Accesso libero

Interpreting the Interoperability of the Nato’s Communication and Information Systems

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Barry, C. L. (2003). Transforming NATO Command and Control for Future Missions. WA, USA: National Defense University Press – Defense Horizons.10.21236/ADA422451Search in Google Scholar

Binnendijk, H., Gompert, D. C., & Kugler, R. L. (2005). A New NATO Military Framework. WA, USA: National Defense University Press – Defense Horizons.Search in Google Scholar

Burita, L. (2010). Command and Control Information Systems Interoperability in NATO, Conference ICMT’10-IDEB’10, Vol. 1, Bratislava, Slovak: TnUAD, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-environment-for-achieving-C2IS-systems-interoperability-in-NATO-To-facilitate-C2IS_fig1_288446125.Search in Google Scholar

Farkas, T., & Hronyecz, E. (2017). Info-communication areas of modernizing field C2 systems and command posts in the interest of successful home defense-peace operations- and disaster-management tasks. NY, USA: IEEE 15th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics: SISY 2017.10.1109/SISY.2017.8080582Search in Google Scholar

Munk, S. (2002). An analysis of basic interoperability related terms, system of interoperability types. Budapest, Hungary: National University of Public Service – AARMS.Search in Google Scholar

Munk, S. (2018). Interoperability Services Supporting Information Exchange Between Cybersecurity Organisations. Budapest, Hungary: National University of Public Service – AARMS.10.32565/aarms.2018.3.9Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (1999). The Reader’s Guide to the NATO Summit in Washington. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2003). The Prague Summit and NATO’s Transformation. A Reader’s Guide. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2005). NATO Network Enabled Capability Feasibility Study. Executive Summary: Version 2.0. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2016). FMN for Coalition Operations. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2017). Allied Joint Doctrine for communication and information systems. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2018). ACT engagement in Federated Mission Networking (FMN). Brussels, Beligum: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2019). Coalition Warrior Interoperability exercise, available at: https://www.act.nato.int/cwix.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Establishing a HLA certification process in NATO, available at: https://www.mscoe.org/nmsg-134-ivct-integration-verification-certification-tool/.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Mission. Brussels, Belgium: Author, available at: https://lc.nato.int/about-us/mission.Search in Google Scholar

Sciore, E., Siegel, M, & Rosenthal, A. (1994). Using Semantic Values to Facilitate Interoperability Among Heterogeneous Information Systems. Journal ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), Vol. 19, Issue 2, NY, USA: ACM Digital Library.10.1145/176567.176570Search in Google Scholar

Shilovitsky, O. (2014). IoT and PLM have common problem – data interoperability, available at: http://beyondplm.com/2014/09/26/iot-and-plm-have-common-problem-data-interoperability/.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2451-3148
ISSN:
1224-5178
Lingua:
Inglese