Quantification of flowability and hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.

1 Hamid H. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23:177–8. Search in Google Scholar

2 Lawson NC, Cakir D, Ramp L, Burgess JO. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23:171–6. Search in Google Scholar

3 Johnson GH, Lepe X, Aw TC. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:354–64. Search in Google Scholar

4 Al-Hassiny A, Végh D, Bányai D, Végh Á, Géczi Z, Borbély J, et al. User Experience of Intraoral Scanners in Dentistry: Transnational Questionnaire Study. Int Dent J. 2023;73:754–9. Search in Google Scholar

5 Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M, Sasamoto S, Iijima M, Mizoguchi I. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning. Dent Mater J. 2018;37:628–33. Search in Google Scholar

6 Afrashtehfar KI, Alnakeb NA, Assery MKM. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners Versus Traditional Impressions: a Rapid Umbrella Review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. Elsevier Inc.; 2022;22:1–8. Search in Google Scholar

7 Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2020;64:109–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010 Search in Google Scholar

8 Vitai V, Németh A, Sólyom E, Czumbel LM, Szabó B, Fazekas R, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of intraoral scanners for complete-arch scanning: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent. 2023;137. Search in Google Scholar

9 Balkenhol M, Wöstmann B, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. Shark fin test and impression quality: A correlation analysis. J Dent. 2007;35:409–15. Search in Google Scholar

10 Huettig F, Chekhani U, Klink A, Said F, Rupp F. A modified shark-fin test simulating the single-step/double-mix technique: A comparison of three groups of elastomers. Dent Mater J. 2018;37:414–21. Search in Google Scholar

11 Zielecka M. Methods of contact angle measurement as a tool for characterization of wettability of polymers. Polimery/Polymers. 2004;49:327–32. Search in Google Scholar

12 Huettig F, Klink A, Kohler A, Mutschler M, Rupp F. Flowability, tear strength, and hydrophilicity of current elastomers for dental impressions. Materials (Basel). 2021;14:1–16. Search in Google Scholar

13 German MJ, Carrick TE, McCabe JF. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties. Dent Mater. 2008;24:951–6. Search in Google Scholar

14 Kugel G, Klettke T, Goldberg JA, Benchimol J, Perry RD, Sharma S. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials. J Prosthodont. 2007;16:84–92. Search in Google Scholar

15 Hosseinpour D, Berg JC. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:292–300. Search in Google Scholar

16 Shergill DK, Chauhan A, Jugade S, Sakhare MD, Sagar N, Maurya V. Evaluation of Elastomeric Impres sion Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study. Pakistan Hear J. 2023;56:473–6. Search in Google Scholar

17 Menees TS, Radhakrishnan R, Ramp LC, Burgess JO, Lawson NC. Contact angle of unset elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:536–42. Search in Google Scholar