1. bookVolume 12 (2021): Edizione 2 (December 2021)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1847-9375
Prima pubblicazione
19 Sep 2012
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
access type Accesso libero

The Effects of Electronic Surveillance on Job Tension, Task Performance and Organizational Trust

Pubblicato online: 10 Apr 2022
Volume & Edizione: Volume 12 (2021) - Edizione 2 (December 2021)
Pagine: 125 - 143
Ricevuto: 16 Apr 2020
Accettato: 15 Jul 2021
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1847-9375
Prima pubblicazione
19 Sep 2012
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Abstract

Background: In contemporary work models, employees use the Internet and electronic devices more than ever. This phenomenon has also changed the way of monitoring employees and generated a new form called ‘electronic surveillance’.

Objectives: The central purpose of this paper is to reveal the effects of electronic surveillance on job tension, task performance, and employees’ organizational trust.

Methods/Approach: Survey research was applied as a quantitative method to collect data. Surveys were generated as Likert-type scales, and they were distributed by hand because the use of the in-person survey technique was employed throughout the study. The research sample was created using the purposive sampling technique, and it included 228 participants from fifteen different branches of one of the biggest private banks in Turkey.

Results: Electronic surveillance in the workplace has turned out to have positive effects on job tension and task performance, whereas it harms organizational trust.

Conclusions: When the degree of electronic surveillance increases, the job tension level of employees tends to increase as well. Additionally, task performance increases when electronic surveillance increases. But this is not the case with organizational trust since electronic surveillance affects it negatively.

Keywords

JEL Classification

1. Abraham, M., Niessen, C., Schnabel, C., Lorek, K., Grimm, V., Möslein, K., Wrede, M. (2019), “Electronic monitoring at work: The role of attitudes, functions, and perceived control for the acceptance of tracking Technologies”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 657-675.10.1111/1748-8583.12250 Search in Google Scholar

2. Aiello, J. R., Kolb, K. J. (1995), “Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 80 No. 3, pp. 339-353.10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.339 Search in Google Scholar

3. Aiello, J. R., Svec, C. M. (1993), “Computer Monitoring of Work Performance: Extending the Social Facilitation Framework to Electronic Presence”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 537-548.10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01102.x Search in Google Scholar

4. Allen, M. W., Coopman, S. J., Hart, J. L., Walker, K. L. (2007), “Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries”, Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 172-200.10.1177/0893318907306033 Search in Google Scholar

5. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) (2015), “Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys”, available at https://www.aapor.org (12 May 2020) Search in Google Scholar

6. American Management Association (2019), “The Latest on Workplace Monitoring and Surveillance”, available at https://www.amanet.org/articles/the-latest-on-workplace-monitoring-and-surveillance (21 September 2019) Search in Google Scholar

7. Andrews, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Kacmar, C. (2015), “The interactive effects of behavioral integrity and procedural justice on employee job tension”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 126 No. 3, pp. 371-379.10.1007/s10551-013-1951-4 Search in Google Scholar

8. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. (2007), “The job demands-resources model: State of the art”, Journal of managerial psychology, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 309-328.10.1108/02683940710733115 Search in Google Scholar

9. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014), “Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach”, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1, pp. 389-411.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235 Search in Google Scholar

10. Bakker, A. B., Van Veldhoven, M., Xanthopoulou, D. (2010), “Beyond the demand-control model: Thriving on high job demands and resources”, Journal of Personnel Psychology, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 3-16.10.1027/1866-5888/a000006 Search in Google Scholar

11. Bhave, D. P. (2014), “The invisible eye? Electronic performance monitoring and employee job performance”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 67 No. 3, pp. 605-635. Search in Google Scholar

12. Bijlsma, K., Koopman, P. (2003), “Introduction: trust within organisations”, Personnel Review, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 543-555.10.1108/00483480310488324 Search in Google Scholar

13. Borman, W. C., Motowidlo, S. J. (1997), “Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research”, Human Performance, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 99-109.10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3 Search in Google Scholar

14. Carlson, J. R., Carlson, D. S., Zivnuska, S., Harris, R. B., Harris, K. J. (2017), “Applying the job demands resources model to understand technology as a predictor of turnover intentions”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 77, pp. 317-325.10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.009 Search in Google Scholar

