Orthodontist & Lecturer, Discipline of Orthodontics, Department of Family Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Orthodontist & Lecturer, Discipline of Orthodontics, Department of Family Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Public Health Specialist & Lecturer, Discipline of Dental Public Health, Department of Family Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKuala Lumpur, Malaysia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Campbell CL, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Qi R. Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132(6): 822–9.CampbellCLRobertsWEHartsfieldJKJrQiR.Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007; 132(6): 822–9.Search in Google Scholar
Arqub SA, Banankhah S, Sharma R, Da Cunha Godoy L, Kuo CL, Ahmed M, et al. Association between initial complexity, frequency of refinements, treatment duration, and outcome in Invisalign orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022; 162(3): e141–e155.ArqubSABanankhahSSharmaRDa Cunha GodoyLKuoCLAhmedMAssociation between initial complexity, frequency of refinements, treatment duration, and outcome in Invisalign orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2022; 162(3): e141–e155.Search in Google Scholar
Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14(2): 125–39.RichmondSShawWCO’BrienKDBuchananIBJonesRStephensCDThe development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod1992; 14(2): 125–39.Search in Google Scholar
Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod 2000; 27(2): 149–62.DanielsCRichmondS.The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod2000; 27(2): 149–62.Search in Google Scholar
Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114(5): 589–99.CaskoJSVadenJLKokichVGDamoneJJamesRDCangialosiTJ.Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1998; 114(5): 589–99.Search in Google Scholar
Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr, Dykhouse VJ, Moffitt AH, Grubb JE, et al. The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125(3): 270–8.CangialosiTJRioloMLOwensSEJrDykhouseVJMoffittAHGrubbJEThe ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2004; 125(3): 270–8.Search in Google Scholar
Vu CQ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Ofner S. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133(1): 9.e1–e13.VuCQRobertsWEHartsfieldJKJrOfnerS.Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2008; 133(1): 9.e1–e13.Search in Google Scholar
Demidenko E. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited. Stat Med 2007; 26(18): 3385–97.DemidenkoE.Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited. Stat Med2007; 26(18): 3385–97.Search in Google Scholar
Kinaan BK. Overjet and overbite distribution and correlation: a comparative epidemiological English-Iraqi study. Br J Orthod 1986; 13(2): 79–86.KinaanBK.Overjet and overbite distribution and correlation: a comparative epidemiological English-Iraqi study. Br J Orthod1986; 13(2): 79–86.Search in Google Scholar
Olliver SJ, Broadbent JM, Prasad S, Cai C, Thomson WM, Farella M. Changes in incisor relationship over the life course—findings from a cohort study. J Dent 2022; 117: 103919.OlliverSJBroadbentJMPrasadSCaiCThomsonWMFarellaM.Changes in incisor relationship over the life course—findings from a cohort study. J Dent2022; 117: 103919.Search in Google Scholar
Tervahauta E, Nokela J, Vuollo V, Pirttiniemi P, Silvola AS. Associations of sagittal malocclusions with dental arch characteristics and crowding in Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Orthod Craniofac Res 2022; 25(4): 468–75.TervahautaENokelaJVuolloVPirttiniemiPSilvolaAS.Associations of sagittal malocclusions with dental arch characteristics and crowding in Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Orthod Craniofac Res2022; 25(4): 468–75.Search in Google Scholar
Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO. Relationship between mandibular anterior crowding and lateral dentofacial morphology in the early mixed dentition. Angle Orthod 2004; 74(6): 759–64.TürkkahramanHSayinMO.Relationship between mandibular anterior crowding and lateral dentofacial morphology in the early mixed dentition. Angle Orthod2004; 74(6): 759–64.Search in Google Scholar
Shigenobu N, Hisano M, Shima S, Matsubara N, Soma K. Patterns of dental crowding in the lower arch and contributing factors. A statistical study. Angle Orthod 2007; 77(2): 303–10.ShigenobuNHisanoMShimaSMatsubaraNSomaK.Patterns of dental crowding in the lower arch and contributing factors. A statistical study. Angle Orthod2007; 77(2): 303–10.Search in Google Scholar
Janson G, Laranjeira V, Rizzo M, Garib D. Posterior tooth angulations in patients with anterior open bite and normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150(1): 71–7.JansonGLaranjeiraVRizzoMGaribD.Posterior tooth angulations in patients with anterior open bite and normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2016; 150(1): 71–7.Search in Google Scholar
Rijpstra C, Lisson JA. Etiology of anterior open bite: a review. J Orofac Orthop 2016; 77(4): 281–6.RijpstraCLissonJA.Etiology of anterior open bite: a review. J Orofac Orthop2016; 77(4): 281–6.Search in Google Scholar
Langberg BJ, Arai K, Miner RM. Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(1): 6–15; discussion 15-16LangbergBJAraiKMinerRM.Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2005; 127(1): 6–15; discussion 15-16Search in Google Scholar
Campos J, Campos M, Caetano PL, Kuchenbecker Rösing C, Farinazzo Vitral RW. The absence of proximal contact point on periodontal parameters of teeth moved into extraction sites. Braz Dent J 2022; 33(3): 74–81.CamposJCamposMCaetanoPLKuchenbecker RösingCFarinazzo VitralRW.The absence of proximal contact point on periodontal parameters of teeth moved into extraction sites. Braz Dent J2022; 33(3): 74–81.Search in Google Scholar
