“Access Denied” – Interpreting the Digital Divide by Examining the Right of Prisoners to Access the Internet in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights

1 Blanchard, Michele, Atari Metcalf and Jane Burns. “Bridging the Digital Divide: Creating opportunities for marginalised young people marginalised young people to get connected.” Inspire Foundation – University of Melbourne report (2007): 1–51. Search in Google Scholar

2 Blomberg, Matt, et al. “Digital divide and marginalized women during COVID-19: a study of women recently released from prison.” Information, Communication and Society 24(14) (2021): 2113–2132 // DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1963462 Search in Google Scholar

3 Borges, Jorge Luís. Collected Fictions. London: Penguin Books, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

4 Böcskei, Balázs, Marianna Fekete, Ádám Nagy and Andrea Szabó. “Az iskolában ennél jobb átlagom még soha nem volt: egyfolytában ötöst kaptam” – Az online oktatás a magyar fiatalok percepciói alapján.” (“I never had a better average than this at school: I got straight A’s all the time” - Online education as perceived by young Hungarians) Új Pedagógiai Szemle 72(1–2) (2023): 31–48. Search in Google Scholar

5 Dickerson, Hollin K. “Judging the Judges: The State of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe on the Eve of Accession.” International Journal of Legal Information 32(3) (2004): 539–581 // DOI:10.1017/S073112650000442X Search in Google Scholar

6 Gaál, Irén and Anikó Müller. A büntetés-végrehajtási jogszabályok magyarázata (Explanation of prison legislation). Budapest: Wolters Kluwer, 2019 // DOI:10.55413/9789632958347 Search in Google Scholar

7 Gerlitz, Merten. “The Human Right to Free Internet Access.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 37(2) (2019): 314–331. Search in Google Scholar

8 Gosztonyi, Gergely. Censorship from Plato to Social Media. The Complexity of Social Media’s Content Regulation and Moderation Practices. Cham: Springer, 2023) // DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-46529-1 Search in Google Scholar

9 Gosztonyi, Gergely. “Prison Radios: Communication on the Periphery of a Society.” Mediální studia 1 (2018): 133–139. Search in Google Scholar

10 Harrison, Lisa. “Prisoners and Their Access to the Internet in the Pursuit of Education.” Alternative Law Journal 39(3) (2014): 159–162 // DOI:10.1177/1037969X1403900304 Search in Google Scholar

11 Hussain, Syed Tauseef, et al. “Examining the status of prison libraries around the world: A literature review.” IFLA Journal 49(1) (2022) // DOI:10.1177/03400352221078032 Search in Google Scholar

12 Koch, Arnd. “Die Entwicklung des Strafrechts zwischen 1751 und 1813” (The development of criminal law between 1751 and 1813): 39–67. In: Arnd Koch, Michael Kubiciel, Martin Löhnig and Michael Pawlik, eds., Feuerbachs Bayerisches Strafgesetzbuch (Feuerbach’s Bavarian Penal Code). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

13 Lendvai, Gergely. “Hybrid Regimes and the Right to Access the Internet – findings from Turkey and Russia in the context of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.” ELTE Law Journal 12(2) (2024) forthcoming. Search in Google Scholar

14 Lupač, Petr. Beyond The Digital Divide: Contextualizing The Information Society. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2019 // DOI:10.1108/9781787565470 Search in Google Scholar

15 Lythreatis, Sophie, Sanjay Kumar Singh, and Abdul-Nasser El-Kassar. “The digital divide: A review and future research agenda.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 175(2) (2022): 530–544 // DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359 Search in Google Scholar

16 Magida, Ayanda and Brian Armstrong. “The Third Level Digital Divide: Millennials and Post-Millennials Online Activities in South Africa.” ICICTID 2022: International Conference on ICT, Innovation and Development, Vancouver, Canada (2022). Search in Google Scholar

17 McCowan, Tristan. Education as a Human Right: Principles for a Universal Entitlement to Learning. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

18 Mezey, Barna. A börtönügy a 17–19. században. A börtön európai útja (The prison system in the 17th-19th centuries. The European way of the prison). Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

19 Mubarak, Farooq and Reima Suomi. “Elderly Forgotten? Digital Exclusion in the Information Age and the Rising Grey Digital Divide.” Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 59(1) (2022): 907–921 // DOI:10.1177/00469580221096272 Search in Google Scholar

20 Nash, Susan. The Pandemic Has Accelerated The Need To Close The Digital Divide For Older Adults // https://longevity.stanford.edu/the-pandemic-has-accelerated-the-need-to-close-the-digital-divide-for-older-adults/ Search in Google Scholar

21 Orcan, Necdet U. “Legitimate Aims, Illegitimate Aims and the E.Ct.H.R.: Changing Attitudes and Selective Strictness.” University of Bologna Law Review 7(1) (2022): 7–40 // DOI:10.6092/issn.2531-6133/14860 Search in Google Scholar