15. Conway, J. M. (1999), “Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84 No. 1,pp. 3-13.10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3 Search in Google Scholar

16. Costigan, R. D., Ilter, S. S., Berman, J. J. (1998), “A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations”, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 303-317. Search in Google Scholar

17. D’Urso, S. C. (2006), “ Who’s watching us at work? Toward a structural–perceptual model of electronic monitoring and surveillance in organizations”, Communication Theory, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 281-303.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00271.x Search in Google Scholar

18. DeConinck, J. B. (2010), “The effect of organizational justice, perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees’ level of trust”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63 No.12, pp. 1349-1355.10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.01.003 Search in Google Scholar

19. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Gevers, J. M. (2015), “Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 91, pp. 87-96.10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001 Search in Google Scholar

20. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W. B. (2001), “The job demands-resources model of burnout”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 3, pp. 499-512.10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 Search in Google Scholar

21. Dirks, K. T., Ferrin, D. L. (2002), “Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87 No. 4, pp. 611-628.10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 Search in Google Scholar

22. Eivazi, K. (2011), “Computer use monitoring and privacy at work”, Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 516-523.10.1016/j.clsr.2011.07.003 Search in Google Scholar

23. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., Alkassim, R. S. (2016), “Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling”, American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-4.10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 Search in Google Scholar

24. Field, A. (2000), Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows, Sage Publications, London. Search in Google Scholar

25. Goodman, S. A., Svyantek, D. J. (1999), “Person–organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 254-275.10.1006/jvbe.1998.1682 Search in Google Scholar

26. Goomas, D. T., Ludwig, T. D. (2009), “Standardized goals and performance feedback aggregated beyond the work unit: Optimizing the use of engineered labor standards and electronic performance monitoring”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 39 No.10, pp. 2425-2437.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00532.x Search in Google Scholar

27. Griffith, T. L. (1993), “Monitoring and Performance: A Comparison of Computer and Supervisor Monitoring”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 549-572.10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01103.x Search in Google Scholar

28. Holland, P. J., Cooper, B., Hecker, R. (2015), “Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace: The effects on trust in management, and the moderating role of occupational type”, Personnel Review, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 161-175.10.1108/PR-11-2013-0211 Search in Google Scholar

29. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M. R. (2008), “Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit”, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 53-60. Search in Google Scholar

30. House, R. J., Rizzo, J. R. (1972), “Toward the measurement of organizational practices: Scale development and validation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 56 No. 5, pp. 388-396.10.1037/h0033444 Search in Google Scholar

31. Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999), “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 1-55.10.1080/10705519909540118 Search in Google Scholar

32. Irving, P. G., Coleman, D. F. (2003), “The moderating effect of different forms of commitment on role ambiguity-job tension relations”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 97-106.10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00696.x Search in Google Scholar

33. Jensen, J. M., Raver, J. L. (2012), “When self-management and surveillance collide: Consequences for employees’ organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors”, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 308-346.10.1177/1059601112445804 Search in Google Scholar

34. Johnson-George, C., Swap, W. C. (1982), “Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 1306-1317.10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1306 Search in Google Scholar

35. Jones, S. L., Shah, P. P. (2016), “Diagnosing the locus of trust: A temporal perspective for trustor, trustee, and dyadic influences on perceived trustworthiness”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 101 No. 3, pp. 392-414.10.1037/apl0000041 Search in Google Scholar

36. Keenan, A., Newton, T. J. (1984), “Frustration in organizations: Relationships to role stress, climate, and psychological strain”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 57 No.1, pp. 57-65.10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00148.x Search in Google Scholar

37. Kim, W. C., Mauborgne, R. A. (1996), “Procedural justice and managers’ in-role and extra-role behavior: The case of the multinational”, Management Science, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 499-515.10.1287/mnsc.42.4.499 Search in Google Scholar

38. Klenke-Hamel, K. E., Mathieu, J. E. (1990), “Role strains, tension, and job satisfaction influences on employees’ propensity to leave: A multi-sample replication and extension”, Human Relations, Vol. 43 No. 8, pp. 791-807.10.1177/001872679004300806 Search in Google Scholar

