This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Kalaitzoglou ME, Lambrianidis T. Understanding root fenestration: a systematic scoping review of prevalence and clinical factors. Aust Endod J. 2023; 49:428–43.KalaitzoglouMELambrianidisT.Understanding root fenestration: a systematic scoping review of prevalence and clinical factors.Aust Endod J.2023;49:428–43.Search in Google Scholar
Guo Z, Zhang R, Guo C, Li X, Jin Z, Liu Q. A retrospective study of alveolar bone remodelling after anterior retraction in orthodontic tooth extraction cases with clear aligners and fixed appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023. [Epub ahead of print]GuoZZhangRGuoCLiXJinZLiuQ.A retrospective study of alveolar bone remodelling after anterior retraction in orthodontic tooth extraction cases with clear aligners and fixed appliances.Orthod Craniofac Res.2023. [Epub ahead of print]Search in Google Scholar
Jin SH, Park JB, Kim N, Park S, Kim KJ, Kim Y. Analysis of alveolar bone morphology of the maxillary central and lateral incisors with normal occlusion. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012; 42:173–8.JinSHParkJBKimNParkSKimKJKimY.Analysis of alveolar bone morphology of the maxillary central and lateral incisors with normal occlusion.J Periodontal Implant Sci.2012;42:173–8.Search in Google Scholar
Lee JE, Jung CY, Kim Y, Kook YA, Ko Y, Park JB. Analysis of alveolar bone morphology of the maxillary central and lateral incisors with normal occlusion. Med Kaunas Lith. 2019; 55:565.LeeJEJungCYKimYKookYAKoYParkJB.Analysis of alveolar bone morphology of the maxillary central and lateral incisors with normal occlusion.Med Kaunas Lith.2019;55:565.Search in Google Scholar
Lee JE, Lee YJ, Jin SH, Kim Y, Kook YA, Ko Y. Topographic analysis of the mandibular symphysis in a normal occlusion population using cone-beam computed tomography. Exp Ther Med. 2015; 10:2150–6.LeeJELeeYJJinSHKimYKookYAKoY.Topographic analysis of the mandibular symphysis in a normal occlusion population using cone-beam computed tomography.Exp Ther Med.2015;10:2150–6.Search in Google Scholar
Park JB, Lee JE, Kim K, Yoo JT, Kim Y, Kook YA. The thickness of alveolar bone at the mandibular canine and premolar teeth in normal occlusion. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25:1115–9.ParkJBLeeJEKimKYooJTKimYKookYA.The thickness of alveolar bone at the mandibular canine and premolar teeth in normal occlusion.J Craniofac Surg.2014;25:1115–9.Search in Google Scholar
Tao R, Niu L. Investigation of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary alveolar bone: a cone-beam CT study in 300 cases with normal occlusion. Chin J Stomatol, 2017; 52:631–6.TaoRNiuL.Investigation of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary alveolar bone: a cone-beam CT study in 300 cases with normal occlusion.Chin J Stomatol,2017;52:631–6.Search in Google Scholar
Han M, Wang R yang, Liu H, Zhu X juan, Wei F lan, Lv T. Association between mandibular posterior alveolar morphology and growth pattern in a Chinese population with normal occlusion. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013; 14:25–32.HanMWangR yangLiuHZhuX juanWeiF lanLvT.Association between mandibular posterior alveolar morphology and growth pattern in a Chinese population with normal occlusion.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B.2013;14:25–32.Search in Google Scholar
Srebrzynska-Witek A, Koszowski R, Różyło-Kalinowska I. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22:1567–78.Srebrzynska-WitekAKoszowskiRRóżyło-KalinowskaI.Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study.Clin Oral Investig.2018;22:1567–78.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider S, Gandhi V, Upadhyay M, Allareddy V, Tadinada A, Yadav S. Sex-, growth pattern-, and growth status-related variability in maxillary and mandibular buccal cortical thickness and density. Korean J Orthod. 2020; 50:108–19.SchneiderSGandhiVUpadhyayMAllareddyVTadinadaAYadavS.Sex-, growth pattern-, and growth status-related variability in maxillary and mandibular buccal cortical thickness and density.Korean J Orthod.2020;50:108–19.Search in Google Scholar
Baysal A, Ucar FI, Buyuk SK, Ozer T, Uysal T. Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2013; 43:134–40.BaysalAUcarFIBuyukSKOzerTUysalT.Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.Korean J Orthod.2013;43:134–40.Search in Google Scholar