Zupancic S, Pohar M, Farcnik F, Ovsenik M. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30(3): 269–73.ZupancicSPoharMFarcnikFOvsenikM.Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships. Eur J Orthod2008; 30(3): 269–73.Search in Google Scholar
Yitschaky O, Neuhof MS, Yitschaky M, Zini A. Relationship between dental crowding and mandibular incisor proclination during orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent mandibular teeth. Angle Orthod 2016; 86(5): 727–33.YitschakyONeuhofMSYitschakyMZiniA.Relationship between dental crowding and mandibular incisor proclination during orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent mandibular teeth. Angle Orthod2016; 86(5): 727–33.Search in Google Scholar
Bouwens DG, Cevidanes L, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139(1): 126–32.BouwensDGCevidanesLLudlowJBPhillipsC.Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011; 139(1): 126–32.Search in Google Scholar
Alqareer A, Nada R, Ghayyath A, Baghdady M, Allareddy V. The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Med Imaging 2021; 21(1): 89.AlqareerANadaRGhayyathABaghdadyMAllareddyV.The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Med Imaging2021; 21(1): 89.Search in Google Scholar
Bilgiç F, Hamamci O, Başaran G. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Aust Orthod J 2011; 27(2): 110–6.BilgiçFHamamciOBaşaranG.Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Aust Orthod J2011; 27(2): 110–6.Search in Google Scholar
Madurantakam P. Fixed or removable function appliances for Class II malocclusions. Evid Based Dent 2016; 17(2): 52–3.MadurantakamP.Fixed or removable function appliances for Class II malocclusions. Evid Based Dent2016; 17(2): 52–3.Search in Google Scholar
Singh A, Sawant H, Khudare P, Rathod D, Gadhiya N, Narkhede S. A comparative study of skeletal and dental changes in fixed functional and removable functional appliance therapy. Saudi J Oral Dent Res 2020; 5(10): 519–21.SinghASawantHKhudarePRathodDGadhiyaNNarkhedeS.A comparative study of skeletal and dental changes in fixed functional and removable functional appliance therapy. Saudi J Oral Dent Res2020; 5(10): 519–21.Search in Google Scholar
Alfallaj H. Pre-prosthetic orthodontics. Saudi Dent J 2020; 32(1): 7–14.AlfallajH.Pre-prosthetic orthodontics. Saudi Dent J2020; 32(1): 7–14.Search in Google Scholar
Han S. The evaluation of treatment difficulty in orthognathic surgery. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 47(5): 339–40.HanS.The evaluation of treatment difficulty in orthognathic surgery. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg2021; 47(5): 339–40.Search in Google Scholar
Incorvati C, Gulotta C, Mirabile F, Badiali G, Marchetti C. Current trends in skeletal borderline patients: surgical versus orthodontic treatment decisions—what is the evidence? Appl Sci 2023; 12(9): 4636.IncorvatiCGulottaCMirabileFBadialiGMarchettiC.Current trends in skeletal borderline patients: surgical versus orthodontic treatment decisions—what is the evidence?Appl Sci2023; 12(9): 4636.Search in Google Scholar
Doughty F, Pillai S, Hamill D, Amin N, Martin PA. A service evaluation of the multidisciplinary team approach to hypodontia. Br Dent J 2023; 235(7): 514–9.DoughtyFPillaiSHamillDAminNMartinPA.A service evaluation of the multidisciplinary team approach to hypodontia. Br Dent J2023; 235(7): 514–9.Search in Google Scholar
Erbe C, Heger S, Kasaj A, Berres M, Wehrbein H. Orthodontic treatment in periodontally compromised patients: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2023; 27(1): 79–89.ErbeCHegerSKasajABerresMWehrbeinH.Orthodontic treatment in periodontally compromised patients: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig2023; 27(1): 79–89.Search in Google Scholar
Parashos P. Endodontic-orthodontic interactions: a review and treatment recommendations. Aust Dent J 2023; 68 (Suppl 1): S66–S81.ParashosP.Endodontic-orthodontic interactions: a review and treatment recommendations. Aust Dent J2023; 68 (Suppl 1): S66–S81.Search in Google Scholar
Ghiz MA, Ngan P, Gunel E. Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(3): 301–6.GhizMANganPGunelE.Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2005; 127(3): 301–6.Search in Google Scholar
Kim JC, Mascarenhas AK, Joo BH, Vig KW, Beck FM, Vig PS. Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118(6): 636–40.KimJCMascarenhasAKJooBHVigKWBeckFMVigPS.Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2000; 118(6): 636–40.Search in Google Scholar
Kongboonvijit T, Satrawaha S, Somboonsavatdee A. Factors influencing treatment outcomes assessed by the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). BMC Oral Health 2023; 23(1): 1000.KongboonvijitTSatrawahaSSomboonsavatdeeA.Factors influencing treatment outcomes assessed by the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). BMC Oral Health2023; 23(1): 1000.Search in Google Scholar
Patil GV, Lakhe P, Niranjane P. Maxillary expansion and Its effects on circummaxillary structures: a review. Cureus 2023; 15(1): e33755.PatilGVLakhePNiranjaneP.Maxillary expansion and Its effects on circummaxillary structures: a review. Cureus2023; 15(1): e33755.Search in Google Scholar
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126(5): 1763–8.SchoberPBoerCSchwarteLA.Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg2018; 126(5): 1763–8.Search in Google Scholar
Saini P, Maurya RJ, Singh H. Time-saving scoring chart for the American Board of Orthodontics’ objective grading system. APOS Trends Orthod 2020; 10(4): 262–5.SainiPMauryaRJSinghH.Time-saving scoring chart for the American Board of Orthodontics’ objective grading system. APOS Trends Orthod2020; 10(4): 262–5.Search in Google Scholar
