Didactic Capacity of Selected Czech and Russian Organic Chemistry Textbooks

[1] Baek E-O, Monaghan J. Journey to textbook affordability: An investigation of students’ use of a Textbooks at multiple campuses. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2013;14:1-26. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1237.10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1237Search in Google Scholar

[2] Gurung RAR, Martin CR. Predicting textbook reading. Teach Psychology. 2011;38:22-8. DOI: 10.1177/0098628310390913.10.1177/0098628310390913Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kim JHY, Jung HY. South Korean digital textbook project. Computers in the Schools. 2010;27:247-65. DOI: 10.1080/07380569.2010.523887.10.1080/07380569.2010.523887Search in Google Scholar

[4] Sunarko V, Haro N, Sitorus IT, Sitorus P A, Saragih E. A content analysis of “Joyful” English textbook for Primary Grade II. JEE. 2019;4:77-88. DOI: 10.31327/jee.v4i2.1107.10.31327/jee.v4i2.1107Search in Google Scholar

[5] Abd-El-Khalick F, Myers JY, Summers R, Brunner J, Waight N, Wahbeh N, et al. A longitudinal analysis of the extent and manner of representations of nature of science in U.S. high school biology and physics textbooks. J Res Sci Teach. 2017;54:82-120. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21339.10.1002/tea.21339Search in Google Scholar

[6] Birema A-M, Schwartz RS, Gill SA. To what extent does current scientific research and textbooks content align? A methodology and case study. J Res Sci Teaching. 2017; 54:1097-118. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21399.10.1002/tea.21399Search in Google Scholar

[7] Průcha J. Učebnice: Teorie analýzy edukačního media (Textbooks: Theory of educational media analysis). Brno: Paido; 1998. ISBN: 8085931494.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Devetak I, Vogrinc J. The Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of the Science Textbooks. Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013. ISBN: 9789400741676.10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3_1Search in Google Scholar

[9] Vesterinen V-M, Aksela M, Lavonen J. Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Sci Educ. 2013; 22:1839-55. DOI: 10.1007/s11191-011-9400-1.10.1007/s11191-011-9400-1Search in Google Scholar

[10] Janoušková E. Vztah úrovně didaktické vybavenosti a míry obtížnosti textu současných učebnic (Relationship between the level of didactic capacity and the degree of text difficulty of contemporary textbooks). Praha: Pedagogical orientation. 2009;19:56-72.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Maňák J, Knecht P. Hodnocení učebnic (Evaluation of texbooks). Brno: Paido; 2007. ISBN: 9788073151485.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Zierer K. Didactics textbooks in Germany and the USA: A study of eclecticism, selection and integration. Res Comparative Internat Educ. 2011;62:147-60. DOI: 10.2304/rcie.2011.6.2.147.10.2304/rcie.2011.6.2.147Search in Google Scholar

[13] Friesen N. The past and likely future of an educational form: A textbook case. Educational Res. 2013;42:498-508. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X13513535.10.3102/0013189X13513535Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ibragimov ID, Dusenko SV, Khairulina ER, Tikhonova NV, Yevgrafova OG. Recommendations on the textbooks creation as information and teaching tools of education management. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11:33-446. Available from: https://www.iejme.com/article/recommendations-on-the-textbooks-creation-as-information-and-teaching-tools-of-education-management.10.29333/iejme/343Search in Google Scholar

[15] Berry T, Cook L, Hill N, Stevens K. An exploratory analysis of textbook usage and study habits: Misperceptions and barriers to success. College Teach. 2010;59:31-9. DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2010.509376.10.1080/87567555.2010.509376Search in Google Scholar

