[1. Boyadzhieva, D., G. Gluhchev. A Combined Method for On-Line Signature Verification. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 14, 2014, No 2, pp. 92-97.10.2478/cait-2014-0022]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Dafe, S. G., S. S. Chavhan. Optical Character Recognition Using Image Processing. – IRJET, Vol. 5, 2018, Isue 3, pp. 962-964.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Kaur, S. Gurmukhi Printed Character Recognition Using Hierarchical Centroid Method and SVM. – International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 149, 2016, No 3, pp. 24-27.10.5120/ijca2016911367]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Sharma, A., S. Khare, S. Chavan. A Review on Handwritten Character Recognition. – IJCST, Vol. 8491, 2017, Issue 1, pp. 71-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Fakhr, M. W. Arabic Optical Character Recognition (OCR). – Systems Overview, Vol. 2011, January 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Rubeena, L. R. B. A Comprehensive Study on Handwritten Character Recognition System. – IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering Ver. IV, Vol. 17, 2015, No 2, pp. 2278-661.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Yadav, P. Handwriting Recognition System – A Review. – International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 114, 2015, No 19, pp. 36-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Goldberg, L. R., D. Sweeney, P. F. Merenda, J. E. Hughes. Demographic Variables and Personality: The Effects of Gender, Age, Education, and Ethnic/racial Status on Self-Descriptions of Personality Attributes. – Person. Individ. Diff., Vol. 24, 1998, No 3, pp. 393-403.10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00110-4]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Liwicki, M., A. Schlapbach, P. Loretan, H. Bunke. Automatic Detection of Gender and Handedness from On-Line Handwriting. – Journal of Social Psychology, 2007, No March, pp. 179-183.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Liwicki, M., A. Schlapbach, H. Bunke. Automatic Gender Detection Using On-Line and Off-Line Information. – Pattern Analysis and Applications, Vol. 14, 2011, No 1, pp. 87-92.10.1007/s10044-010-0178-6]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Xie, Q., Q. Xu. Gender Prediction from Handwriting. – Data Mining Course Project. – Fall 2013. 2013, pp. 10-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Ahmed, M., A. Ghulam, H. Afzal, I. Siddiqi. Improving handwriting Based Gender Classification Using Ensemble Classifiers. – Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 85, 2017, pp. 158-168.10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.033]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Marti, U. V., H. Bunke. The IAM-Database: An English Sentence Database for Off-line Handwriting Recognition. – International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Vol. 5, 2003, No 1, pp. 39-46.10.1007/s100320200071]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Sokic, E., A. Salihbegovic, M. Ahic-Djokic. Analysis of Off-Line Handwritten Text Samples of Different Gender Using Shape Descriptors. – In: IX International Symposium on Telecommunications (BIHTEL), 2012, pp. 1-6.10.1109/BIHTEL.2012.6412086]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Al Maadeed, S., W. Ayouby, A. Hassaïn e, J. Mohamad Aljaam. QUWI: An Arabic and English Handwriting Dataset for Offline Writer Identification. – In: IIEEE International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition QUWI, Vol. 95, 2012, No 15, pp. 742-747.10.1109/ICFHR.2012.256]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Hassaïne, A., S. Al Maadeed, J. Aljaam, A. Jaoua. ICDAR2013 – Competition on Gender Prediction from Handwriting. 2013.10.1109/ICDAR.2013.286]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Al Maadeed, S., A. Hassaine. Automatic Prediction of Age, Gender, and Nationality in Off-line Handwriting. – Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2014, pp. 1-10.10.1186/1687-5281-2014-10]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Siddiqi, I., C. Djeddi, A. Raza. Automatic Analysis of Handwriting for Gender Classification. – Pattern Analysis and Applications, Vol. 18, 2015, No 4, pp. 887-899.10.1007/s10044-014-0371-0]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Djeddi, C., A. Gattal, L. Souici-Meslati, I. Siddiqi, Y. Chibani, H. El Abed. LAMIS-MSHD: A Multi-Script Offline Handwriting Database. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR’14), Vol. 2014, December 2014, pp. 93-97.10.1109/ICFHR.2014.23]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Bouadjenek, N., H. Nemmour, Y. Chibani. HOG and LBP Features for Writer’s Gender Classification. – International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Control Applications, 2016, pp. 317-325.10.1007/978-3-319-48929-2_24]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Bouadjenek, N. H. N., Y. C. Age. Gender and Handedness Prediction from Handwriting Using Gradient Features. – Complexity, 2015, pp. 1116-1120.10.1109/ICDAR.2015.7333934]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Mahmoud, S. A., I. Ahmad, M. Alshayeb, W. G. Al-Khatib, T. U. Braunschweig, S. A. Mahmoud, I. Ahmad, M. Alshayeb, W. G. Al-Khatib, M. T. Parvez, G. A. Fink, V. Margner, H. E. Abed. KHATT: Arabic Off-line Handwritten Text Database. – In: International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR’12), 2012, pp. 449-454.10.1109/ICFHR.2012.224]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Mahmoud, S. A., I. Ahmad, W. G. Al-Khatib, M. Alshayeb, M. Tanvir Parvez, V. Märgner, G. A. Fink. KHATT: An Open Arabic Off-line Handwritten Text Database. – Pattern Recognition, Vol. 47, 2014, No 3, pp. 1096-1112.10.1016/j.patcog.2013.08.009]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Mirza, A., M. Moetesum, I. Siddiqi, C. Djeddi. Gender Classification from Off-line Handwriting Images Using Textural Features. – In: Proc. of International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, ICFHR, 2017, pp. 395-398.10.1109/ICFHR.2016.0080]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Gattal, A., C. Djeddi, I. Siddiqi, Y. Chibani. Gender Classification from Offline Multi-Script Handwriting Images Using Oriented Basic Image Features (oBIFs). – Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 99, 2018, No February, pp. 155-167.10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.038]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Grewal, P. K., D. Prashar. Behavior Prediction through Handwriting Analysis. – InternatIonal Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Vol. 3, 2012, No 2, pp. 520-523.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Rizvi, F. Personality Prediction through Offline Handwriting Analysis. 2017, No February.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Tett, R. P., C. A. Palmer. The Validity of Handwriting Elements in Relation to Self-Report Personality Trait Measures. – Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 22, 1997, No 1, pp. 11-18.10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00183-3]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Warner, R. M., D. B. Sugarman. Attributions of Personality Based on Physical Appearance, Speech, and Handwriting. Vol. 50, 1986, No 4, pp. 792-799.10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.792]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Burr, V. Judging Gender from Samples of Adult Handwriting: Accuracy and Use of Cues. – Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 142, 2002, No 6.10.1080/0022454020960392912450344]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Rubin, D. L., K. Greene. Gender-Typical Style in Written Language. – Source: Research in the Teaching of English, Vol. 26, 1992, No 1, pp. 7-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Koppel, M., S. Argamon, S. A. Rachel. Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender. – Literary and Linguistic Computing, Vol. 17, 2002, No 4, pp. 401-412.10.1093/llc/17.4.401]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Marti, U.-V., H. Bunke. A Full English Sentence Database for Off-Line Handwriting Recognition. – Icdar, Vol. 1999, pp. 705-708.10.1109/ICDAR.1999.791885]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Bangare, S. L., A. Dubal, P. S. Bangare, D. S. T. P. Reviewing Otsu’s Method for Image Thresholding. – International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 10, 2015, No August 2016, pp. 21777-21783.10.37622/IJAER/10.9.2015.21777-21783]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Jaeger, S., S. Manke, J. Reichert, A. Waibel. On-line Handwriting Recognition: The NPen ++ Recognizer. – Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recognit., March 2001, No May 2017, pp. 169-180.10.1007/PL00013559]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Al-Maadeed, S., A. Hassaine, A. Bouridane, M. A. Tahir. Novel Geometric Features for Off-Line Writer Identification. – Pattern Analysis and Applications, Vol. 19, 2016, No 3, pp. 699-708.10.1007/s10044-014-0438-y]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Koppenhaver, K. M. Forensic Document Examination: Principles and Practice. – Forgery, 2007, pp. 55-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Siddiqi, I., N. Vincent. Text Independent Writer Recognition Using Redundant Writing Patterns with Contour-Based Orientation and Curvature Features. – Pattern Recognition, Vol. 43, 2010, No 11, pp. 3853-3865.10.1016/j.patcog.2010.05.019]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Hassaïne, A., S. Al-Maadeed, A. Bouridane. A Set of Geometrical Features for Writer Identification. – Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 7667 LNCS, 2012, pp. 584-591.10.1007/978-3-642-34500-5_69]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Jiang, N. Research on Gradient Local Binary Patterns Method for Human Detection. 