Accesso libero

Array-comparative genomic hybridization results in clinically affected cases with apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Jacobs PA, Browne C, Gregson N, Joyce C, White H. Estimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of banding. J Med Genet. 1992; 29(2): 103-108.JacobsPABrowneCGregsonNJoyceCWhiteHEstimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of bandingJ Med Genet199229210310810.1136/jmg.29.2.10310158481613759Search in Google Scholar

Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Lundsteen C. High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics. J Med Genet. 2001; 38(11): 740-744.KirchhoffMRoseHLundsteenCHigh resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogeneticsJ Med Genet2001381174074410.1136/jmg.38.11.740173475611694545Search in Google Scholar

Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: Clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 49(5): 995-1013.WarburtonDDe novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: Clinical significance and distribution of breakpointsAm J Hum Genet19914959951013Search in Google Scholar

Madan K, Nieuwint AW, van Bever Y. Recombination in a balanced complex translocation of a mother leading to a balanced reciprocal translocation in the child. Review of 60 cases of balanced complex translocations. Hum Genet. 1997; 99(6): 806-815.MadanKNieuwintAWvanBever YRecombination in a balanced complex translocation of a mother leading to a balanced reciprocal translocation in the childReview of 60 cases of balanced complex translocations. Hum Genet199799680681510.1007/s0043900504539187678Search in Google Scholar

Sismani C, Kitsiou-Tzeli S, Ioannides M, Christodoulou C, Anastasiadou V, Stylianidou G, et al. Cryptic genomic imbalances in patients with de novo or familial apparently balanced translocations and abnormal phenotype. Mol Cytogenet. 2008; 1(7): 15-23.SismaniCKitsiou-TzeliSIoannidesMChristodoulouCAnastasiadouVStylianidouGet alCryptic genomic imbalances in patients with de novo or familial apparently balanced translocations and abnormal phenotypeMol Cytogenet200817152310.1186/1755-8166-1-15251651718644119Search in Google Scholar

Menten B, Maas N, Thienpont B, Buysse K, Vandesompele J, Melotte C, et al. Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: A new series of 140 patients and review of published reports. J Med Genet. 2006; 43(8): 625-633.MentenBMaasNThienpontBBuysseKVandesompeleJMelotteCet alEmerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: A new series of 140 patients and review of published reportsJ Med Genet200643862563310.1136/jmg.2005.039453256458316490798Search in Google Scholar

Rauch A, Rüschendorf F, Huang J, Trautmann U, Becker C, Thiel C, et al. Molecular karyotyping using an SNP array for genomewide genotyping. J Med Genet. 2004; 41(12): 916-922.RauchARüschendorfFHuangJTrautmannUBeckerCThielCet alMolecular karyotyping using an SNP array for genomewide genotypingJ Med Genet2004411291692210.1136/jmg.2004.022855173563915591277Search in Google Scholar

Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020; 22(2): 245-257.RiggsERAndersenEFCherryAMKantarciSKearneyHPatelAet alTechnical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)Genet Med202022224525710.1038/s41436-019-0686-8731339031690835Search in Google Scholar

South ST, Lee C, Lamb AN, Higgins AW, Kearney HM; Working Group for the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Laboratory Quality Assuarance Committee. ACMG Standards and Guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic microarray analysis, including postnatal and prenatal applications: Revision 2013. Genet Med. 2013; 15(11): 901909 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2407193/SouthSTLeeCLambANHigginsAWKearneyHM; Working Group for the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Laboratory Quality Assuarance CommitteeACMG Standards and Guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic microarray analysis, including postnatal and prenatal applications: Revision 2013Genet Med20131511901909https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2407193/10.1038/gim.2013.12924071793Search in Google Scholar

Darilek S, Ward P, Pursley A, Plunkett K, Furman P, Magoulas P, et al. Pre- and postnatal genetic testing by array-comparative genomic hybridization: Genetic counseling perspectives. Genet Med. 2008; 10(1): 13-18.DarilekSWardPPursleyAPlunkettKFurmanPMagoulasPet alPre- and postnatal genetic testing by array-comparative genomic hybridization: Genetic counseling perspectivesGenet Med2008101131810.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f1ddb18197052Search in Google Scholar

