Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Die Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment
Volume 72 (2021): Numero 3 (September 2021)
Accesso libero
Localization accuracy of a robot platform using indoor positioning methods in a realistic outdoor setting
Georg Supper
Georg Supper
,
Norbert Barta
Norbert Barta
,
Andreas Gronauer
Andreas Gronauer
e
Viktoria Motsch
Viktoria Motsch
| 23 giu 2022
Die Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment
Volume 72 (2021): Numero 3 (September 2021)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Pubblicato online:
23 giu 2022
Pagine:
133 - 139
Ricevuto:
22 set 2021
Accettato:
18 nov 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2021-0014
Parole chiave
Robotics
,
automation
,
Monte Carlo localization
,
precision agriculture
,
sensor technology
© 2021 Georg Supper et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Experimental setup. (a) Picture of the field robot “Mathilda.” (b) Picture of the outdoor laboratory. (c) Map of the outdoor laboratory generated using a laser scanner and the ROS “gmapping” node with the starting area (yellow), the commonly used paths (blue), and target positions (green), as well as the Vicon Vantage V5 (red) camera positions indicated. ROS, robot operating systemAbbildung 1. Versuchsaufbau. a) Bild des Feldroboters “Mathilda”. b) Bild des Freilandlabors. c) Mit einem Laserscanner und dem ROS “gmapping”-Knoten erstellte Karte des Freilandlabors mit Angabe des Startbereichs (gelb), der gemeinsamen Wege (blau) und Zielpositionen (grün) sowie der Kamerapositionen der Vicon Vantage V5 (rot).
Figure 2
Boxplot of the deviation of the actual position to the target position. (a) Distance error in x-direction, (b) distance error in y-direction, (c) absolute distance error d, and (d) angular error ΔΨ for the two positions and the positions pooled together. Green lines indicate hysteresis threshold. Data are from 11 and 10 successful runs for position 1 and 2, respectively.Abbildung 2. Boxplot der Abweichung der Ist-Position von der Soll-Position. a) Abstandsfehler in x-Richtung, b) Abstandsfehler in y-Richtung, c) absoluter Abstandsfehler d und d) Winkelfehler ΔΨ für die beiden Positionen und die zusammengefassten Positionen. Grüne Linien zeigen die Hysterese. Die Daten stammen aus 11 bzw. 10 erfolgreichen Läufen für Position 1 bzw. 2.