<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<sec><h3>Background</h3>
<p>A noteworthy attempt has recently been made to extend the same or analogous evaluation criteria traditionally employed in natural and technical sciences to social sciences and humanities domains. However, this endeavor has sparked considerable reactions among researchers, leading to robust discussions and debates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><h3>Objectives</h3>
<p>This research aims to describe the scholars’ perception of the research quality evaluation in Montenegro's social sciences and humanities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><h3>Methods/Approach</h3>
<p>Focus-group interviews in which 25 interlocutors from various fields of social sciences and humanities were used. The participants discussed the given topic in five focus group interviews and were prompted by questions that specified the topic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><h3>Results</h3>
<p>Different perceptions occur within the social sciences and humanities and are visible within individual areas. Respondents think that the current way of evaluating the results of research work in social sciences and humanities ignores the specificities of research methodologies and practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><h3>Conclusions</h3>
<p>The respondents show a common element of perception, i.e., that the research quality evaluation in the social sciences and humanities must be multidimensional, meaning that it must include the necessary indicators adjusted to concrete research field as much as possible but also contain agreeably qualitative criteria.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>

Background
A noteworthy attempt has recently been made to extend the same or analogous evaluation criteria traditionally employed in natural and technical sciences to social sciences and humanities domains. However, this endeavor has sparked considerable reactions among researchers, leading to robust discussions and debates.

Objectives
This research aims to describe the scholars’ perception of the research quality evaluation in Montenegro's social sciences and humanities.

Methods/Approach
Focus-group interviews in which 25 interlocutors from various fields of social sciences and humanities were used. The participants discussed the given topic in five focus group interviews and were prompted by questions that specified the topic.

Results
Different perceptions occur within the social sciences and humanities and are visible within individual areas. Respondents think that the current way of evaluating the results of research work in social sciences and humanities ignores the specificities of research methodologies and practices.

Conclusions
The respondents show a common element of perception, i.e., that the research quality evaluation in the social sciences and humanities must be multidimensional, meaning that it must include the necessary indicators adjusted to concrete research field as much as possible but also contain agreeably qualitative criteria.

Assessing the Appraisal of Research Quality in Social Sciences and Humanities: A Case Study of the University of Montenegro

Business Systems Research Journal

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Background
A noteworthy attempt has recently been made to extend the same or analogous evaluation criteria traditionally employed in natural and technical...

Assessing the Appraisal of Research Quality in Social Sciences and Humanities: A Case Study of the University of Montenegro

Pubblicato online: 21 set 2023

Pagine: 131 - 152

Ricevuto: 02 mag 2023

Accettato: 06 giu 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2023-0007

Parole chiave
social sciences and humanities, research quality, research quality perception, qualitative vs. quantitative evaluation

© 2023 Dijana Vučković et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Assessing the Appraisal of Research Quality in Social Sciences and Humanities: A Case Study of the University of Montenegro

Pubblicato online: 21 set 2023

Pagine: 131 - 152

Ricevuto: 02 mag 2023

Accettato: 06 giu 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2023-0007

Parole chiavesocial sciences and humanities, research quality, research quality perception, qualitative vs. quantitative evaluation

© 2023 Dijana Vučković et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Parole chiave
social sciences and humanities, research quality, research quality perception, qualitative vs. quantitative evaluation