[
1. Qasaimeh, M., R. S. Al-Qassas, S. Aljawarneh. Recent Development in Smart Grid Authentication Approaches: A Systematic Literature Review. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 19, 2019, No 1, pp. 27-52.10.2478/cait-2019-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Dabrowski, C. Reliability in Grid Computing Systems. – Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Vol. 21, 2009, No 8, pp. 927-959.10.1002/cpe.1410
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Sadashiv, N., S. D. Kumar. Cluster, Grid and Cloud Computing: A Detailed Comparison. – In: Proc. of 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE’11), IEEE, August 2011, pp. 477-482.10.1109/ICCSE.2011.6028683
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Casanova, H. Distributed Computing Research Issues in Grid Computing. – ACM SIGAct News, Vol. 33, 2002, No 3, pp. 50-70.10.1145/582475.582486
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Yu, J., R. Buyya, K. Ramamohanarao. Workflow Scheduling Algorithms for Grid Computing. – In: Proc. of Metaheuristics for Scheduling in Distributed Computing Environments, 2008, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 173-214.10.1007/978-3-540-69277-5_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Maji, P. K., R. Biswas, A. R. Roy. Soft Set Theory. – Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 45, 2003, No 4-5, pp. 555-562.10.1016/S0898-1221(03)00016-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Hayat, K., M. I. Ali, B. Y. Cao, X. P. Yang. A New Type-2 Soft Set: Type-2 Soft Graphs and Their Applications. – Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2017.10.1155/2017/6162753
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Gu, S., T. Lillicrap, I. Sutskever, S. Levine. Continuous Deep q-Learning with Model-Based Acceleration. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, June 2016, pp. 2829-2838.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Jeaunita, T. J., V. Sarasvathi. A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning-Based Optimized Routing for QoS in IoT. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 21, 2021, No 4, pp. 45-61.10.2478/cait-2021-0042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Eng, K., A. Muhammed, M. A. Mohamed, S. Hasan. A Hybrid Heuristic of Variable Neighbourhood Descent and Great Deluge Algorithm for Efficient Task Scheduling in Grid Computing. – European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 284, 2020, No 1, pp. 75-86.10.1016/j.ejor.2019.12.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Bhatia, M. K. Task Scheduling in Grid Computing: A Review. – Advances in Computational Sciences and Technology, Vol. 10, 2017 No 6, pp. 1707-1714.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Casagrande, L. C., G. P. Koslovski, C. C. Miers, M. A. Pillon. DeepScheduling: Grid Computing Job Scheduler Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, April 2020, Springer Cham, pp. 1032-1044.10.1007/978-3-030-44041-1_89
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Eng, K., A. Muhammed, M. A. Mohamed, S. Hasan. A Hybrid Heuristic of Variable Neighbourhood Descent and Great Deluge Algorithm for Efficient Task Scheduling in Grid Computing. – European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 284, 2020, No 1, pp. 75-86.10.1016/j.ejor.2019.12.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Umar, R., A. Pujiyanta. Development of First Come First Serve-Ejecting Based Dynamic Scheduling (FCFS-EDS) Simulation Scheduling Method for MPI Job in a Grid System. – Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 12, 2017, No 8, pp. 1972-1978.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Tang, K., W. Jiang, R. Cui, Y. Wu. A Memory-Based Task Scheduling Algorithm for Grid Computing Based on Heterogeneous Platform and Homogeneous Tasks. – International Journal of Web and Grid Services, Vol. 16, 2020, No 3, pp. 287-304.10.1504/IJWGS.2020.109473
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Zeigler, B. P., A. Muzy, E. Kofman. Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Discrete Event & Iterative System Computational Foundations. Academic Press, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Zhang, J., G. Ding, Y. Zou, S. Qin, J. Fu. Review of Job Shop Scheduling Research and Its New Perspectives under Industry 4.0. – Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 30, 2019, No 4, pp. 1809-1830.10.1007/s10845-017-1350-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Nie, R., S. He, F. Liu, X. Luan, H. Shen. Hmm-Based Asynchronous Controller Design of Markovian Jumping Lur’e Systems within a Finite-Time Interval. – IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2020.10.1109/TSMC.2020.2964643
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Bhattacharya, S., S. Badyal, T. Wheeler, S. Gil, D. Bertsekas. Reinforcement Learning for POMDP: Partitioned Rollout and Policy Iteration with Application to Autonomous Sequential Repair Problems. – IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Vol. 5, 2020, No 3, pp. 3967-3974.10.1109/LRA.2020.2978451
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Heath, A., N. Kunst, C. Jackson, M. Strong, F. Alarid-Escudero, J. D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, H. Jalal. Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from 3 Case Studies. – Medical Decision Making, Vol. 40, 2020, No 3, pp. 314-326.10.1177/0272989X20912402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Hironaka, T., M. B. Giles, T. Goda, H. Thom. Multilevel Monte Carlo Estimation of the Expected Value of Sample Information. – SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, Vol. 8, 2020, No 3, pp. 1236-1259.10.1137/19M1284981
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Klusacek, D., M. Soysal, F. Suter. Alea-Complex Job Scheduling Simulator. – In: 13th International Conference on Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, September 2019.10.1007/978-3-030-43222-5_19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Kada, B., H. Kalla. An Efficient Fault-Tolerant Scheduling Approach with Energy Minimization for Hard Real-Time Embedded Systems. – In: Proc. of International Workshop on Distributed Computing for Emerging Smart Networks, October 2019, Springer Cham., pp. 102-117.10.1007/978-3-030-40131-3_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Toshev, A. Particle Swarm Optimization and Tabu Search Hybrid Algorithm for Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem-Analysis of Test Results. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 19, 2019, No 4, pp. 26-44.10.2478/cait-2019-0034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Ivanova-Rohling, V. N., N. Rohling. Evaluating Machine Learning Approaches for Discovering Optimal Sets of Projection Operators for Quantum State Tomography of Qubit Systems. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 20, 2020, No 6, pp. 61-73.10.2478/cait-2020-0061
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Eleliemy, A., A. Mohammed, F. M. Ciorba. Exploring the Relation between Two Levels of Scheduling Using a Novel Simulation Approach. – In: Proc. of 16th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing (ISPDC’17), 2017, pp. 26-33.10.1109/ISPDC.2017.23
]Search in Google Scholar