[16] Foster S. Dominant traditions in international textbook research and revision. Education Inquiry. 2016;2:5-20. DOI: 10.3402/edui.v2i1.21959.10.3402/edui.v2i1.21959Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mohd SH. EFL Textbook analysis: A case study. Language and Literacy. 2012;14:27-45. DOI: 10.20360/G2HP4J.10.20360/G2HP4JSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Cvetkov LA. Organicheskaya khimiya: uchebnik dlya uchashchikhsya 10-11 klassov (Organic chemistry: textbook for students in grades 10-11). Moscow: Gumanitarnyj izdatelskij tsentr Vlados; 2013. ISBN: 9785691003660.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Gabrielyan OO. Khimiya: 10 klass, 18-e (Chemistry: Grade 10, 18th). Moscow: Drofa; 2011. ISBN: 978535814007-3.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kolář K, Kodíček M. Chemie II. pro gymnázia - organická chemie a biochemie (Chemistry II. For grammar schools - organic chemistry and biochemistry). Praha: SPN - Pedagogical publisher; 2005. ISBN: 8072352830.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Rudzitis GE, Feldman FG. Khimiya: Organicheskaya khimiya 10 klass (Chemistry: Organic Chemistry Grade 10). Moscow: Prosveschenije; 2012. ISBN: 9785090265164.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Viehhauser M. Das Schulwesen aber ist und bleibt allezeit ein politikum (But the school system is and always will be a political issue): The Felbiger General School Ordinance and School Reform in the Eighteenth-Century Habsburg Monarchy. Westberg J, Boser L, Brühwiler I, editors. School Acts and the Rise of Mass Schooling. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. ISBN: 9783030135690.10.1007/978-3-030-13570-6_2Search in Google Scholar

[23] Macleod M, Sumillera RG, Surman J, Smirnova E. Language as a Scientific Tool: Shaping Scientific Language Across Time and National Tradition. New York: Routledge, Taylor Francis Group; 2016. ISBN: 9781138101050.10.4324/9781315657257Search in Google Scholar

[24] Quadrát BB. Základové chemie: K užívání na nižších reálkách (Basic chemistry: For the use in lower secondary schools). Brno: Tiskem Karla Winikera; 1862.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Jahn Z, Procházka P. Chemie organická čili chemie sloučenin uhlíkových (Organic chemistry or chemistry of carbon compounds). Praha; 1878.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Červený A. Základové lučby hospodářské (Basics of homestead chemistry). Praha; 1868.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Smetana FJ. Počátkové silozpytu čili fysiky pro nižší gymnasia a reálky (Beginning of “silozpyt” or physics for lower gymnasiums and secondary schools). Praha: J. G. Calve. 1852.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Huvarová M. Nejpoužívanější středoškolské učebnice chemie na gymnáziích (The most used high school chemistry textbooks at grammar schools). Olomouc: Palacký University Olomouc; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Vacík J. Přehled středoškolské chemie (Overview of high school chemistry). Praha: SPN - Pedagogical publisher; 1999. ISBN: 9788085937084.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Čtrnáctová H. Učební úlohy v chemii (Learning tasks in chemistry). Praha: Karolinum; 2009. ISBN: 8071847070.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Teleshov VS. Osnaščenije kabinětov khimii v Rossijskoj Imperii XIX - načale XX vv (Equipping classrooms of chemistry in the Russian Empire in XIX - early XX centuries). St. Petersburg: Gamtamokslinis ugdymas bendrojo ugdymo mokykloje. 2017;23:125-36.10.48127/gu/17.23.125Search in Google Scholar

[32] Karásková N, Kolář K. Vadim Nikandrovich Verkhovskij i jego wkład na rzecz edukacji chemicznej (Vadim Nikandrovich Verkhovskij and his contribution to chemical education). In: Co w dydaktykach nauk przyrodniczych ocalić od zapomnienia? (What to save in natural science didactics from forgetting?) Kraków: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie; 2015. ISBN: 9788372719676.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Klečka M. Teorie a praxe tvorby učebnic chemie pro střední školy (Theory and practice of creating chemistry textbooks for secondary schools). Praha: Charles University; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Mareček A, Honza J. Chemie pro čtyřletá gymnázia - 3 díl (Chemistry for four-year grammar schools -3^rd volume). Olomouc: Olomouc Publisher; 2000. ISBN: 9788090240261.Search in Google Scholar