De Gregori M, Ciccone R, Magini P, Pramparo T, Gimelli S, Messa J, et al. Cryptic deletions are a common finding in “balanced” reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: A study of 59 patients. J Med Genet. 2007; 44(12): 750-762.DeGregori MCicconeRMaginiPPramparoTGimelliSMessaJet alCryptic deletions are a common finding in “balanced” reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: A study of 59 patientsJ Med Genet2007441275076210.1136/jmg.2007.052787265281017766364Search in Google Scholar

Feenstra I, Hanemaaijer N, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Yntema H, Dijkhuizen T, Lugtenberg D, et al. Balanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011; 19(11): 1152-1160.FeenstraIHanemaaijerNSikkema-RaddatzBYntemaHDijkhuizenTLugtenbergDet alBalanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysisEur J Hum Genet201119111152116010.1038/ejhg.2011.120319814521712853Search in Google Scholar

Gribble SM, Prigmore E, Burford DC, Porter KM, Ng BL, Douglas EJ, et al. The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes. J Med Genet. 2005; 42(1): 8-16.GribbleSMPrigmoreEBurfordDCPorterKMNgBLDouglasEJet alThe complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypesJ Med Genet200542181610.1136/jmg.2004.024141173591415635069Search in Google Scholar

Schluth-Bolard C, Delobel B, Sanlaville D, Boute O, Cuisset JM, Sukno S, et al. Cryptic genomic imbalances in de novo and inherited apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements: Array CGH study of 47 unrelated cases. Eur J Med Genet. 2009; 52(5): 291-296.Schluth-BolardCDelobelBSanlavilleDBouteOCuissetJMSuknoSet alCryptic genomic imbalances in de novo and inherited apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements: Array CGH study of 47 unrelated casesEur J Med Genet200952529129610.1016/j.ejmg.2009.05.01119505601Search in Google Scholar

Tabet AC, Verloes A, Pilorge M, Delaby E, Delorme R, Nygren G, et al. Complex nature of apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements in patients with autism spectrum disorder. Mol Autism. 2015; 6(5): 19-32.TabetACVerloesAPilorgeMDelabyEDelormeRNygrenGet alComplex nature of apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements in patients with autism spectrum disorderMol Autism201565193210.1186/s13229-015-0015-2438429125844147Search in Google Scholar

Gijsbers AC, Bosch CA, Dauwerse JG, Giromus O, Hansson K, Hilhorst-Hofstee Y, et al. Additional cryptic CNVs in mentally retarded patients with apparently balanced karyotypes. Eur J Med Genet. 2010; 53(5): 227-233.GijsbersACBoschCADauwerseJGGiromusOHanssonKHilhorst-HofsteeYet alAdditional cryptic CNVs in mentally retarded patients with apparently balanced karyotypesEur J Med Genet201053522723310.1016/j.ejmg.2010.06.00320542150Search in Google Scholar

Yakut S, Cetin Z, Clark OA, Nur BG, Mihci E, Karauzum SB. Associations between the clinical findings of cases having submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances at chromosomal breakpoints of apparently balanced structural rearrangements. Gene Rep. 2017; 7(7): 50-58 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452014417300092).YakutSCetinZClarkOANurBGMihciEKarauzumSBAssociations between the clinical findings of cases having submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances at chromosomal breakpoints of apparently balanced structural rearrangementsGene Rep2017775058https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245201441730009210.1016/j.genrep.2017.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Dong Z, Wang H, Chen H, Jiang H, Yuan J, Yang Z, et al. Identification of balanced chromosomal rearrangements previously unknown among participants in the 1000 Genomes Project: Implications for interpretation of structural variation in genomes and the future of clinical cytogenetics. Genet Med. 2018; 20(7): 697-707.DongZWangHChenHJiangHYuanJYangZet alIdentification of balanced chromosomal rearrangements previously unknown among participants in the 1000 Genomes Project: Implications for interpretation of structural variation in genomes and the future of clinical cytogeneticsGenet Med201820769770710.1038/gim.2017.170593228029095815Search in Google Scholar

van Bon BW, Balciuniene J, Fruhman G, Naga-mani SC, Broome DL, Cameron E, et al. The phenotype of recurrent 10q22q23 deletions and duplications. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011; 19(4): 400-408.vanBon BWBalciunieneJFruhmanGNaga-maniSCBroomeDLCameronEet alThe phenotype of recurrent 10q22q23 deletions and duplicationsEur J Hum Genet201119440040810.1038/ejhg.2010.211306032421248748Search in Google Scholar

