This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Stefanovic NL, Uhac M, Brumini M, Zigante M, Perkovic V, Spalj S. Predictors of patient compliance during Class II division 1 malocclusion functional orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2021; 91:502–8.StefanovicNLUhacMBruminiMZiganteMPerkovicVSpaljSPredictors of patient compliance during Class II division 1 malocclusion functional orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod2021; 91:502–8.Search in Google Scholar
Li P, Feng J, Shen G, Zhao N. Severe Class II Division 1 malocclusion in an adolescent patient, treated with a novel sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150:153–66.LiPFengJShenGZhaoNSevere Class II Division 1 malocclusion in an adolescent patient, treated with a novel sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2016; 150:153–66.Search in Google Scholar
Raposo R, Peleteiro B, Paco M, Pinho T. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 47:445–55.RaposoRPeleteiroBPacoMPinhoTOrthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2018; 47:445–55.Search in Google Scholar
Lee KY, Park JH, Tai K, Chae JM. Treatment with Twin-block appliance followed by fixed appliance therapy in a growing Class II patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150:847–63.LeeKYParkJHTaiKChaeJMTreatment with Twin-block appliance followed by fixed appliance therapy in a growing Class II patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2016; 150:847–63.Search in Google Scholar
Clark WJ. The Twin Block technique. Part 1. Funct Orthod 1992; 9:32–4, 36–37.ClarkWJThe Twin Block technique. Part 1. Funct Orthod1992; 9:32–4, 36–37.Search in Google Scholar
DiBiase AT, Cobourne MT, Lee RT. The use of functional appliances in contemporary orthodontic practice. Br Dent J 2015;218:123–8.DiBiaseATCobourneMTLeeRTThe use of functional appliances in contemporary orthodontic practice. Br Dent J2015; 218:123–8.Search in Google Scholar
Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:599 e591-512; discussion e591-596.CozzaPBaccettiTFranchiLDe ToffolLMcNamaraJAJr.Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2006; 129:599 e591-512; discussion e591-596.Search in Google Scholar
Bender M, Lipin R, Goudy S. Development of the Pediatric Temporomandibular Joint. ■ 2018;30:1–9.BenderMLipinRGoudySDevelopment of the Pediatric Temporomandibular Joint. ■2018; 30:1–9.Search in Google Scholar
Marsico E, Gatto E, Burrascano M, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term. ■ 2011;139:24–36.MarsicoEGattoEBurrascanoMMatareseGCordascoGEffectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term. ■2011; 139:24–36.Search in Google Scholar
Souki B, Vilefort P, Oliveira D, Andrade I, Ruellas A, Yatabe M et al. Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment. ■ 2017;20:111–8.SoukiBVilefortPOliveiraDAndradeIRuellasAYatabeMThree-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment. ■2017; 20:111–8.Search in Google Scholar
Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, Masucci C, Defraia E, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance vs the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in growing Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2015;85:784–9.GiuntiniVVangelistiAMasucciCDefraiaEMcNamaraJAJrFranchiLTreatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance vs the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in growing Class II patients. Angle Orthod2015; 85:784–9.Search in Google Scholar
Mohamed RN, Basha S, Al-Thomali Y. Changes in upper airway dimensions following orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with twin block appliance: a systematic review. Turk J Orthod 2020;33:59–64.MohamedRNBashaSAl-ThomaliYChanges in upper airway dimensions following orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with twin block appliance: a systematic review. Turk J Orthod2020; 33:59–64.Search in Google Scholar
Yaqoob O, Dibiase AT, Fleming PS, Cobourne MT. Use of the Clark Twin Block functional appliance with and without an upper labial bow: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod 2012;82:363–9.YaqoobODibiaseATFlemingPSCobourneMTUse of the Clark Twin Block functional appliance with and without an upper labial bow: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod2012; 82:363–9.Search in Google Scholar
Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:335–40.FranchiLBaccettiTMcNamaraJAMandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2000; 118:335–40.Search in Google Scholar
Clark W. Design and management of Twin Blocks: reflections after 30 years of clinical use. J Orthod 2010;37:209–16.ClarkWDesign and management of Twin Blocks: reflections after 30 years of clinical use. J Orthod2010; 37:209–16.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Appelbe P, Davies L, Connolly I, et al. Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:573–9.O’BrienKWrightJConboyFAppelbePDaviesLConnollyIEarly treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2009; 135:573–9.Search in Google Scholar
Alshahrani I, Kamran M, Alhaizaey A, Abumelha NJ. Evaluation of skeletal variations and establishment of Cephalometric Norms in Saudi Sub Population using Bjork Jarabak’s analysis. ■ 2018;34:1104–9.AlshahraniIKamranMAlhaizaeyAAbumelhaNJEvaluation of skeletal variations and establishment of Cephalometric Norms in Saudi Sub Population using Bjork Jarabak’s analysis. ■2018; 34:1104–9.Search in Google Scholar
Amasyali M, Sabuncuoglu FA, Karacay S, Dogru M, Altug H. Combined use of retraction and torque arch with mini-screws: a cephalometric study. Turk J Orthod 2018;31:1–6.AmasyaliMSabuncuogluFAKaracaySDogruMAltugHCombined use of retraction and torque arch with mini-screws: a cephalometric study. Turk J Orthod2018; 31:1–6.Search in Google Scholar
Mao H, Yang A, Pan Y, Li H, Lei L. Displacement in root apex and changes in incisor inclination affect alveolar bone remodeling in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients: a retrospective study. Head Face Med 2020;16:29.MaoHYangAPanYLiHLeiLDisplacement in root apex and changes in incisor inclination affect alveolar bone remodeling in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients: a retrospective study. Head Face Med2020; 16:29.Search in Google Scholar
Domingo-Clerigues M, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM, Garcia-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcis C. Changes in the alveolar bone thickness of maxillary incisors after orthodontic treatment involving extractions—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e76–e84.Domingo-CleriguesMMontiel-CompanyJMAlmerich-SillaJMGarcia-SanzVParedes-GallardoVBellot-ArcisCChanges in the alveolar bone thickness of maxillary incisors after orthodontic treatment involving extractions—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent2019; 11:e76–e84.Search in Google Scholar
Baek E, Hwang S, Kim K, Chung CJ. Total intrusion and distalization of the maxillary arch to improve smile esthetics. ■ 2017;47:59–73.BaekEHwangSKimKChungCJTotal intrusion and distalization of the maxillary arch to improve smile esthetics. ■2017; 47:59–73.Search in Google Scholar
Alshammery D, Alqhtani N, Alajmi A, Dagriri L, Alrukban N, Alshahrani R, et al. Non-surgical correction of gummy smile using temporary skeletal mini-screw anchorage devices: a systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent 2021;13:e717–e723.AlshammeryDAlqhtaniNAlajmiADagririLAlrukbanNAlshahraniRNon-surgical correction of gummy smile using temporary skeletal mini-screw anchorage devices: a systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent2021; 13:e717–e723.Search in Google Scholar
Bariani R, Bigliazzi R, Cappellette Junior M, Moreira G, Fujita R. Effectiveness of functional orthodontic appliances in obstructive sleep apnea treatment in children: literature review. ■ 2022;88:263–78.BarianiRBigliazziRCappellette JuniorMMoreiraGFujitaREffectiveness of functional orthodontic appliances in obstructive sleep apnea treatment in children: literature review. ■2022; 88:263–78.Search in Google Scholar
Kothekar A, Vallur S. Adenoid hypertrophy and endoscopic adenoidectomy in adults: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;74:1067–72.KothekarAVallurSAdenoid hypertrophy and endoscopic adenoidectomy in adults: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2022; 74:1067–72.Search in Google Scholar
Zawawi K, Melis M. The role of mandibular third molars on lower anterior teeth crowding and relapse after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. ■ 2014;2014:615429.ZawawiKMelisMThe role of mandibular third molars on lower anterior teeth crowding and relapse after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. ■2014; 2014:615429.Search in Google Scholar