22 Oster, Jan. Media Freedom as a Fundamental Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 // DOI:10.1017/CBO9781316162736 Search in Google Scholar

23 Piazolo, Daniel. “The Digital Divide.” CESifo Forum 2(3) (2001): 29–34 // DOI:10.2139/ssrn.288963 Search in Google Scholar

24 Pulido, Manuel Lázaro: “Challenges to the Educational “Digital Divide” in Spanish Prisons.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 29(2) (2023): 263–281 // DOI:10.1007/s10610-021-09493-4 Search in Google Scholar

25 Pushter, Jacob. Internet access growing worldwide but remains higher in advanced economies // https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2016/02/22/internet-access-growing-worldwide-but-remains-higher-in-advanced-economies/ Search in Google Scholar

26 Reisdorf, Bianca C., Julia R. DeCook. “Locked up and left out: Formerly incarcerated people in the context of digital inclusion.” New Media and Society 24 (2022) // DOI:10.1177/14614448211063178 Search in Google Scholar

27 Reisdorf, Bianca C., Yvonne Jewkes. “(B)Locked sites: cases of Internet use in three British prisons.“ Information, Society and Society 6 (2016): 771–786 // DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153124 Search in Google Scholar

28 Scharff Smith, Peter. “Imprisonment and internet-access: Human rights, the principle of normalization and the question of prisoners access to digital communications technology.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 30(4) (2012): 454–482. DOI:10.18261/ISSN1891-814X-2012-04-04 Search in Google Scholar

29 van Dijk, Jan. The Digital Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

30 Voorhoof, Dirk. European Court of Human Rights: Kalda v. Estonia. IRIS 4(2) (2016): 1–2. Search in Google Scholar

31 Voorhoof, Dirk. European Court of Human Rights: Ramazan Demir v. Turkey. IRIS 9(4) (2021): 1–2. Search in Google Scholar

32 Yu, Peter K. “Bridging the Digital Divide: Equality in the Information Age.” Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 20(1) (2023): 1–52. Search in Google Scholar

1 Braganza, Emily (Jurist). Europe rights court rules Turkish authorities violated detained lawyer’s freedom to receive information. (11 February 2021) // https://www.jurist.org/news/2021/02/europe-rights-court-rules-turkish-authorities-violated-detained-lawyers-freedom-to-receive-information Search in Google Scholar

2 Ciufoletti, Sofia (European Prison Litigation Network). Out of the cage, into the net. Understanding Access to the Internet in Prison as a Human Right. (2021) // https://www.prisonlitigation.org/internet-as-a-human-right Search in Google Scholar

3 HUDOC. Case database. // https://hudoc.echr.coe.int Search in Google Scholar

4 National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling through the Net: A survey of the “have nots” in rural and urban America. (July 1995) // www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html Search in Google Scholar

5 Tynan, Dan (The Guardian). Online behind bars: if internet access is a human right, should prisoners have it? (3 October 2016) // https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/03/prison-internet-access-tablets-edovo-jpay Search in Google Scholar

1 Cengiz and Others v Turkey. European Court of Human Rights, Applications No. 48226/10 and 14027/11, judgment of the Court of 1 December 2015. Search in Google Scholar

2 Chocholáč v. Slovakia. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 81292/17, Judgment of the Court of 7 July 2022. Search in Google Scholar

3 Delfi AS v Estonia. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 64569/09, Judgment of the Court of 16 June 2015. Search in Google Scholar

4 Donaldson v United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 56975/09, Decision of the Court of 25 January 2011. Search in Google Scholar

5 Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2). European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 74025/01, Judgment of the Court of 6 October 2005. Search in Google Scholar

6 Jankovskis v Lithuania. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 21575/08, judgment of the Court of 17 January 2017. Search in Google Scholar

7 Kalda v Estonia. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 14581/20, judgment of the Court of 6 December 2022. Search in Google Scholar

8 Kalda v Estonia. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 17429/10, Judgment of the Court of 19 January 2016. Search in Google Scholar

9 Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v Russia. European Court of Human Rights, Applications No. 11082/06 and 13772/05, Judgment of the Court of 25 July 2013. Search in Google Scholar

10 Klibisz v Poland. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 2235/02, Judgment of the Court of 4 October 2016. Search in Google Scholar

11 Mehmet Çiftçi and Suat İncedere v Turkey. European Court of Human Rights, Applications No. 21266/19 and 21774/19, judgment of the Court of 18 January 2022. Search in Google Scholar

12 Murray v Netherlands. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 10511/10, Judgment of the Court of 2 April 2016. Search in Google Scholar

13 Muršić v Croatia. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 7334/13, Judgment of the Court of 20 October 2016. Search in Google Scholar

14 Nilsen v United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 36882/05, judgment of the Court of 9 March 2010. Search in Google Scholar

15 Ramazan Demir v Turkey. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 68550/17, Judgment of the Court of 9 February 2021. Search in Google Scholar

16 Yankov v Bulgaria. European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 39084/97, Judgment of the Court of 11 December 2003. Search in Google Scholar