INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

1. Ashby J.: Scientific issues associated with the validation of invitro and in vivo methods for assessing endocrine disrupting chemicals. Toxicology 2002, 181-182, 389-397.10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00473-0 Search in Google Scholar

2. Ashby J., Tinwell H., Odum J., Lefevre P.: Natural variability and the influence of concurrent control values on the detection and interpretation of low-dose or week endocrine toxicities. Environ Health Perspect 2004, 112, 847-853.10.1289/ehp.6862 Search in Google Scholar

3. Boettger-Tong H., Murthy L., Chiappetta C., Kirkland J.L., Goodwin B., Adlercreutz H., Stancel G.M., Makela S.: A case of a laboratory animal feed with high estrogenic activity and its impact on in vivo responses to exogenously administered estrogens. Environ Health Perspect 1998, 106, 369-373.10.1289/ehp.98106369 Search in Google Scholar

4. Bovee T.F.H., Helsdingen R.J.R., Koks P.D., Kuiper H.A., Hoogenboom R.L.A.P., Keijer J.: Development of a rapid yeast estrogen bioassay, based on the expression of green fluorescent protein. Gene 2004, 325, 187-200.10.1016/j.gene.2003.10.015 Search in Google Scholar

5. Bovee T.F.H., Bor G., Heskamp H.H., Hoogenboom R.L.A.P., Nielen M.W.F.: Validation and application of a robust yeast estrogen bioassay for the screening of estrogenic activity in animal feed. Food Addit Contam 2006, 23, 556-568.10.1080/02652030600557163 Search in Google Scholar

6. Brown N.M., Setchell K.D.R.: Animal models impacted by phytoestrogens in commercial chow: implications for pathways influenced by hormones. Lab Invest 2001, 81, 735-747.10.1038/labinvest.3780282 Search in Google Scholar

7. Casanova M., You L., Gaido K.W., Archibeque-Engle S., Janszen D.B., Heck H.d’A.: Developmental effects of dietary phytoestrogens in Sprague-Dawley rats and interactions of genistein and daidzein with rat estrogen receptors α and β invitro. Toxicol Sci 1999, 51, 236-244.10.1093/toxsci/51.2.236 Search in Google Scholar

8. Cederroth C.R, Auger J., Zimmermann C., Eustache F., Nef S.: Soy, phytooestrogens and male reproductive function: a review. Int J Androl 2010, 33, 304-316.10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01011.x Search in Google Scholar

9. Degen G.H., Janning P., Diel P., Bolt H.M.: Estrogenic isoflavones in rodent diets. Toxicol Lett 2002, 128, 145-157.10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00009-7 Search in Google Scholar

10. Diel P., Schulz T., Smolnikar K., Strunck E., Vollmer G., Michna H.: Ability of xeno-and phytoestrogens to modulate expression of estrogen sensitive genes in rat uterus: estrogenicity profiles and uterotropic activity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2000, 73, 1-10.10.1016/S0960-0760(00)00051-0 Search in Google Scholar

11. Heindel J.J., vom Saal F.S.: Meeting report: batch-to-batch variability in estrogenic activity in commercial animal diets - importance and approaches for laboratory animal research. Environ Health Perspect 2008, 116, 389-393.10.1289/ehp.10524226503518335108 Search in Google Scholar

12. Hendry W.J. III, Sheehan D.M., Khan S.A., May J.V.: Developing a laboratory animal model for perinatal endocrine disruption: the hamster chronicles. Exp Biol Med 2002, 227, 709-723.10.1177/15353702022270090412324652 Search in Google Scholar

13. Jensen M.N., Ritskes-Hoitinga M.: How isoflavone levels in common rodent diets can interfere with the value of animal models and with experimental results. Lab Anim 2007, 41, 1-18.10.1258/00236770777939942817234046 Search in Google Scholar

14. Kanno J., Kato H., Iwata T., Inoue T.: Phytoestrogen-low diet for endocrine disruptor studies. J Agric Food Chem 2002, 50, 3883-3885.10.1021/jf020235p12059176 Search in Google Scholar

15. Kanno J., Onyon L., Haseman J., Fenner-Crisp P., Ashby J., Owens W.: The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: Phase 1. Environ Health Perspect 2001, 109, 785-794.10.1289/ehp.01109785124040511564613 Search in Google Scholar

