<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The Federalist Papers are a set of eighty-five essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay during the founding era of the United States, with the purpose of persuading the states to adopt the Constitution as the replacement for the Articles of Confederation. The Papers were some of the most impressive political writings of the time, and are still cited frequently today by the United States Supreme Court. The arguments set forth in the Papers attempted to defend the Constitution's aristocratic characteristics against its opponents, the Anti-Federalists, while also attempting to normalize an anti-democratic, representative form of government in the minds of the American people. The clever advocacy and skillful rhetoric employed by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay led to the eventual ratification of the Constitution, and consequently the creation of the most powerful and prosperous nation on the planet. This paper examines the differences between the traditional forms of government, the political philosophies of the Papers’ authors, the anti-democratic, aristocratic nature of the government proposed by the Constitution, and the arguments for and against its adoption, as articulated in the Papers and various other writings.</p>
</abstract>

The Federalist Papers are a set of eighty-five essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay during the founding era of the United States, with the purpose of persuading the states to adopt the Constitution as the replacement for the Articles of Confederation. The Papers were some of the most impressive political writings of the time, and are still cited frequently today by the United States Supreme Court. The arguments set forth in the Papers attempted to defend the Constitution's aristocratic characteristics against its opponents, the Anti-Federalists, while also attempting to normalize an anti-democratic, representative form of government in the minds of the American people. The clever advocacy and skillful rhetoric employed by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay led to the eventual ratification of the Constitution, and consequently the creation of the most powerful and prosperous nation on the planet. This paper examines the differences between the traditional forms of government, the political philosophies of the Papers’ authors, the anti-democratic, aristocratic nature of the government proposed by the Constitution, and the arguments for and against its adoption, as articulated in the Papers and various other writings.

Rule by the Few in the Federalist Papers: An Examination of the Aristocratic Preference of Publius

B.A. Political Science, Kent State University

British Journal of American Legal Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The Federalist Papers are a set of eighty-five essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay during the founding era of the United States,...

Rule by the Few in the Federalist Papers: An Examination of the Aristocratic Preference of Publius

Pubblicato online: 31 ott 2020

Pagine: 217 - 244

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjals-2020-0020

Parole chiave
Federalist Papers, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Aristocracy, Constitution

© 2021 Carl M. Felice, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Rule by the Few in the Federalist Papers: An Examination of the Aristocratic Preference of Publius

Pubblicato online: 31 ott 2020

Pagine: 217 - 244

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjals-2020-0020

Parole chiaveFederalist Papers, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Aristocracy, Constitution

© 2021 Carl M. Felice, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Parole chiave
Federalist Papers, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Aristocracy, Constitution