Accesso libero

Mitigating Devices within the Context of Two-Way Mediated Shop Conversations

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Agar, M., 1983. Institutional discourse. Text 5(3): 147–168.10.1515/text.1.1985.5.3.147Search in Google Scholar

Brown, P.–Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Channell, J. 1990. Precise and vague quantities in writings on economics. In: The writing scholar. Newbury Park: Sage. 95–117.Search in Google Scholar

Cheepen, C. 2000. Small talk in service dialogs: The conversational aspects of transactional telephone talk. In: Small talk. London: Longman. 288–311.10.4324/9781315838328-16Search in Google Scholar

Drew, P.–Heritage, J. 1992. Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In: Drew, P.– Heritage, J. (eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3–65.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, P.–Sorjonen, M.-L. 1997. Institutional dialogue. In: van Dijk, T. (ed.), Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage. 92–118.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Grainger, K.–Mills, S. 2016. Theoretical perspectives on indirectness. In: Directness and indirectness across cultures. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137340399Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics 113: 16–29.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, A. H.–Smith, S. W.–Ludge, T. 2003. Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1737–1769.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00188-1Search in Google Scholar

Koester, A. 2010. Workplace discourse. London–New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 1972. Hedges, a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. 183–228.Search in Google Scholar

Lamerichs, J.–te Molder, H. 2011. Reflecting on your own talk: The discursive action method at work. Applied conversation analysis. Palgrave advances in linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 184–206.10.1057/9780230316874_10Search in Google Scholar

Markkanen, R.–Schroder, H. 1997. Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In: Markkanen, R.–Schroder, H. (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 3–20.10.1515/9783110807332.3Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, D.–Schaeffer, N.–Freese, J. 2011. Improving response rates in telephone interviews. Applied conversation analysis. Palgrave advances in linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 54–74.10.1057/9780230316874_4Search in Google Scholar

O’Keeffe, A. 2006. Investigating media discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203015704Search in Google Scholar

Paul Gee, J. 2017. Introducing discourse analysis – From grammar to society. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Preisler, B. 1986. Linguistic sex roles in conversation: Social variation in the expression of tentativeness in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110862973Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, S.–Parastou, F. 2014. Discourse analysis – Putting our worlds into words. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Audio/Audio-Players/SoundScriber.shtml (downloaded on: 07.15.2020).Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2391-8179
Lingue:
Inglese, Tedesco
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
3 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Cultural Studies, General Cultural Studies, Linguistics and Semiotics, Applied Linguistics, other, Literary Studies, general