Lee S, Hwang S, Jang W, Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Assessment of lower incisor alveolar bone width using cone-beam computed tomography images in skeletal Class III adults of different vertical patterns. Korean J Orthod. 2018; 48:349–56.LeeSHwangSJangWChoiYJChungCJKimKH.Assessment of lower incisor alveolar bone width using cone-beam computed tomography images in skeletal Class III adults of different vertical patterns.Korean J Orthod.2018;48:349–56.Search in Google Scholar
Hourfar J, Bister D, Lisson JA, Goldbecher C, Ludwig B. Vestibulo-Oral inclination of maxillary and mandibular canines and bicuspids - a CBCT investigation. Head Face Med. 2016; 12:22.HourfarJBisterDLissonJAGoldbecherCLudwigB.Vestibulo-Oral inclination of maxillary and mandibular canines and bicuspids - a CBCT investigation.Head Face Med.2016;12:22.Search in Google Scholar
Sadek MM, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Three-dimensional mapping of cortical bone thickness in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions. Prog Orthod. 2016; 17:32.SadekMMSabetNEHassanIT.Three-dimensional mapping of cortical bone thickness in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions.Prog Orthod.2016;17:32.Search in Google Scholar
Chen Y, Dai Y, Yan Z, You Y, Wu B, Lu B. Morphological analysis of anterior permanent dentition in a Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography. Head Face Med. 2023; 19:12.ChenYDaiYYanZYouYWuBLuB.Morphological analysis of anterior permanent dentition in a Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography.Head Face Med.2023;19:12.Search in Google Scholar
Sendyk M, de Paiva JB, Abrão J, Rino Neto J. Correlation between buccolingual tooth inclination and alveolar bone thickness in subjects with Class III dentofacial deformities. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017; 152:66–79.SendykMde PaivaJBAbrãoJRino NetoJ.Correlation between buccolingual tooth inclination and alveolar bone thickness in subjects with Class III dentofacial deformities.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.2017;152:66–79.Search in Google Scholar
Dalaie K, Hajimiresmail YS, Safi Y, Baghban AA, Behnaz M, Rafsanjan KT. Correlation of alveolar bone thickness and central incisor inclination in skeletal Class I and II malocclusions with different vertical skeletal patterns: A CBCT study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023; 164:537–44.DalaieKHajimiresmailYSSafiYBaghbanAABehnazMRafsanjanKT.Correlation of alveolar bone thickness and central incisor inclination in skeletal Class I and II malocclusions with different vertical skeletal patterns: A CBCT study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2023;164:537–44.Search in Google Scholar
Sadek MM, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions. Eur J Orthod. 2015; 37:194–201.SadekMMSabetNEHassanIT.Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions.Eur J Orthod.2015;37:194–201.Search in Google Scholar
Casanova-Sarmiento JA, Arriola-Guillén LE, Ruíz-Mora GA, Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA, Aliaga-Del Castillo A. Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: a CBCT Study. Int Orthod. 2020;18:79–88.Casanova-SarmientoJAArriola-GuillénLERuíz-MoraGARodríguez-CárdenasYAAliaga-Del CastilloA.Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: a CBCT Study.Int Orthod.2020;18:79–88.Search in Google Scholar
Dong F, Huan J, Zhiyong L. Evaluation of the accuracy of alveolar bone height measurement in vitro by cone beam computed tomography. West China J Stomatol. 2012; 30: 603.DongFHuanJZhiyongL.Evaluation of the accuracy of alveolar bone height measurement in vitro by cone beam computed tomography.West China J Stomatol.2012;30:603.Search in Google Scholar
Klinge A, Al-Okshi A, Becktor J, Lindh C. A rater agreement study on measurements in cross-sectional CBCT images exploring the association between alveolar bone morphology and craniofacial height. Oral Radiol. 2021; 37:573–84.KlingeAAl-OkshiABecktorJLindhC.A rater agreement study on measurements in cross-sectional CBCT images exploring the association between alveolar bone morphology and craniofacial height.Oral Radiol.2021;37:573–84.Search in Google Scholar
Chen J, Bai D. Research progress on root position measurement methods in orthodontic treatment using cone beam CT. J Prevention Treatment Stomatol Dis. 2022; 30:740–5.ChenJBaiD.Research progress on root position measurement methods in orthodontic treatment using cone beam CT.J Prevention Treatment Stomatol Dis.2022;30:740–5.Search in Google Scholar
Pei J, Jin Z. A study of alveolar bone structure around incisors in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary protrusion. J Pract Stomatol. 2013; 29:398–402.PeiJJinZ.A study of alveolar bone structure around incisors in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary protrusion.J Pract Stomatol.2013;29:398–402.Search in Google Scholar
Yamada C, Kitai N, Kakimoto N, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Takada K. Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77:766–72.YamadaCKitaiNKakimotoNMurakamiSFurukawaSTakadaK.Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism.Angle Orthod.2007;77:766–72.Search in Google Scholar
Guerino P, Marquezan M, Mezomo MB, Antunes KT, Grehs RA, Ferrazzo VA. Tomographic evaluation of the lower incisor’s bone limits in mandibular symphysis of orthodontically untreated adults. BioMed Res Int. 2017; 2017:9103749.GuerinoPMarquezanMMezomoMBAntunesKTGrehsRAFerrazzoVA.Tomographic evaluation of the lower incisor’s bone limits in mandibular symphysis of orthodontically untreated adults.BioMed Res Int.2017;2017:9103749.Search in Google Scholar
Ricketts RM. Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs: I. Am J Orthod. 1976; 70:241–68.RickettsRM.Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs: I.Am J Orthod.1976;70:241–68.Search in Google Scholar
Chen Y. Theory and application of cortical anchorage. Chin J Stomatol. 1993; 28:379–81.ChenY.Theory and application of cortical anchorage.Chin J Stomatol.1993;28:379–81.Search in Google Scholar
Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med. 2006; 25:127–41.RoystonPAltmanDGSauerbreiW.Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea.Stat Med.2006;25:127–41.Search in Google Scholar
Gaffuri F, Cossellu G, Maspero C, Lanteri V, Ugolini A, Rasperini G. Correlation between facial growth patterns and cortical bone thickness assessed with cone-beam computed tomography in young adult untreated patients. Saudi Dent. J. 2021; 33:161–7.GaffuriFCosselluGMasperoCLanteriVUgoliniARasperiniG.Correlation between facial growth patterns and cortical bone thickness assessed with cone-beam computed tomography in young adult untreated patients.Saudi Dent. J.2021;33:161–7.Search in Google Scholar
Jo AR, Mo SS, Lee KJ, Sung SJ, Chun YS. Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition. Korean J Orthod. 2017; 47:21–30.JoARMoSSLeeKJSungSJChunYS.Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition.Korean J Orthod.2017;47:21–30.Search in Google Scholar
Oh MB, Mo SS, Hwang CJ, Chung C, Kang JM, Lee KJ. The 3-dimensional zone of the center of resistance of the mandibular posterior teeth segment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156:365–74.OhMBMoSSHwangCJChungCKangJMLeeKJ.The 3-dimensional zone of the center of resistance of the mandibular posterior teeth segment.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2019;156:365–74.Search in Google Scholar
Luu B, Cronauer EA, Gandhi V, Kaplan J, Pierce DM, Upadhyay M. A finite element approach for locating the center of resistance of maxillary teeth. J Vis Exp. 2020;158:e60746.LuuBCronauerEAGandhiVKaplanJPierceDMUpadhyayM.A finite element approach for locating the center of resistance of maxillary teeth.J Vis Exp.2020;158:e60746.Search in Google Scholar
Li B, Li J, Wang H, Xie X, Wen J, Li H. Relationship between different skeletal facial types and anterior alveolar bone thickness with cone-beam computed tomography in an Asian population. Ann Trans Med. 2022;10:956.LiBLiJWangHXieXWenJLiH.Relationship between different skeletal facial types and anterior alveolar bone thickness with cone-beam computed tomography in an Asian population.Ann Trans Med.2022;10:956.Search in Google Scholar
Patcas R, Müller L, Ullrich O, Peltomäki T. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012; 141:41–50.PatcasRMüllerLUllrichOPeltomäkiT.Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.2012;141:41–50.Search in Google Scholar
Özer SY. Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model. J Endod. 2011; 37:75–9.ÖzerSY.Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model.J Endod.2011;37:75–9.Search in Google Scholar
Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJR, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137:16.e1–6.DamstraJFourieZHuddleston SlaterJJRRenY.Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2010;137:16.e1–6.Search in Google Scholar
Liedke GS, da Silveira HED, da Silveira HLD, Dutra V, de Figueiredo JAP. Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod. 2009; 35:233–5.LiedkeGSda SilveiraHEDda SilveiraHLDDutraVde FigueiredoJAP.Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption.J Endod.2009;35:233–5.Search in Google Scholar
Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging. 2013; 26:813–20.Spin-NetoRGotfredsenEWenzelA.Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review.J Digit Imaging.2013;26:813–20.Search in Google Scholar
