[
1. Throsby, D. Economic and culture, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press, 2001, 228 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Hillegas, J.V. Defining sustainability. 2010 [online]. Sustainability History Project [cited 02.07.2020]. https://sustainabilityhistory.org/defining-sustainability/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Brown, M., Haselsteiner, E., Apró, D., Kopeva, D., Luca, E., Pulkkinen, K., Vula Rizvanolli, B. Sustainability, restorative to regenerative. COST Action CA16114 RESTORE, Working Group One Report: Restorative Sustainability, 2018 [online, cited 03.03.2020]. https://www.eurestore.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Sustainability-Restorative-to-Regenerative.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Istiadji, A.D., Hardiman, G., Satwiko, P. What is the sustainable method enough for our built environment? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 213, 2018, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/01201610.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Guy, S., Farmer, G. Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: the place of technology. Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 54, Issue 3, 2001, pp. 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1162/1046488015263245110.1162/10464880152632451
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Berardi, U. Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 8, 2013, pp. 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.00810.1016/j.scs.2013.01.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Cole, R. J. Regenerative design and development: Current theory and practice. Building Research & Information, Vol. 40, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.61751610.1080/09613218.2012.617516
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Wilkinson, S., Hajibandeh, M., Remoy, H. Sustainable development. In: Noguchi M. (ed.) ZEMCH: Toward the Delivery of Zero Energy Mass Custom Homes. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, Springer, 2016, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31967-4_110.1007/978-3-319-31967-4_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Chen, C. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57, Issue 3, 2006, pp. 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2031710.1002/asi.20317
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Donovan, E. An evolution of sustainable aesthetics. Design to Thrive: PLEA 2017 Proceedings, 2017, pp. 208–215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Finocchiaro, L., Wago, I. S. Architectural design and aesthetics of Zero Emission Buildings: an analysis of perceived architectural qualities in the ZEB Living LAB in Trondheim. Design to Thrive: PLEA 2017 Proceedings, 2017, pp. 216–223.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Čeněk, M. Architecture: concept, form and aesthetics from the perspective of sustainability. CESB 2013 PRAGUE - Central Europe Towards Sustainable Building 2013: Sustainable Building and Refurbishment for Next Generations, 2013, pp. 523–526.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Gan, S., Zhang, H. The discussion of the concept of sustainable development of ecological architectural aesthetics. Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 598, 2012, pp. 8–11. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.598.810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.598.8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Dekay, M. Five levels of sustainable design aesthetics. Perceiving and appreciating developmental complexity. 28th International PLEA Conference on Sustainable Architecture + Urban Design: Opportunities, Limits and Needs - Towards an Environmentally Responsible Architecture proceeding, 2012, pp. 7–12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Bothwell, K. The architecture of the passively tempered environment. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 66–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Finocchicaro, L., Hestnes, A. G. Symbiosis and Mimesis in the Built Environment. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of Sustainable Architecture. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 2011, pp. 259 –271.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Hill, G. The aesthetics of architectural consumption. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 26 –40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Jauslin, D. Landscape aesthetics for sustainable architecture. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 109–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Knowles, R. L. Solar aesthetic. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 50–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Sauerbruch, M., Hutton, L. What does sustainability look like? In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 41–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Levit, R. Design’s new catechism. In: Preston, S. C., Naginski E. (eds.) The return to nature. Sustaining architecture in the face of sustainability. Routledge, 2014, pp. 9–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Sunikka-Blank, M. The concept and aesthetics of sustainable building in Japan. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 2011, pp. 186–197.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Spirn, A. The poetics of city and nature: towards a new aesthetic for urban design. Landscape Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 1988, pp. 108–126. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.7.2.10810.3368/lj.7.2.108
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Sheppard, S. R. J. Beyond visual resource management: emerging theories of an ecological aesthetic and visible stewardship. In: Sheppard, S.R.J., Harshaw, H. W. (eds.) Forests and landscapes– linking ecology, sustainablility, and aesthetics. New York, NY, CABI Publishing, 2001, pp. 149–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Hemmati, M. Aesthetics of sustainability. The relation of aesthetics and environmental sustainability. MFNZFR, Vol. 35, Special Issue: Art, Nature, City, 2016, pp. 82–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Di Carlo, I. The Aesthetics of Sustainability. Systemic thinking and self-organization in the evolution of cities. PhD thesis, University of Trento, IAAC, institute fro Advanced Architecture of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, The Bartlett, UCL, London, Uk, University of Innsbruck, Austria, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Di Carlo, I. Aesthetics as an adaptive system. An evolutionary approach on aesthetics and sustainable city design. In: I. Di Carlo (ed.), The Aesthetic of Sustainability, Monograph.it, 2013, pp. 376–377.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Marchand, A., Walker, S., De Coninck, P. The role of beauty for sustainability: a discussion on responsible consumption, aesthetics attitudes and product design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 99, 2006, pp. 371–380. https://doi.org/10.2495/RAV06037110.2495/RAV060371
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Kagan, S. Aesthetics of sustainability: a transdisciplinary sensibility for transformative practices. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, Vol. 2, 2011, pp. 65–73. https://doi.org/10.22545/2011/0001410.22545/2011/00014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Wines, J. Green Architecture. Koln: Taschen, 2000, 240 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Liu, Ch. Green architecture. Liaoning Science & Technology Pub., 2011, 272 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Jodidio, P. 100 contemporary green buildings. Vol. 1–2, Koln: Taschen, 2013, 696 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Helmke, J. Eco-visualization: aesthetics for sustainability. Urban Omnibus, 2013 [online, cited 02.07.2020]. https://urbanomnibus.net/2013/04/eco-visualization-aesthetics-for-sustainability/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Goodbun, J. Gregory Bateson’s critical cybernetics and ecological aesthetics of dwelling. Field, Vol. 4, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 35–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Štelbienė, A. Architektūros kokybė. Etika, estetika ir tapatybė. Architektūros kokybės kriterijai. Mokslo straipsniū rinkinys, 2015, pp. 28–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Kamicaityte-Virbasiene, J., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. Premises for development of sustainable architecture in urban environment. Town Planning and Architecture, Vol. 33, Issue 4, 2009, pp. 363–363.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. CIB, Conseil International du Bâtiment. Towards sustainable and smart-eco buildings. Summary report on the EU-funded project smart-ECO buildings in the EU, Rotterdam, 2010 [online, cited 03.03.2020]. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB18098.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Mačiulis, A. Šiuolaikinės Lietuvos architektūros meninės raiškos tendencijos. Vilnius: Technika. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Doctoral Thesis, 2013, 197 p.10.20334/2181-M
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Puglisi, L. P. New directions in contemporary architecture: evolutions and revolutions in building design since 1988. New Jersey, U.S.: Willey, 2008. 240 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Adrijauskas, A. Klasikinės Vakarū metafizinės estetikos ir meno filosofijos transformacijos: neklasikiniū principū sklaida. Estetikos ir meno filosofijos transformacijos / sudarytojas Antanas Andrijauskas, Vilnius: Kultūros, filosofijos ir meno institutas, 2005, pp. 12–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Heymann, D. An un-flushable urinal. Places Journal, June 2012. https://doi.org/10.22269/12060710.22269/120607
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Briggs, D. Aesthetic potentials in an open network inventory system. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of Sustainable Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 272–283.
]Search in Google Scholar