbia State Universityhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.647.296&rep=rep1&type=pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Francis, J. R., & Simon, D. T. (1987). A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the US audit market. Accounting Review, 62(1), 145–157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/248051FrancisJ. R.SimonD. T.1987A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the US audit market621145157http://www.jstor.org/stable/248051Search in Google Scholar
Francis, J. R., & Stokes, D. J. (1986). Audit prices, product differentiation, and scale economies: Further evidence from the Australian market. Journal of Accounting Research, 24, 383–393. doi: 10.2307/2491141FrancisJ. R.StokesD. J.1986Audit prices, product differentiation, and scale economies: Further evidence from the Australian market2438339310.2307/2491141Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Freeman, E., Wicks, A., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0067FreemanE.WicksA.ParmarB.2004Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”15336436910.1287/orsc.1040.0067Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Press.FreemanR.1984Boston, MAPitman PressSearch in Google Scholar
Galani, D., Alexandridis, A., & Stavropoulos, A. (2011). The association between the firm characteristics and corporate mandatory disclosure: The case of Greece. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 77, 101–107. https://waset.org/publications/10904/the-association-between-the-firm-characteristics-and-corporate-mandatory-disclosure-the-case-of-greeceGalaniD.AlexandridisA.StavropoulosA.2011The association between the firm characteristics and corporate mandatory disclosure: The case of Greece77101107https://waset.org/publications/10904/the-association-between-the-firm-characteristics-and-corporate-mandatory-disclosure-the-case-of-greeceSearch in Google Scholar
Glaum, M., & Street, D. L. (2003). Compliance with the disclosure requirements of Germany's new market: IAS versus US GAAP. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 14, 64–100. doi: 10.1111/1467-646X.00090GlaumM.StreetD. L.2003Compliance with the disclosure requirements of Germany's new market: IAS versus US GAAP146410010.1111/1467-646X.00090Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gonthier, B. N., & Schatt, A. (2007). Determinants of audit fees for French quoted firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 139–160. doi: 10.1108/02686900710718654GonthierB. N.SchattA.2007Determinants of audit fees for French quoted firms22213916010.1108/02686900710718654Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Habib, A., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., & Rahman, A. (2019). “Problem” directors and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 23, 125–143. doi: 10.1111.ijau.12150HabibA.BhuiyanM. B. U.RahmanA.2019“Problem” directors and audit fees2312514310.1111.ijau.12150Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00112HaniffaR. M.CookeT. E.2002Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations38331734910.1111/1467-6281.00112Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hassan, Y. M., & Naser, K. (2013). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Business Research, 6(8), 13–25. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v6n8p13HassanY. M.NaserK.2013Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from an emerging economy68132510.5539/ibr.v6n8p13Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191. doi: 10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GXHayD. C.KnechelW. R.WongN.2006Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes23114119110.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GXOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hay, D., Knechel, W., & Ling, H. (2008). Evidence on the impact of internal control and corporate governance on audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 12(1), 9–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00367.xHayD.KnechelW.LingH.2008Evidence on the impact of internal control and corporate governance on audit fees12192410.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00367.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huang, H. W., Liu, L. L., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2007). Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit fees: Further evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 147–158.HuangH. W.LiuL. L.RaghunandanK.RamaD. V.2007Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit fees: Further evidence26114715810.2308/aud.2007.26.1.147Search in Google Scholar
Inchausti, A. G. (1997). The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. European Accounting Review, 6(1), 45–68. doi: 10.1080/096381897336863InchaustiA. G.1997The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms61456810.1080/096381897336863Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-XJensenM. C.MecklingW. H.1976Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure3430536010.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924JonesT.1995Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics2040443710.5465/amr.1995.9507312924Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jones, T., & Wicks, A. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/plugin-file.php/4127600/mod_resource/content/1/2.%20Jones%2C%20T.%20M.%2C%20Wicks%2C%20A.%20C.%201999..pdfJonesT.WicksA.1999Convergent stakeholder theory242206221https://edisciplinas.usp.br/plugin-file.php/4127600/mod_resource/content/1/2.%20Jones%2C%20T.%20M.%2C%20Wicks%2C%20A.%20C.%201999..pdf10.5465/amr.1999.1893929Search in Google Scholar
Joshi, P. L., & Al-Bastaki, H. (2000). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from the companies listed in Bahrain. International Journal of Auditing, 4(2), 129–138. doi: 10.1111/1099-1123.00308JoshiP. L.Al-BastakiH.2000Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from the companies listed in Bahrain4212913810.1111/1099-1123.00308Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Knapp, M. C. (1991). Factors that audit committee members use as surrogate for audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10(1), 35–52.KnappM. C.1991Factors that audit committee members use as surrogate for audit quality1013552Search in Google Scholar
Langendijk, H. (1997). The market for audit services in the Netherlands. European Accounting Review, 6(2), 253–264. doi: 10.1080/713764721LangendijkH.1997The market for audit services in the Netherlands6225326410.1080/713764721Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu, S. H. (2017). An empirical study: Auditors’ characteristics and audit fee. Open Journal of Accounting, 6, 52–70. doi: 10.4236/ojacct.2017.62005LiuS. H.2017An empirical study: Auditors’ characteristics and audit fee6527010.4236/ojacct.2017.62005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McMeeking, K. P., Peasnell, K. V., & Pope, P. F. (2006). The determinants of the UK Big Firm premium. Accounting and Business Research, 36(3), 207–231. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730022McMeekingK. P.PeasnellK. V.PopeP. F.2006The determinants of the UK Big Firm premium36320723110.1080/00014788.2006.9730022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nam, H.-J. (2018). The impact of mandatory IFRS transition on audit effort and audit fees: Evidence from Korea. Australian Accounting Review, 87(28, Issue 4), 512–524. doi: 10.1111/auar.12209NamH.-J.2018The impact of mandatory IFRS transition on audit effort and audit fees: Evidence from Korea87(8, Issue 4),51252410.1111/auar.12209Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Naser, K., Al, H. A., Al-Kwari, D., & Nuseibeh, R. (2006). Determinants of corporate social disclosure in developing countries: The case of Qatar. Advances in International Accounting, 19, 1–23. doi: 10.13189/ujaf.2014.020402NaserK.AlH. A.Al-KwariD.NuseibehR.2006Determinants of corporate social disclosure in developing countries: The case of Qatar1912310.13189/ujaf.2014.020402Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Okolie, A. O. (2014). Auditor tenure, auditor independence and accrual – based earnings management of quoted companies in Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance Research, 2(2), 63–90. http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Auditor-Tenure-Auditor-Independence-and-Accrual-%E2%80%93-Based-Earnings-Management-of-Quoted-Companies-in-Nigeria.pdfOkolieA. O.2014Auditor tenure, auditor independence and accrual – based earnings management of quoted companies in Nigeria226390http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Auditor-Tenure-Auditor-Independence-and-Accrual-%E2%80%93-Based-Earnings-Management-of-Quoted-Companies-in-Nigeria.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Peel, M. J., & Clatworthy, M. A. (2001). The relationship between governance structure and audit fees pre-Cadbury: Some empirical findings. Corporate Governance. An International Review, 9(4), 286–297. doi: 10.1111/1467-8683.00256PeelM. J.ClatworthyM. A.2001The relationship between governance structure and audit fees pre-Cadbury: Some empirical findings9428629710.1111/1467-8683.00256Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Prencipe, A. (2004). Proprietary costs and determinants of voluntary segment disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. European Accounting Review, 13(2), 319–340. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000204742PrencipeA.2004Proprietary costs and determinants of voluntary segment disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies13231934010.1080/0963818042000204742Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rouf, A. (2011). Corporate characteristics, governance attributes and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Bangladesh. African Journal of Business Management, 5(19), 7836–7845. doi: 10.5897/AJBM10.1180RoufA.2011Corporate characteristics, governance attributes and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Bangladesh5197836784510.5897/AJBM10.1180Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rowell, D., & Connelly, L. (2012). A history of the term “Moral Hazard”. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(4), 1051–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01448.xRowellD.ConnellyL.2012A history of the term “Moral Hazard”7941051107510.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01448.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sandra, W., & Patrick, P. (1996). The determinants of audit fees in Hong Kong: An empirical study. Asian Review of Accounting, 4(2), 32–50. doi: 10.1108/eb060673SandraW.PatrickP.1996The determinants of audit fees in Hong Kong: An empirical study42325010.1108/eb060673Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 161–190. doi: 10.2307/2490397SimunicD. A.1980The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence1816119010.2307/2490397Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2d89/1415c5f4faa5d1adf-4492c01fc596231353e.pdfSpenceM.1973Job market signaling873355374https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2d89/1415c5f4faa5d1adf-4492c01fc596231353e.pdf10.2307/1882010Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, M., & Simon, T. (1999). Determinants of audit fees: The importance of litigation, disclosure, and regulatory burdens in audit engagements in 20 countries. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(3), 375–388. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7063(99)00017-5TaylorM.SimonT.1999Determinants of audit fees: The importance of litigation, disclosure, and regulatory burdens in audit engagements in 20 countries34337538810.1016/S0020-7063(99)00017-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tee, C. M., Gul, F. A., Foo, Y.-B., & Teh, C. G. (2017). Institutional monitoring, political connections and audit fees: Evidence from Malaysian firms. International Journal of Auditing, 21, 164–176. doi: 10.1111/ijau.12086TeeC. M.GulF. A.FooY.-B.TehC. G.2017Institutional monitoring, political connections and audit fees: Evidence from Malaysian firms2116417610.1111/ijau.12086Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thinggaard, F., & Kiertzner, L. (2008). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from a small capital market with a joint audit requirement. International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), 141–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00377.xThinggaardF.KiertznerL.2008Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from a small capital market with a joint audit requirement12214115810.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00377.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., Reheul, A. M., & Van Caneghem, T. (2011). Audit pricing in a reformed nonprofit market. HUB Research Papers, 29. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=a5L0XtQAAAA-J&hl=enVerbruggenS.ChristiaensJ.ReheulA. M.Van CaneghemT.2011HUB Research Papers, 29. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=a5L0XtQAAAA-J&hl=enSearch in Google Scholar
Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., Reheul, A.-M., & Van Caneghem, T. (2015). Analysis of audit fees for nonprofits: Resource dependence and agency theory approaches. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(4), 734–754. doi: 10.1177/0899764014551279VerbruggenS.ChristiaensJ.ReheulA.-M.Van CaneghemT.2015Analysis of audit fees for nonprofits: Resource dependence and agency theory approaches44473475410.1177/0899764014551279Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wallace, R., & Naser, K. (1996). Firm-specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 14(4), 311–368. doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(95)00042-9WallaceR.NaserK.1996Firm-specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong14431136810.1016/0278-4254(95)00042-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, K., Sewon, O., Iqbal, Z., & Smith, L. M. (2011). Auditor market share and industry specialization of non-big 4 firms. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 11(2), 107–127. http://www.jgbm.org/page/1%20Sewon%20O.pdfWangK.SewonO.IqbalZ.SmithL. M.2011Auditor market share and industry specialization of non-big 4 firms112107127http://www.jgbm.org/page/1%20Sewon%20O.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Watts, R., & Zimmermann, J. (1978). The demand for and supply of accounting theories: The market for excuses. The Accounting Review, 54(2), 273–306. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/3829960/mod_resource/content/0/Watts_Zimmerman_1979.pdfWattsR.ZimmermannJ.1978The demand for and supply of accounting theories: The market for excuses542273306https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/3829960/mod_resource/content/0/Watts_Zimmerman_1979.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Watts, R., & Zimmermann, J. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.WattsR.ZimmermannJ.1986Englewood Cliff, NJPrentice HallSearch in Google Scholar