Group Decision Analysis Algorithms with EDAS for Interval Fuzzy Sets

1. Abdullah, L., C. Adawiyah, C. Kamal. A Decision Making Method Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: An Approach for Ambulance Location Preference. – Applied Computing and Informatics, Vol. 14, 2018, Issue 1, pp. 65-72.10.1016/j.aci.2017.04.003Search in Google Scholar

2. Chen, S.-J., Z.-Y. Wang, W.-R. Li. Calculating the Degree of Similarity between Interval-Valued Fuzzy Numbers Based on Map Distance. – In: Proc. of International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS’13), 2013, Hong Kong.Search in Google Scholar

3. Chen, S. H., C. H. Hsieh. Representation, Ranking, Distance, and Similarity of L-R Type Fuzzy Number and Application. – Australia Journal of Intelligent Information Processing Systems, Vol. 6, 2000, No 4, pp. 217-229.Search in Google Scholar

4. Chiao, K. Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Multiple Criteria Decision Making Based on Quantifier Guided Aggregation Ordered Weighted Averaging Operator. – In: Proc. of Joint 17th World Congress of International Fuzzy Systems Association and 9th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (IFSA-SCIS), 27-30 June 2017.10.1109/IFSA-SCIS.2017.8023334Search in Google Scholar

5. Ilieva, G. A Fuzzy Approach for Bidding Strategy Selection. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 12, 2012, No 1, pp. 61-69.10.2478/cait-2012-0005Search in Google Scholar

6. Ilieva, G. Group Decision Analysis with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Numbers. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 17, 2017, No 1, pp. 31-44.10.1515/cait-2017-0003Search in Google Scholar

7. Ilieva, G. TOPSIS Modification with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Numbers. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 2, pp. 60-68.10.1515/cait-2016-0020Search in Google Scholar

8. Kahraman, C., B. Oztaysi, E. Turanoglu. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. – Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 59, 2014, pp. 48-57.10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.001Search in Google Scholar

9. Ghorabaee, K. M., M. Amiri, E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis. Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using an Extended EDAS Method with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. – Economics and Management, Vol. 20, 2017, No 1, pp. 48-68.10.15240/tul/001/2017-1-004Search in Google Scholar

10. Ghorabaee, K. M., E. K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, Z. Turskis. Multicriteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). – Informatica, Vol. 26, 2015, No 3, pp. 435-451.10.15388/Informatica.2015.57Search in Google Scholar

11. Liao, H., Z. Xu. Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Hesitant Fuzzy Hybrid Weighted Aggregation Operators. – In: Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making Methodologies and Applications, Springer, 2017.10.1007/978-981-10-3265-3Search in Google Scholar

12. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Criteria Importance Depending on Membership Degrees of Fuzzy Relations. – Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 61, 2008, No 5, pp. 579-584.Search in Google Scholar

13. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Criteria Importance with Weighting Functions. – Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 61, 2008, No 3, pp. 293-300.Search in Google Scholar

14. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Ordering on Base of Multicriteria Aggregation. – Cybernetics and Systems, an International Journal, Vol. 29, 1998, No 6, Taylor and Francis Group, Robert Trappl, Ed., pp. 613-623.10.1080/019697298125542Search in Google Scholar

15. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Models for Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Fuzzy Numbers for Criteria Evaluations. – Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 62, 2009, No 10, pp. 1217-1222.Search in Google Scholar

16. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Weighting Functions for the Criteria. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 4, pp. 58-71.Search in Google Scholar

17. Popchev, I., V. Peneva. An Algorithm for Comparison of Fuzzy Sets. – Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Vol. 60, 1993, No 1, pp. 59-65.10.1016/0165-0114(93)90289-TSearch in Google Scholar

18. Radeva, I. Multicriteria Fuzzy Sets Application in Economic Clustering Problems. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 17, 2017, No 3, pp. 29-46.10.1515/cait-2017-0028Search in Google Scholar

19. Runkler, T., S. Coupland, J. Robert. Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Decision Making. – International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 80, 2017, pp. 217-224.10.1016/j.ijar.2016.09.007Search in Google Scholar

20. Sharaf, I. TOPSIS with Similarity Measure for MADM Applied to Network Selection. – Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2017, pp. 1-18.10.1007/s40314-017-0556-4Search in Google Scholar

21. Soner, O., E. Celik, E. Akyuz. Application of AHP and VIKOR Methods under Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Environment in Maritime Transportation. – Ocean Engineering, Vol. 129, 2017, pp. 107-116.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.010Search in Google Scholar

22. Wei, G. Pythagorean Fuzzy Interaction Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making. – Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 33, 2017, No 4, pp. 2119-2132.10.3233/JIFS-162030Search in Google Scholar

23. Zavadskas,E. K., F. Cavallaro, V. Podvezko, I. Ubarte, A. Kaklauskas. MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius. – Sustainability, Vol. 9, 2017, No 5. 702 p.10.3390/su9050702Search in Google Scholar

24. Zhang, H., J. Wang, X. Chen. Interval Neutrosophic Sets and Their Application in Multicriteria Decision Making Problems. – Hindawi the Scientific World Journal, Vol. 2014, Article ID 645953. 15 p.10.1155/2014/645953394779124695916Search in Google Scholar

25. Zhong, L., L. Yao. An ELECTRE I-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Method with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Numbers and its Application to Supplier Selection. – Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 57, 2017, pp. 556-576.10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.001Search in Google Scholar