[
Aizerman, M. A. and Malishevski, A. V. (1981) General theory of best variants choice. Some aspects. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-26, 1030-1040.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felsenthal, D. S. and Nurmi H. (2017) Monotonicity Failures Afficting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felsenthal, D. S. and Nurmi, H. (2018) Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felsenthal, D. S. and Nurmi H. (2019) Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fishburn, P. C. (1974) Paradoxes of voting. American Political Review 68, 537-546.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fishburn, P. C. (1977) Condorcet social choice functions. Journal of Applied Mathematics 33, 469-489.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fishburn, P. C. (1982) Monotonicity paradoxes in the theory of elections. Discrete Applied Mathematics 4, 119-134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fishburn, P. C. and Brams, S. J. (1983) Paradoxes of preferential voting. Mathematics Magazine 56, 207-214.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gazeta Wyborcza, http://wyborcza.pl/7,113768,20925157,konkurs-wieniawskiego-2016-wewnetrzna-wojna-jurorow.htmldisableRedirects=true November 29, 2018 (Wieniawski competition, war of jurors) (in Polish).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbard, A. (1974) A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim. Journal of Economic Theory 7 388-410.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Januszkiewicz, M. and Chorościak, E. (2016) Konkurs skrzypcowy im. Wieniawskiego w Poznaniu (Wieniawski Violin Competition in Poznań). Ruch Muzyczny. 50-55 (in Polish).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kontek, K. and Sosnowska, H. (2020) Specific Tastes or Cliques of Jurors? How to Reduce the Level of Manipulation in Group Decisions? Group Decision and Negotiation, 29, 1057-1084.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Louis, P., Nunez, M. and Xefteris, D. (2023) Trimming extreme reports in preference aggregation. Games and Economic Behavior 137, 116-151.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moulin, H. (1988) Condorcet’s principle implies the No-Show paradox. Journal of Economic Theory 45, 533-64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nurmi, H. (1987) Comparing Voting Systems. Reidel, Dordrecht.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nurmi, H. (2004) A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments. Theory and Decision 57, 5-24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramsza, M. and Sosnowska, H. (2020) Trials of characterizations of anti-manipulation method. Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXXV, 21-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saari, D. G. and Barney, S. (2003) Consequences of reversing preferences. Mathematical Intelligencer 25, 17-31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Satherwaitte, M. A. (1975) Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s condition: existence and correspondence for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10, 187-217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sen, A. K. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sosnowska, H. and Zawiślak, P. (2019) Differences of voting of jurors in classical music competitions. Analysis using MCDM and network theory. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 14, 100-114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woodall, D. R. (1994) Properties of preferential election rules. Voting Matters 3, 8-15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, H. P. (1974) An axiomatization of Borda’s rule. Journal of Economic Theory 9. 43-52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, H. P. (1975) Social choice scoring functions. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 28, 824-838.
]Search in Google Scholar