Nenadic I, Maitra R, Scherpiet S, Gaser C, Schultz CC, Schachtzabel C, et al. Glutamate receptor δ1 (GRID1) genetic variation and brain structure in schizophrenia. J Psychiat Res. 2012; 46(12): 1531-1539.NenadicIMaitraRScherpietSGaserCSchultzCCSchachtzabelCet alGlutamate receptor δ1 (GRID1) genetic variation and brain structure in schizophreniaJ Psychiat Res201246121531153910.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.08.02623017809Search in Google Scholar

Treutlein J, Mühleisen TW, Frank J, Mattheisen M, Herms S, Ludwig KU, et al. Dissection of phenotype reveals possible association between schizophrenia and Glutamate Receptor Delta 1 (GRID1) gene promoter. J Psychiatr Res. 2009; 111(1-3): 123-130 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19346103/TreutleinJMühleisenTWFrankJMattheisenMHermsSLudwigKUet alDissection of phenotype reveals possible association between schizophrenia and Glutamate Receptor Delta 1 (GRID1) gene promoterJ Psychiatr Res20091111-3123130https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19346103/10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.01119346103Search in Google Scholar

Evangelidou P, Sismani C, Ioannides M, Christodoulou C, Koumbaris G, Kallikas I, et al. Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations. Mol Cytogenet. 2010; 3: 24.EvangelidouPSismaniCIoannidesMChristodoulouCKoumbarisGKallikasIet alClinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrationsMol Cytogenet201032410.1186/1755-8166-3-24300236621110858Search in Google Scholar

Armour CM, Dougan SD, Brock JA, Chari R, Chodirker BN, DeBie I, et al. Practice guideline: Joint CCMG-SOGC recommendations for the use of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis and assessment of fetal loss in Canada. J Med Genet. 2018; 55(4): 215-221.ArmourCMDouganSDBrockJAChariRChodirkerBNDeBieIet alPractice guideline: Joint CCMG-SOGC recommendations for the use of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis and assessment of fetal loss in CanadaJ Med Genet201855421522110.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105013586945629496978Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Rosenfeld JA, Neill NJ, Ballif BC, Coppinger J, et al. Referral patterns for microarray testing in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2012; 32(4): 344-350.ShafferLGDabellMPRosenfeldJANeillNJBallifBCCoppingerJet alReferral patterns for microarray testing in prenatal diagnosisPrenat Diagn201232434435010.1002/pd.385622467165Search in Google Scholar

Vanakker O, Vilain C, Janssens K, Van der Aa N, Smits G, Bandelier C, et al. Implementation of genomic arrays in prenatal diagnosis: The Belgian approach to meet the challenges. Eur J Med Genet. 2014; 57(4): 151-156.VanakkerOVilainCJanssensKVander Aa NSmitsGBandelierCet alImplementation of genomic arrays in prenatal diagnosis: The Belgian approach to meet the challengesEur J Med Genet201457415115610.1016/j.ejmg.2014.02.00224534801Search in Google Scholar

Levy B, Burnside RD. Are all chromosome microarrays the same? What clinicians need to know. Prenat Diagn. 2019; 39(3): 157-164.LevyBBurnsideRDAre all chromosome microarrays the same? What clinicians need to knowPrenat Diagn201939315716410.1002/pd.542230673135Search in Google Scholar

Shinawi M, Liu P, Kang S-HL, Shen J, Belmont JW, Scott DA, et al. Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. J Med Genet. 2010; 47(5): 332-341.ShinawiMLiuPKangS-HLShenJBelmontJWScottDAet alRecurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head sizeJ Med Genet201047533234110.1136/jmg.2009.073015315856619914906Search in Google Scholar

Weiss LA, Shen Y, Korn JM, Arking DE, Miller DT, Fossdal R, et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(7): 667-675.WeissLAShenYKornJMArkingDEMillerDTFossdalRet alAssociation between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autismN Engl J Med2008358766767510.1056/NEJMoa07597418184952Search in Google Scholar

