Use of Photogrammetry in Documenting Ruins/Traces of Cultural Heritage Not Surviving to the Present Day: A Comparative Case Study

1. Vlachos, M., Berger, L., Mathelier, R. Agrafiotis, P., Skarlatos, D. Software Comparison for Underwater Archaeological Photogrammetric Applications. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 27th CIPA International Symposium “Documenting the past for a better future”, 1–5 September 2019, Ávila, Spain, vol. XLII-2/W15, 2019, pp. 1195–1201. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-1195-201910.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-1195-2019 Search in Google Scholar

2. Fangi, G., Nardinocchi, C., Rubeca, G. “Centochiese”: A Hundred Churches In Rome: An Archival Photogrammetric Project. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 27th CIPA International Symposium “Documenting the past for a better future”, 1–5 September 2019, Ávila, Spain, vol. XLII-2/W15, 2019, pp. 457–463. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-457-201910.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-457-2019 Search in Google Scholar

3. Almagro, A. Photogrammetry for Everybody [online]. 17th CIPA Symposium, 3–6 October 1999, Olinda, Brazil [cited 08.05.2020]. https://www.cipaheritagedocumentation.org/activities/conferences/proceedings_1999/ Search in Google Scholar

4. Şahoğlu, V. M. Ö. 3. binde Anadolu-Kiklad ilişkileri (The relations between Anatolia and the Cyclades in the 3rd millenium BC). Ankara: Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara University, 1997. 158 p. Search in Google Scholar

5. Baldıran, A. Iasos Antik Kenti 2017 Yılı Çalışmaları (2017 Iasos Ancient Cıiy Studies). 40. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, vol. 1, 2018, pp. 237–250. [cited 01.05.2021]. https://avesis.istanbul.edu.tr/api/publication/abcab222-c66a-4e96-8f82-a908a8867181/file Search in Google Scholar

6. Baldoni, D., Franco C., Manara M., Paolo B., Berti F. Carian Iasos. İstanbul: Homer Archaeological Guides, 2004. 144 p. Search in Google Scholar

7. Pierobon-Benoit, R. Paralypros chora: il territorio di Iasos alla luce delle recenti ricognizioni, Iasos e la Caria. Nuovi studi e ricerche. In R. Pierobon Benoit ed., La Parola del Passato, vol. 60, no. 2–6, 2005, pp. 200–44. Search in Google Scholar

8. Pierobon-Benoit, R. Il territorio di Iasos: nuove ricerche (2006–2008). Labraunda and Karia: Proceedings of the International Symposium Commemoratine Sixty Years of Swedish Archaeological Work in Labraunda, 20‒21 November, 2008, Uppsala, Stockholm, vol. 32, 2011, pp. 389–425. Search in Google Scholar

9. Peirano, D. Carian Iasos in Byzantine Age. Proceeding of the 23rd International Congress of Byzantine Studies, Thematic Sessions of Free Communications, 22–27 August, 2016, Belgrade, Serbia, 2016, pp. 555–556. [cited 01.05.2021]. https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11501 Search in Google Scholar

10. Serin, U. Karya’daki Geç Antik ve Bizans Dönemi Yapı ve Yerleşimleri Üzerine Bazı Gözlemler (Some Observations on the Late Antique and Byzantine Sites and Settlements in Caria). METU JFA, vol. 30, no. 1, 2013, pp. 191–211. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2013.1.1010.4305/METU.JFA.2013.1.10 Search in Google Scholar

11. Spanu, M. Iasos 2011. 34. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, vol. 2, 2013, pp. 445–454. Search in Google Scholar

12. Strabon (ancient writer). Geographika (Antik Anadolu Coğrafyası, Kitap XII, XIII, XIV) (N. Başgelen ed.). İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları. 2000. XIV.2, C658, 21. Search in Google Scholar

13. Pausanias (ancient writer). Description of Greece (Phocis and Ozolian Locri) (In W. H. S. Jones, Litt. D., and H. A. Ormerod translation). London: Harvard University Press, William Heinemann Ltd., 1918. X.IV.1. Search in Google Scholar

14. Vitruvius (ancient writer). Mimarlık Üzerine On Kitap (V, VIII, CXI) (F. Yeğül, A. Cengizkan, B. Güvenç, H. ve Pamir eds.). İstanbul: Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı, 1998. V, III, 2 ‒ V, VII, 2. Search in Google Scholar

15. General Settlement Plan of Iasos Ancient City. Milas/Mugla: Milas Municipality Archive, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

16. Image of traces of Iasos Ancient Theatre, 2020 [online]. Google Earth Pro Maxar Technologies [cited 12.04.2020]. https://www.maxar.com Search in Google Scholar

17. Kıvılcım, C. Ö., Duran, Z. A. Semi-Automated Point Cloud Processing Methodology for 3d Cultural Heritage Documentation. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXIII ISPRS Congress, 12–19 July 2016, Prague, Czech Republic, vol. XLI-B5, 2016, pp. 293–296. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-293-201610.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-293-2016 Search in Google Scholar

18. Abdur Rani, F. M., Rusli, N. The Accuracy Assessment of Agisoft PhotoScan and Pix4D Mapper Software in Orthophoto Production. Geomatics Research Innovation Competition, vol. 1, 2017, pp. 1–5. Search in Google Scholar

19. Mohd Maasom, M. A. Accuracy Assesssment of Agisoft Photoscan and Pix4d Mapper in Orthophoto and Dem Production. Shah Alam: Faculty of Architecture, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 2020. 51 p. [cited 01.05.2021]. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33665/ Search in Google Scholar

20. Duran, Z., Atik, E. M., Çelik, M. F. Yersel Fotogrametrik Yöntem ile Yersel Lazer Taramanın Karşılaştırılması ve Doğruluk Analizi (Comparison of Terrestrial Photogrammetry and Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Accuracy Analysis). Harita Dergisi, vol. 158, 2017, pp. 20–25. Search in Google Scholar

21. Adamopoulos, E., Rinaudo, F. UAS-Based Archaeological Remote Sensing: Review. Meta-Analysis and State-of-the- Art. Drones, vol. 4, no. 3, 46, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones403004610.3390/drones4030046 Search in Google Scholar

22. Brooke, C., Clutterbuck, B. Mapping Heterogeneous Buried Archaeological Features Using Multisensor Data from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 1, 41, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1201004110.3390/rs12010041 Search in Google Scholar

23. Lynne, M. R., Krumnow, J. On the fly: Strategies for UAV-based archaeological survey in mountainous areas of Central Asia and their implications for landscape research. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 30, 2020, 102275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.10227510.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102275 Search in Google Scholar

24. Yücel, M. A., Yılmaz, D. Çanakkale ili insansız hava aracı destekli yüzey araştırması (Çanakkale Province: Unmanned Air Vehicle Assited Surface Survey). Anadolu Araştırmaları- Anatolian Research, vol. 22, 2019, pp. 107–128. https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.2019.22.63311410.26650/anar.2019.22.633114 Search in Google Scholar

25. Agapiou, A., Lysandrou, V. Remote sensing archaeology: Tracking and mapping evolution in European scientific literature from 1999 to 2015. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 4, 2015, pp. 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.09.01010.1016/j.jasrep.2015.09.010 Search in Google Scholar

26. McLeester, M., Casana, J., Schurr, M. R., Hill, A. C., Wheeler, J. H. Detecting prehistoric landscape features using thermal, multispectral, and historical imagery analysis at Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie, Illinois. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, vol. 21, 2018, pp. 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.08.01610.1016/j.jasrep.2018.08.016 Search in Google Scholar

27. Kincey, M., Batty, L., Chapman, H., Gearey, B., Ainsworth, S., Challis, K. Assessing the changing condition of industrial archaeological remains on Alston Moor, UK, using multisensor remote sensing. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 45, 2014, pp. 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.02.00810.1016/j.jas.2014.02.008 Search in Google Scholar

28. Opitz, R., Herrmann, J. Recent Trends and Long-standing Problems in Archaeological Remote Sensing. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, vol. 1, no. 1, 2018, pp. 19–41. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.1110.5334/jcaa.11 Search in Google Scholar

29. Parisi, E. I., Suma, M., Güleç Korumaz, A., Rosina, E., Tucci, G. Aerial platforms (UAV) surveys in the VIS and TIR range. Applications on archaeology and agriculture. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-2/W11, 2019, pp. 945–952. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-945-201910.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-945-2019 Search in Google Scholar

30. Poirier, N., Hautefeuille, F., Calastrenc, C. Low Altitude Thermal Survey by Means of an Automated Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for the Detection of Archaeological Buried Structures: Thermal Archaeological Survey by Automated Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Archaeological Prospection, vol. 20, 2013, pp. 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.145410.1002/arp.1454 Search in Google Scholar

31. Rowlands, A., Sarris, A. Detection of exposed and subsurface archaeological remains using multi-sensor remote sensing. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 34, 2007, pp. 795–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.06.01810.1016/j.jas.2006.06.018 Search in Google Scholar

32. Santos, M., Disney, M., Chave, J. Detecting Human Presence and Influence on Neotropical Forests with Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 10, 2018, 1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1010159310.3390/rs10101593 Search in Google Scholar

33. Tapete, D. (ed.). Earth Observation, Remote Sensing, and Geoscientific Ground Investigations for Archaeological and Heritage Research. Geosciences, vol. 9, 2019. 304 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-03921-194-410.3390/books978-3-03921-194-4 Search in Google Scholar

34. Campana, S. Drones in Archaeology. State-of-the-art and Future Perspectives. Archaeological Prospection, vol. 24, 2017, pp. 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.156910.1002/arp.1569 Search in Google Scholar

35. Skrypitsyna, T., Kurkov, V., Zhuravlev, D., Knyaz, V., Batasova, A. Study of the hidden ancient anthropogenic landscapes using digital models of microtopography. Proceedings Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXVI, 20 September 2020, vol. 11533, 2020. 115331F. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.257299510.1117/12.2572995 Search in Google Scholar

36. Aliberti, L., Iglesias Picazo, P. Close-Range Photogrammetry Practice: Graphic Documentation of The Interior of The Walls of Avila (Spain). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 27th CIPA International Symposium “Documenting the past for a better future”, 1–5 September 2019, Ávila, Spain, vol. XLII-2/W15, 2019, pp. 49–53. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-49-201910.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-49-2019 Search in Google Scholar

37. Carvajal-Ramírez, F., Martínez-Carridondo, P., Yero- Paneque, L., Agüera-Vega, F. UAV Photogrammetry and HBIM for the Virtual Reconstruction of Heritage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 27th CIPA International Symposium “Documenting the past for a better future”, 1–5 September 2019, Ávila, Spain, vol. XLII-2/W15, 2019, pp. 271–278. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-271-201910.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-271-2019 Search in Google Scholar

38. Marshall, M. E., Johnson, A. A., Summerskill, S. J., Baird Q., Esteban E. Automating Photogrammetry for the 3D Digitisation of Small Artefact Collections. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 27th CIPA International Symposium “Documenting the past for a better future”, 1–5 September 2019, Ávila, Spain, vol. XLII-2/W15, 2019, pp. 751–757. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-751-201910.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-751-2019 Search in Google Scholar

39. Letellier, R. Recording, Documentation, and Information Management for the Conservation of Heritage Places: Guiding Principles. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 2007. 38 p. Search in Google Scholar

40. CIPA. Optimisation des Relevés Photogrammétriques D’architecture. Paris: UNESCO, 1981. 60 p. Search in Google Scholar