1. bookVolume 15 (2022): Edizione 1 (October 2022)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2029-0454
Prima pubblicazione
05 Feb 2009
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Digital Transformation of Legal Services and Access to Justice: Challenges and Possibilities

Pubblicato online: 07 Jan 2023
Volume & Edizione: Volume 15 (2022) - Edizione 1 (October 2022)
Pagine: 141 - 172
Ricevuto: 16 May 2022
Accettato: 26 Jul 2022
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2029-0454
Prima pubblicazione
05 Feb 2009
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

1. Amilevičius, Darius. “Machine Bias and Fundamental Rights”: 334–365. In: John Gordon, ed. Smart Technologies and Fundamental Rights. Leiden: Brill, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

2. Ashley, Kevin D. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

3. Assy, Rabeeae. Injustice in Person: The Right to Self-Representation. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2015.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687442.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

4. Bard, Alexander, and Jan Soderqvist. Syntheism: Creating God in the Internet Age. Stockholm Text, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

5. Bass, Julia, W. A. Bogart, and Frederick H. Zemans, eds. Access to Justice for a New Century—The Way Forward. Toronto: Law Society of Upper Canada, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

6. Beltagy, I. “Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer.” 2020 // https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.05150.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

7. Chalkidis, Ilias, et al. “Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English.” 2019 // https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.02059.pdf.10.18653/v1/P19-1424 Search in Google Scholar

8. Cui, Yadong. Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Modernization. Cham: Springer/Shanghai People’s Publishing House. 2020.10.1007/978-981-32-9880-4 Search in Google Scholar

9. European Parliamentary Research Service. Common Minimum Standards of Civil Procedure, European Added Value Assessment. Annex I. Strasbourg: European Parliament, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

10. European Parliamentary Research Service. Language Equality in the Digital Age. Strasbourg: European Parliament, 2017 // https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fa0a50e7-cda4-11e7-a5d5-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF. Search in Google Scholar

11. Francioni, Francesco, ed. Access to Justice as a Human Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233083.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

12. Freeman, Michal, and Fiona Smith, eds. Law and Language. Vol. 15. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

13. George, A. S., and A. H. George. “Industrial Revolution 5.0: The Transformation of the Modern Manufacturing Process to Enable Man and Machine to Work Hand in Hand.” Seybold Report 15, no. 9 (2020): 214–234. Search in Google Scholar

14. Goodrich, Peter. Legal Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987.10.1007/978-1-349-11283-8 Search in Google Scholar

15. Hager, John W. “Let’s Simplify Legal Language.” Rocky Mountain Law Review 32 (1959): 74–86. Search in Google Scholar

16. Hildebrandt, Mireille. Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law: Novel Entanglements of Law and Technology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

17. Holder, Chris, Vikram Khurana, Faye Harrison, and Louisa Jacobs. “Robotics and Law: Key Legal and Regulatory Implications of the Robotics Age (Part I of II).” Computer Law & Security Review 32, no. 3 (June 2016): 383–402 // https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.03.001. Search in Google Scholar

18. Kiršienė, Julija, Christopher Kelley, Deividas Kiršys, and Juras Žymančius. “Rethinking the Implications of Transformative Economic Innovations: Mapping Challenges of Private Law.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 12, no. 2 (2019): 47–77.10.2478/bjlp-2019-0011 Search in Google Scholar

19. Kiršienė, Julija, Edita Gruodytė, and Darius Amilevičius. “From Computerised Thing to Digital Being: Mission (Im) Possible?” AI & Society 36, no. 2 (2021): 547–60.10.1007/s00146-020-01051-6 Search in Google Scholar

20. Li V., and S. la Roque-Doherty. “Toward Smarter Courts: Artificial Intelligence Has Made Great Inroads—But Not as Far as Increasing Access to Civil Justice.” ABA Journal 107, no. 2 (April/May 2021) // https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&u=anon~b1a1800&id=GALE|A655942226&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-EAIM&asid=e697e6f6. Search in Google Scholar

21. Manuel, Marcus, and Clare Manuel. “People-Centred Justice for All: A Route to Scaling Up Access to Justice Advice and Assistance in Low-Income Countries.” 2021 // https://odi.org/en/publications/people-centred-justice-for-all/. Search in Google Scholar

22. Marcus, Garry. “Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal.” 2018 // https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1801/1801.00631.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

23. McShane, M., and S. Nirenburg. Linguistics for the Age of AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021.10.7551/mitpress/13618.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

24. Mellinkoff, David. The Language of the Law. New York: Little, Brown and Co., 1963. Search in Google Scholar

25. Meskys, Edvinas, Aidas Liaudanskas, Julija Kalpokiene, and Paulius Jurcys. “Regulating Deep Fakes: Legal and Ethical Considerations.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 15, no. 1 (2020): 24–31.10.1093/jiplp/jpz167 Search in Google Scholar

26. Mubarak, Usama. Role of Legislative Drafting in Victimization of Citizens (2020) // http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3656529.10.2139/ssrn.3656529 Search in Google Scholar

27. OECD and Law & Justice Foundation of New South Wales. Access to Justice and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Compendium of Country Practices (Paris and Sydney: OECD and Law & Justice Foundation of New South Wales, 2020) // https://www.oecd.org/governance/global-roundtables-access-to-justice/access-to-justice-compendium-of-country-practices.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

28. Philips, Alfred. Lawyers’ Language: How and Why Legal Language is Different. New York, Routledge. 2003. Search in Google Scholar

29. Queensland Law Society. “Access to Justice Scorecard.” 2021 // https://www.qls.com.au/Pages/Advocacy/Accessto-Justice-Scorecard. Search in Google Scholar

30. Schumpeter, J. A. The Theory of Economic Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1983. Search in Google Scholar

31. Shikhar, Sanjana. “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law.” 2021 // https://blog.ipleaders.in/role-of-artificial-intelligence-in-law/. Search in Google Scholar

32. Statal Commission for Lithuanian Language. Guidelines for the Development of the Lithuanian Language in Information Technology 2014–2020. Vilnius: Republic of Lithuania, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

33. Susskind, Richard. The Future of Law: Facing the Challenges of Information Technologies. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1998. Search in Google Scholar

34. Turing, Alan. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59, no. 236 (1950): 433–460.10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433 Search in Google Scholar

35. United Nations. “World Social Report 2020: Inequality in a Rapidly Changing World” // https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/01/World-Social-Report-2020-FullReport.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

36. Vladeck, David C. “Machines Without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence.” Washington Law Review 89, no. 1 (March 2014): 117–150. Search in Google Scholar

37. Waelbers, Katinka, and Tsjalling Swierstra. “The Family of the Future: How Technologies Can Lead to Moral Change”: 219–236. In: Jeroen van den Hoven, Neelke Doorn, Tsjalling Swierstra, Bert-Jaap Koops, and Henny Romijn, eds. Responsible Innovation 1. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014 // https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_12. Search in Google Scholar

38. World Economic Forum. “Values, Ethics and Innovation: Rethinking Technological Development in the Fourth Industrial Revolution” // https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/values-ethics-and-innovation-rethinking-technological-development-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/. Search in Google Scholar

39. World Justice Project. “Global Insights on Access to Justice 2019” // https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/publications/special-reports/global-insights-access-justice-2019. Search in Google Scholar

40. Xiao, Chaojun, et al. “Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documents.” 2021 // https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.03887.pdf.10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.06.003 Search in Google Scholar

41. Zhong, Haoxi. “How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence.” 2020 // https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.12158.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.466 Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo