Accesso libero

The effect of post-ultraviolet light curing on the accuracy of direct-printed aligners: an in vitro study

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Figure 1.

Master maxillary .STL file after scanning.
Master maxillary .STL file after scanning.

Figure 2.

Aligners printed using a Form 3B printer.
Aligners printed using a Form 3B printer.

Figure 3.

Form Cure chamber for post-UV curing.
Form Cure chamber for post-UV curing.

Figure 4.

Aligner obtained after finishing and polishing.
Aligner obtained after finishing and polishing.

Figure 5.

Image generated by Geomagic Control software showing location-specific deviations at specific landmarks.
Image generated by Geomagic Control software showing location-specific deviations at specific landmarks.

Figure 6.

Graph showing a comparison of internal deviation within the group.
Graph showing a comparison of internal deviation within the group.

Figure 7.

Graph showing a comparison of composite deviation between the groups.
Graph showing a comparison of composite deviation between the groups.

Comparison of composite deviation between the groups for first observer (N = 30)

Landmark No cure 40 min cure 60 min cure p-value*
R1 -0.48 (0.65) -0.16 (0.33) -0.03 (0.16) 0.074
L1 -0.46 (0.67) -0.19 (0.21) -0.11 (0.13) 0.170
R3 -0.18 (0.36) -0.14 (0.1) -0.13 (0.13) 0.858
L3 -0.25 (0.54) -0.03 (0.1) -0.04 (0.22) 0.310
R6 -0.66 (0.54) -0.13 (0.05) -0.15 (0.17) 0.001**
L6 -0.21 (0.8) -0.05 (0.17) -0.03 (0.13) 0.665
FR1 -0.08 (0.4) 0.07 (0.13) 0.12 (0.07) 0.159
FL1 -0.11 (0.32) 0.15 (0.03) 0.18 (0.05) 0.002**
R7 -0.38 (0.52) -0.09 (0.13) -0.09 (0.18) 0.091
L7 -0.73 (0.74) -0.13 (0.08) -0.02 (0.12) 0.003**

Intra-class correlation coefficient between the two observers across the three groups (N = 30)

Group Landmark Intra-class correlation coefficient (95% CI) Percentage with <0.10 mm difference p-value
No cure R1 0.265 (-0.401–0.748) 50% 0.215
L1 -0.121 (-0.674–0.519) 50% 0.639
R3 0.671 (0.115–0.906) 90% 0.012
L3 0.953 (0.821–0.987) 90% <0.001
R6 0.742 (0.253–0.929) 90% 0.004
L6 0.491 (-0.157–0.843) 50% 0.062
FR1 0.518 (-0.122–0.853) 70% 0.051
FL1 0.079 (-0.549–0.65) 80% 0.409
R7 0.958 (0.841–0.989) 70% <0.001
L7 0.755 (0.28–0.932) 80% 0.004
40 min cure R1 0.045 (-0.573–0.630) 70% 0.448
L1 0.454 (-0.204–0.829) 80% 0.080
R3 0.802 (0.385–0.946) 80% 0.002
L3 0.327 (-0.342–0.776) 90% 0.163
R6 0.445 (-0.214–0.825) 80% 0.085
L6 0.688 (0.147–0.912) 90% 0.010
FR1 0.821 (0.432–0.952) 100% 0.001
FL1 0.393 (-0.274–0.804) 90% 0.116
R7 0.926 (0.732–0.981) 100% <0.001
L7 0.524 (-0.114–0.855) 80% 0.049
60 min cure R1 0.079 (-0.549–0.650) 70% 0.409
L1 0.282 (-0.385–0.756) 90% 0.200
R3 0.44 (-0.22–0.823) 100% 0.088
L3 0.758 (0.286–0.933) 80% 0.003
R6 0.528 (-0.108–0.857) 90% 0.047
L6 -0.023 (-0.616–0.587) 80% 0.527
FR1 0.857 (0.526–0.962) 90% <0.001
FL1 0.843 (0.49–0.958) 90% 0.001
R7 0.823 (0.438–0.952) 80% 0.001
L7 0.768 (0.307–0.936) 90% 0.003

Comparison of internal deviation within the group for first observer (N = 30)

Group Landmark Mean ± SD p-value*
No cure R1 -0.48 (0.65) 0.140
L1 -0.46 (0.67)
R3 -0.18 (0.36)
L3 -0.25 (0.54)
R6 -0.66 (0.54)
L6 -0.21 (0.8)
FR1 -0.08 (0.4)
FL1 -0.11 (0.32)
R7 -0.38 (0.52)
L7 -0.73 (0.74)
40 min cure R1 -0.16 (0.33) 0.006
L1 -0.19 (0.21)
R3 -0.14 (0.1)
L3** -0.03 (0.1)
R6 -0.13 (0.05)
L6 -0.05 (0.17)
FR1 0.07 (0.13)
FL1 0.15 (0.03)
R7 -0.09 (0.13)
L7 -0.13 (0.08)
60 min cure R1** -0.03 (0.16) <0.001
L1 -0.11 (0.13)
R3 -0.13 (0.13)
L3** -0.04 (0.22)
R6 -0.15 (0.17)
L6** -0.03 (0.13)
FR1 0.12 (0.07)
FL1 0.18 (0.05)
R7 -0.09 (0.18)
L7** -0.02 (0.12)

Post hoc analysis

Landmark No cure vs 40 min cure No cure vs 60 min cure 40 min cure vs 60 min cure
R1 0.249 0.067 0.762
L1 0.333 0.172 0.913
R3 0.910 0.859 0.993
L3 0.365 0.393 0.998
R6 0.004 0.004 0.997
L6 0.734 0.695 0.998
FR1 0.340 0.156 0.882
FL1 0.009 0.004 0.948
R7 0.133 0.139 1.000
L7 0.014 0.004 0.848
eISSN:
2207-7480
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other