2013, No February.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Dalal, N., B. Triggs, N. Dalal, B. Triggs. Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection. – IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, pp. 886-893.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Yilmaz, M. B., B. Yanikoglu, C. Tirkaz, A. Kholmatov. Offline Signature Verification Using Classifier Combination of HOG and LBP Features. – In: 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics, (IJCB’2011), 2011, No October 2015.10.1109/IJCB.2011.6117473]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Déniz, O., G. Bueno, J. Salido, F. De Torre. Face Recognition Using Histograms of Oriented Gradients.pdf. Vol. 32, 2011, pp. 1598-1603.10.1016/j.patrec.2011.01.004]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Bai, L., Y. Li, M. Hui. Face Recognition Based on Wavelet Kernel Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 14, 2014, No 3, pp. 37-45.10.2478/cait-2014-0031]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Lowe, D. G. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. – International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 60, 2004, No 2, pp. 1-28.10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Ulusoy, I., C. Bishop. Comparison of Generative and Discriminative Techniques for Object Detection and Classification. – Toward Category-Level Object Recognition, 2006, pp. 173-195.10.1007/11957959_9]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Kumar, R., S. K. Srivastava. Machine Learning: A Review on Binary Classification. – International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 160, 2017, No 7, pp. 11-15.10.5120/ijca2017913083]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Strecht, P., L. Cruz, C. Soares, J. Mendes-Moreira, R. Abreu. PER-08: A Comparative Study of Classification and Regression Algorithms for Modelling Students’ Academic Performance. – Portugal, 2015, pp. 392-395.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Dong, H., G. Jian. Parameter Selection of a Support Vector Machine, Based on a Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 15, 2015, No 3, pp. 140-149.10.1515/cait-2015-0047]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Huanrui, H. New Mixed Kernel Functions of SVM Used in Pattern Recognition. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 5, pp. 5-14.10.1515/cait-2016-0047]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Schölkopf, B., K.-K. Sung, C. J. C. Burges, F. Girosi, P. Niyogi, T. Poggio. Comparing Support Vector Machines with Gaussian Kernels to Radial Basis Function Classifier. Vol. 45, 1997, No 11, pp. 2758-2765.10.1109/78.650102]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Imandoust, S. B., M. Bolandraftar. Application of k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) Approach for Predicting Economic Events: Theoretical Background. – Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 3, 2013, No 5, pp. 605-610.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Cutler, A. Random Forests for Survival, Regression, and Classification. – Utah State University. Ovronnaz, Switzerland, 2010, pp. 1-129.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Kishor, D. R., N. B. Venkateswarlu. Hybridization of Expectation-Maximization and k-Means Algorithms for Better Clustering Performance. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 2, pp. 16-34.10.1515/cait-2016-0017]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Parvez, T. M., S. A. Mahmoud. Arabic Handwriting Recognition Using Structural and Syntactic Pattern Attributes. – Pattern Recognition, Vol. 46, 2013, No 1, pp. 141-154.10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.012]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Gupta, B., P. Uttarakhand, I. A. Rawat. Analysis of Various Decision Tree Algorithms for Classification in Data Mining. – International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 163, 2017, No 8, pp. 975-987.10.5120/ijca2017913660]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Hassanat, A. B., M. A. Abbadi, A. A. Alhasanat. Solving the Problem of the k Parameter in the kNN Classifier Using an Ensemble Learning Approach. – International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), Vol. 12, 2014, No 8, pp. 33-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Guo, G., H. Wang, D. Bell, Y. Bi, K. Greer. Using kNN Model for Automatic Text Categorization. – Soft Computing, Vol. 10, 2006, No 5, pp. 423-430.10.1007/s00500-005-0503-y]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Patil, A. B., J. Shaikh. OTSU Thresholding Method for Flower Image Segmentation. 2016, pp. 1-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Al-Ma’adeed, S., D. Elliman, C. A. Higgins. A Data Base for Arabic Handwritten Text Recognition Research. – In: Proc. of International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, IWFHR, Vol. 1, 2002, No 1, pp. 485-489.]Search in Google Scholar