D’Angelo D, Lebon S, Chen Q, Martin-Brevet S, Snyder LG, Hippolyte L, et al.; Cardiff University Experiences of Children with Copy Number Variants (ECHO) Study; 16p11.2 European Consortium; Simons Variation in Individuals Project (VIP) Consortium. Defining the effect of the 16p11.2 duplication on cognition, behavior, and medical comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016; 73(1): 20-30.D’AngeloDLebonSChenQMartin-BrevetSSnyderLGHippolyteLet alCardiff University Experiences of Children with Copy Number Variants (ECHO) Study; 16p11.2 European Consortium; Simons Variation in Individuals Project (VIP) ConsortiumDefining the effect of the 16p11.2 duplication on cognition, behavior, and medical comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry2016731203010.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2123589447726629640Search in Google Scholar

Shinawi M, Cheung SW. The array CGH and its clinical applications. Drug Discov Today. 2008; 13(1718): 760-770.ShinawiMCheungSWThe array CGH and its clinical applicationsDrug Discov Today200813171876077010.1016/j.drudis.2008.06.00718617013Search in Google Scholar

Trippe H, Wieczorek S, Kötting J, Kress W, Schara U. Xp21/A translocation: A rarely considered genetic cause for manifesting carriers of duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuropediatrics. 2014; 45(5): 333-335.TrippeHWieczorekSKöttingJKressWScharaUXp21/A translocation: A rarely considered genetic cause for manifesting carriers of duchenne muscular dystrophyNeuropediatrics201445533333510.1055/s-0034-138382425046452Search in Google Scholar

Hatch EM, Hetzer MW. Chromothripsis. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(10): R397-R399.HatchEMHetzerMWChromothripsisCurr Biol20152510R397R39910.1016/j.cub.2015.02.03325989073Search in Google Scholar

Liu P, Carvalho CMB, Hastings PJ, Lupski JR. Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012; 22(3): 211-220.LiuPCarvalhoCMBHastingsPJLupskiJRMechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangementsCurr Opin Genet Dev201222321122010.1016/j.gde.2012.02.012337880522440479Search in Google Scholar

Baptista J, Mercer C, Prigmore E, Gribble SM, Carter NP, Maloney V, et al. Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: Comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort. Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82(4): 927-936.BaptistaJMercerCPrigmoreEGribbleSMCarterNPMaloneyVet alBreakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: Comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohortAm J Hum Genet200882492793610.1016/j.ajhg.2008.02.012242723718371933Search in Google Scholar

Chen W, Ullmann R, Langnick C, Menzel C, Wotschofsky Z, Hu H, et al. Breakpoint analysis of balanced chromosome rearrangements by next-generation paired-end sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010; 18(5): 539-543.ChenWUllmannRLangnickCMenzelCWotschofskyZHuHet alBreakpoint analysis of balanced chromosome rearrangements by next-generation paired-end sequencingEur J Hum Genet201018553954310.1038/ejhg.2009.211298731119953122Search in Google Scholar

Talkowski ME, Ernst C, Heilbut A, Chiang C, Hanscom C, Lindgren A, et al. Next-generation sequencing strategies enable routine detection of balanced chromosome rearrangements for clinical diagnostics and genetic research. Am J Hum Genet. 2011; 88(4): 469-481.TalkowskiMEErnstCHeilbutAChiangCHanscomCLindgrenAet alNext-generation sequencing strategies enable routine detection of balanced chromosome rearrangements for clinical diagnostics and genetic researchAm J Hum Genet201188446948110.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.013307191921473983Search in Google Scholar

Higgins AW, Alkuraya FS, Bosco AF, Brown KK, Bruns GA, Donovan DJ, et al. Characterization of apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements from the developmental genome anatomy project. Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82(3): 712-722.HigginsAWAlkurayaFSBoscoAFBrownKKBrunsGADonovanDJet alCharacterization of apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements from the developmental genome anatomy projectAm J Hum Genet200882371272210.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.011242720618319076Search in Google Scholar

Simioni M, Artiguenave F, Meyer V, Sgardioli IC, Viguetti-Campos NL, Lopes Monlleó I, et al. Genomic investigation of balanced chromosomal rearrangements in patients with abnormal phenotypes. Mol Syndromol. 2017; 8(4): 187-194.SimioniMArtiguenaveFMeyerVSgardioliICViguetti-CamposNLLopesMonlleó Iet alGenomic investigation of balanced chromosomal rearrangements in patients with abnormal phenotypesMol Syndromol20178418719410.1159/000477084549895828690484Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1311-0160
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
2 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other