39. Laschinger, H. K. S., Finegan, J., Shamian, J. (2001), “The impact of workplace empowerment, organizational trust on staff nurses’ work satisfaction and organizational commitment”, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 7-23.10.1097/00004010-200107000-00002 Search in Google Scholar

40. Lau, C. M., Tan, S. L. (2006), “The effects of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust on job tension in budgeting”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 171-186.10.1016/j.mar.2005.10.001 Search in Google Scholar

41. Lawrence, E. R., Kacmar, K. M. (2012), “Leader-member exchange and stress: The mediating role of job involvement and role conflict”, Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, Vol. 14 No.1, pp. 39-53.10.21818/001c.17904 Search in Google Scholar

42. Le, P. B., Lei, H. (2018), “The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 521-537.10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0463 Search in Google Scholar

43. Leat, M., El-Kot, G. (2009), “Interpersonal trust at work, intrinsic motivation, work-related tension and satisfaction in Egypt”, International Journal of Workplace Health Management, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 180-194.10.1108/17538350910970237 Search in Google Scholar

44. Lee, S., Kleiner, B. H. (2003), “Electronic surveillance in the workplace”, Management Research News, Vol. 26 No. 2/3/4, pp. 72-81.10.1108/01409170310784014 Search in Google Scholar

45. Lee, Y. J., Ahn, J. S., Kim, M. J. (2018), “The Relationship between Organizational Justice, Organizational Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Hospital Office Workers, Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Hospital Scales”, The Korean Journal of Health Service Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 13-22.10.12811/kshsm.2018.12.1.013 Search in Google Scholar

46. Li, M., Perez-Diaz, P. A., Mao, Y., Petrides, K. V. (2018), “A multilevel model of teadhers’ job performance: Understanding the effects of trait emotional intelligence, job satisfaction and organizational trust”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, pp. 1-13. Search in Google Scholar

47. Lusch, R. F., Serpkenci, R. R. (1990).” Personal differences, job tension, job outcomes, and store performance: A study of retail store managers”. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No.1, pp. 85-101. Search in Google Scholar

48. Lyons, T. F. (1971), “Role clarity, need for clarity, satisfaction, tension, and withdrawal”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 99-110.10.1016/0030-5073(71)90007-9 Search in Google Scholar

49. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Peschar, J. L. (2006). “OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries”, International Journal of Testing, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 311-360.10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1 Search in Google Scholar

50. Martin, A. J., Wellen, J. M., Grimmer, M. R. (2016), “An eye on your work: How empowerment affects the relationship between electronic surveillance and counterproductive work behaviours”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 27 No. 21, pp. 2635-2651.10.1080/09585192.2016.1225313 Search in Google Scholar

51. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. (1995), “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 709-734.10.2307/258792 Search in Google Scholar

52. Milner, K., Fisher, J., Chandraprakash, A. (2007), “Organisational climate, job tension and job satisfaction in a South African call centre case study”, Ergonomics SA: Journal of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 22-30. Search in Google Scholar

53. Mishra, J. M., Crampton, S. M. (1998), “Employee monitoring: privacy in the workplace?”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 4-14. Search in Google Scholar

54. Moore, S., Hayes, L. J. B. (2017), “Taking worker productivity to a new level? Electronic Monitoring in homecare - the (re) production of unpaid labour”, New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 101-114.10.1111/ntwe.12087 Search in Google Scholar

55. Motowidlo, S. J., Van Scotter, J. R. (1994), “Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance”, Journal of Applied psychology, Vol. 79 No. 4, pp. 475-480.10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475 Search in Google Scholar

56. Moussa, M. (2015), “Monitoring employee behavior through the use of technology and issues of employee privacy in America”, Sage Open, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 1-13.10.1177/2158244015580168 Search in Google Scholar

57. Ng, T. W. (2015), “The incremental validity of organizational commitment, organizational trust, and organizational identification”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 88, pp. 154-163.10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.003 Search in Google Scholar

58. Ning, L. I., Jin, Y. A. N., Mingxuan, J. I. N. (2007), “How does organizational trust benefit work performance?”, Frontiers of Business Research in China, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 622-637.10.1007/s11782-007-0035-7 Search in Google Scholar

59. Nisar S. K., Rasheed, M. I. (2020), “Stress and performance: Investigating relationships between occupational stres, career satisfaction, and job performance of police employees”, Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 20, No.1, pp. 1-9.10.1002/pa.1986 Search in Google Scholar