16. Kanno J., Onyon L., Peddada S., Ashby J., Jacob E., Owens W.: The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dose-response studies. Environ Health Perspect 2003, 111, 1530-1549. Search in Google Scholar

17. Kato H., Iwata T., Katsu Y., Watanabe H., Ohta Y., Iguchi T.: Evaluation of estrogenic activity in diets for experimental animals using in vitro assay. J Agric Food Chem 2004, 52, 1410-1414.10.1021/jf034896d14995154 Search in Google Scholar

18. Kim H.S., Kang T.S., Kang I.H., Kim T.S., Moon H.J., Kim I.Y., Ki H., Park K.L., Lee B.M., Yoo S.D., Han S.Y.: Validation study of OECD rodent uterotrophic assay for the assessment of estrogenic activity in Sprague-Dawley immature female rats. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2005, 68, 2249-2262.10.1080/1528739050018235416326438 Search in Google Scholar

19. Mead M.N.: The feed factor: estrogenic variability in lab animal diets. Environ Health Perspect 2006, 114, 640-642.10.1289/ehp.114-a640166542417107840 Search in Google Scholar

20. Naciff J.M., Overmann G.J., Torontali S.M., Carr G.J., Tiesman J.P., Daston G.P.: Impact of the phytoestrogen content of laboratory animal feed on the gene expression profile of the reproductive system in the immature female rat. Environ Health Perspect 2004, 112, 1519-1526.10.1289/ehp.6848124761615531437 Search in Google Scholar

21. Odum J., Tinwell H., Jones K., Van Miller J.P., Joiner R.L., Tobin G., Kawasaki H., Deghenghi R., Ashby J.: Effect of rodent diets on the sexual development of the rat. Toxicol Sci 2001, 61, 115-127.10.1093/toxsci/61.1.11511294982 Search in Google Scholar

22. OECD TG 440: Uterotrophic bioassay in rodents: A short-term screening test for oestrogenic properties. 2007. Search in Google Scholar

23. OECD TG 441: Hershberger bioassay in rats. A short-term screening assay for (anti) androgenic properties. 2009. Search in Google Scholar

24. Owens W., Ashby J., Odum J., Onyon L.: The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dietary phytoestrogen analyses. Environ Health Perspect 2003, 111, 1559-1567. Search in Google Scholar

25. Stochmal A., Oleszek W.: Seasonal and structural changes of flavones in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) aerial parts. J Food Agric Environ 2007, 5, 170-174. Search in Google Scholar

26. Stroheker T., Cabaton N., Berges R., Lamothe V., Lhuguenot J.C., Chagnon M.C.: Influence of dietary soy isoflavones on the accessory sex organs of the Wistar rat. Food Chem Toxicol 2003, 41, 1175-1183.10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00108-X Search in Google Scholar

27. Thigpen J.E., Haseman J.K., Saunders H., Locklear J., Caviness G., Grant M., Forsythe D.: Dietary factors affecting uterine weights of immature CD-1 mice used in uterotrophic bioassays. Cancer Detect Prev 2002, 26, 381-393.10.1016/S0361-090X(02)00122-8 Search in Google Scholar

28. Thigpen J.E., Haseman J.K., Saunders H.E., Setchell K.D.R., Grant M.G., Forsythe D.B.: Dietary phytoestrogens accelerate the time of vaginal opening in immature CD-1 mice. Comp Med 2003, 53, 607-615. Search in Google Scholar

29. Thigpen J.E., Setchell K.D.R., Saunders H.E., Haseman J.K., Grant M.G., Forsythe D.B.: Selecting the appropriate rodent diet for endocrine disruptor research and testing studies. ILAR J 2004, 45, 401-416.10.1093/ilar.45.4.40115454679 Search in Google Scholar

30. Unfer V., Casini M.L., Costabile L., Mignosa M., Gerli S., Di Renzo G.C.: Endometrial effects of long-term treatment with phytoestrogens: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril 2004, 82, 145-148.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.04115237003 Search in Google Scholar

31. vom Saal F.S., Richter C.A., Ruhlen R.R., Nagel S.C., Timms B.G., Welshons W.V.: The importance of appropriate controls, animal feed, and animal models in interpreting results from low-dose studies of bisphenol A. Birth Defects Res (Part A): Clin Mol Teratol 2005, 73, 140-145. 10.1002/bdra.2012015751043 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2300-3235
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Microbiology and Virology, other, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine