[ANTHONY, D. B. – HOWARD, J. B. 1976. Coal devolatilization and hydrogastification. In Journal of American Chemical Society, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 625–656.10.1002/aic.690220403]Search in Google Scholar
[BURNHAM, A. K. 2017. Introduction to chemical kinetics. In Global Chemical Kinetics of Fossil Fuels, pp. 25–74.10.1007/978-3-319-49634-4_2]Search in Google Scholar
[BURNHAM, A. K. 2014. Obtaining reliable phenomenological chemical kinetic models for real-world applications. In Thermochimica Acta, vol. 597, pp. 35–40.10.1016/j.tca.2014.10.006]Search in Google Scholar
[CAI, J. M. – Li, T. – LIU, R. A. 2007. A critical study of the Miura-Maki integral method for the estimation of the kinetic parameters of the distributed activation energy model. In Journal of Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, pp. 3894–3899.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.110]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A – SINGH, S. B. – ATSU, D. – DHAUNDIYAL, R. 2019. Application of Monte Carlo simulation for energy modelling. In Journal of American Chemical Society (Omega), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 4984–4990.10.1021/acsomega.8b03442]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A. – B. SINGH, S. 2018a. Mathematical insight to non-isothermal pyrolysis of pine needles for different probability distribution functions. In Biofuels, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 647–658.10.1080/17597269.2017.1329495]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A. – SINGH, S. B – HAMON, M. 2018b. Study of distributed activation energy model using bivariate distribution function, f (E1, E2). In Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 5, pp. 388–404.10.1016/j.tsep.2018.01.009]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A. – SINGH, S. B. 2017a. Asymptotic approximations to the isothermal pyrolysis of deodara leaves using gamma distribution. In Journal of Universitas Scientiarum, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 263–284.10.11144/Javeriana.SC22-3.aatt]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A. – SINGH, S. B. 2017b. Approximations to the non-isothermal distributed activation energy model for biomass pyrolysis using the Rayleigh distribution. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 20, no. 3, pp.78–84.10.1515/ata-2017-0016]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A. – TEWARI, P. 2017. Kinetic parameters for the thermal decomposition of forest waste using distributed activation energy model (DAEM). In Environmental and Climate Technologies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 15–32.10.1515/rtuect-2017-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[LI, Z. – LIU, C. – CHEN, Z. – QUAIN, J. – ZHAO, W. – ZHU, Q. 2009. Analysis of coals and biomass pyrolysis using the distributed activation energy model. In Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 948–952.10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.032]Search in Google Scholar
[MIURA, K. 1995. A new and simple method to estimate f(E) and ko(E) in the distributed activation energy model from three sets of experimental data. In Journal of Energy and Fuels, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 302–307.10.1021/ef00050a014]Search in Google Scholar
[YAN, J. H. – ZHU, H. M. – JIANG, X. G. – CHI, Y. – CEN, K. F. 2009. Analysis of volatile species kinetics during typical medical waste materials pyrolysis using a distributed activation energy model. In Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 162, no. 2–3, pp. 646–651.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.077]Search in Google Scholar