60. O’Donnell, A. T., Jetten, J., Ryan, M. K. (2010), “Watching over your own: How surveillance moderates the impact of shared identity on perceptions of leaders and follower behaviour”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 40 No. 6, pp. 1046-1061.10.1002/ejsp.701 Search in Google Scholar

61. Oz, E., Glass, R., Behling, R. (1999), “Electronic workplace monitoring: what employees think”, Omega, International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 167-177.10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00037-1 Search in Google Scholar

62. Pirson, M., Malhotra, D. (2011), “Foundations of organizational trust: What matters to different stakeholders?”, Organization Science, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 1087-1104.10.1287/orsc.1100.0581 Search in Google Scholar

63. Pool, S. W. (2000), “Organizational culture and its relationship between job tension in measuring outcomes among business executives”, Journal of management development. Vol. 19 No.1, pp. 32-49.10.1108/02621710010308144 Search in Google Scholar

64. Schaubroeck, J., Cotton, J. L., Jennings, K. R. (1989), “Antecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysis”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 35-58.10.1002/job.4030100104 Search in Google Scholar

65. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H. (2003), “Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures”, Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 23-74. Search in Google Scholar

66. Searle, R., Den Hartog, D. N., Weibel, A., Gillespie, N., Six, F., Hatzakis, T., Skinner, D. (2011), “Trust in the employer: The role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice in European organizations”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 1069-1092.10.1080/09585192.2011.556782 Search in Google Scholar

67. Smith, W. P., Tabak, F. (2009), “Monitoring employee e-mails: Is there any room for privacy?”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 33-48.10.5465/AMP.2009.45590139 Search in Google Scholar

68. Snyder, J. L. (2010), “E-mail privacy in the workplace: A boundary regulation perspective”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 266-294.10.1177/0021943610369783 Search in Google Scholar

69. Spitzmüller, C., Stanton, J. M. (2006). “Examining employee compliance with organizational surveillance and monitoring”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 79 No. 2, pp. 245-272. Search in Google Scholar

70. Srivastava, A. P., Dhar, R. L. (2019), “Authentic leadership and extra role behavior: A school based integrated model”, Current Psychology, Vol. 38 No.3, pp. 684-697.10.1007/s12144-017-9634-4 Search in Google Scholar

71. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2001), Using multivariate statistics, Allyn and Bacon, New York. Search in Google Scholar

72. Tabak, F., Smith, W. P. (2005), “Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust development”. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 173-189.10.1007/s10672-005-6940-z Search in Google Scholar

73. Tourigny, L., Han, J., Baba, V. V., Pan, P. (2019), “Ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility in China: A multilevel study of their effects on trust and organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 158 No. 2, pp. 427-440.10.1007/s10551-017-3745-6 Search in Google Scholar

74. Urbaczewski, A., Jessup, L. M. (2002), “Does electronic monitoring of employee internet usage work?”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 80-83.10.1145/502269.502303 Search in Google Scholar

75. Van Dyne, L., LePine, J. A. (1998), “Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 108-119. Search in Google Scholar

76. Verburg, R. M., Nienaber, A. M., Searle, R. H., Weibel, A., Den Hartog, D. N., Rupp, D. E. (2018), “The role of organizational control systems in employees’ organizational trust and performance outcomes”, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 179-206.10.1177/1059601117725191 Search in Google Scholar

77. Watson, A. M., Foster Thompson, L., Rudolph, J. V., Whelan, T. J., Behrend, T. S., Gissel, A. L. (2013), “When big brother is watching: Goal orientation shapes reactions to electronic monitoring during online training”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 98 No. 4, pp. 642-657.10.1037/a0032002 Search in Google Scholar

78. Weeks, W. A., Nantel, J. (1992), “Corporate codes of ethics and sales force behavior: A case study”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 11 No. 10, pp. 753-760.10.1007/BF00872307 Search in Google Scholar

79. Yost, A. B., Behrend, T. S., Howardson, G., Darrow, J. B., Jensen, J. M. (2019), “Reactance to electronic surveillance: a test of antecedents and outcomes”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 71-86.10.1007/s10869-018-9532-2 Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo