INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 18 apr 2020
Pagine: 151 - 163
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2019-0011
Parole chiave
© 2019 Kinga Kita-Wojciechowska et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Summary statistics of the dataset—before and after cleansing_
20,000 | 19,871 | |
11,349 | 11,209 | |
571 | 570 | |
5,03% | 5,09% |
Statistics for seven newly created variables—original granularity, inter-rater reliability of 4 selected annotators on the common set of 500 observations and significance in our risk model after applying necessary simplifications_
Neighbourhood type | Seven types, multi-choice | 0.52 | Moderate agreement | 2 | 00.01 |
Building density | Scale 1–5 | 0.50 | Moderate agreement | Not significant | |
Street View quality | Good/bad/missing | 0.79 | Substantial agreement | 2 | 00.02 |
House type | Five types, single-choice | 0.69 | Substantial agreement | 2 | 00.01 |
House age | Scale 1–3 | 0.51 | Moderate agreement | 2 | 00.03 |
House condition | Scale 1–3 | 0.54 | Moderate agreement | 2 | 00.04 |
Wealth of residents | Scale 1–10 | 0.32 | Fair agreement | Not significant |
Data for calculation of X2 statistic for hypothesis verification whether claims in our dataset follow the Poisson distribution_ On average λ = 3_9% and the corresponding X2 = 0_08 with 1 degree of freedom_
( | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 10,784 | 96% | 10,785 | 0,00 |
1 | 417 | 4% | 416 | 0,01 |
2 | 7 | 0% | 8 | 0,08 |
All | 11,209 |