[
Ambroży-Deręgowska K., Szulc P. (2021): Influence of different sowing density in two varieties of maize. Part I. Relation to yielding. Biometrical Letters 58(2): 199-208.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boote K.B., Jones J.W., Pickering N.B. (1996): Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agronomy Journal 88: 704-716.10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800050005x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borowiecki J., Filipiak K. (1992): Wybór liści wskaźnikowych do określenia powierzchni liściowej kukurydzy. Pamiętnik Puławski, Zeszyt 100: 77-85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greveniotis V., Zotis S., Sioki E., Ipsilandis C. (2019); Field population density effects on field yield and morphological characteristics of maize. Agriculture 9: 160.10.3390/agriculture9070160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jagła M., Sobiech Ł., Szulc P., Nowosad K., Bocianowski J., Grzanka M. (2020): Sensitivity assessment of varieties, effectiveness of weed control by selected herbicides in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation. Agronomy 10: 1115.10.3390/agronomy10081115
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Łącka A., Nowosad K., Bocianowski J., Szulc P. (2021): Heredity of chloroplast pigments parameters of maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 66, M5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li F.Y., Jamieson P.D., Pearson A.J. (2006): Amaize N: Developing a decision-support tool to optimize nitrogen management of maize. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 36: 61-70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muchow R.C., Davies R. (1988): Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment II. Radiation interception and biomass accumulation. Field Crops Research 18: 17-30.10.1016/0378-4290(88)90056-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pandey R.K., Maranville J.W., Chetima M.M. (2000): Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment. II. Shoot growth, nitrogen uptake and water extraction. Agriculture and Water Management 46: 15-27.10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00074-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scharf P.C., Brouder M.S., Hoeft G.R. (2006): Chlorophyll meter readings can predict nitrogen need and yield response of corn in the North-Central USA. Agronomy Journal 98: 655-665.10.2134/agronj2005.0070
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szulc P., Ambroży-Deręgowska K., Mejza I., Kobus-Cisowska J., Ligaj M. (2020a): The role of agrotechnical factors in shaping protein yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Sustainability 12: 6833.10.3390/su12176833
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szulc P., Bocianowski J., Rybus-Zając M. (2013): Influence of soil supplementation with nitrogen and magnesium on the size of assimilation area of maize cultivars (Zea mays L.) differing in genetic profile. EJPAU, 16(2) #01.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szulc P., Mejza, I., Ambroży-Deręgowska, K., Nowosad, K., Bocianowski, J. (2016): The comparison of three models applied to the analysis of three-factor trial on hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. Biometrical Letters 53(1): 47-57.10.1515/bile-2016-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szulc P., Ambroży-Deręgowska K., Mejza I., Zawadzka A., Zielewicz W., Byczkiewicz S. (2020b): The reaction of two types of maize cultivars (Zea mays L.) to different sowing density. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 65 (2): 12-17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tollenaar M., Dwyer L.M. (1999): Physiology of maize, pp. 169-204. In: Crop yield: Physiology and processes. Eds. Smith, D.L.; Hamel, C. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York.10.1007/978-3-642-58554-8_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zielewicz W., Wróbel B., Szulc P., Bujak H., Stachowiak B. (2021): By-plant prediction of dry matter yields at various growth stages of maize plants (Zea mays L.) using leaf greenness indicator in climatic conditions of Poland. Applied Sciences 11: 9513.10.3390/app11209513
]Search in Google Scholar
