This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biadsee A, Rosner O, Khalil C, Atanasova V, Blushtein J, Levartovsky S. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally-printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial aging. Korean J Orthod. 2023;53(1):45–53.BiadseeARosnerOKhalilCAtanasovaVBlushteinJLevartovskyS.Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally-printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial aging. Korean J Orthod. 2023;53(1):45–53.Search in Google Scholar
Şenyürek SA, Ajami S, Ruggiero F, Van de Lande L, Caron CJJM, Schievano S, Dunaway DJ, Padwa B, et al. The accuracy of computer-assisted surgical planning in predicting soft tissue responses after Le Fort I osteotomy: retrospective analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(1):131–8.ŞenyürekSAAjamiSRuggieroFVan de LandeLCaronCJJMSchievanoSDunawayDJPadwaBThe accuracy of computer-assisted surgical planning in predicting soft tissue responses after Le Fort I osteotomy: retrospective analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(1):131–8.Search in Google Scholar
Cattaneo PM, Cornelıs MA. Digital workflows in orthodontic postgraduate training. Semin Orthod. 2023;29(1): 4–10.CattaneoPMCornelısMA.Digital workflows in orthodontic postgraduate training. Semin Orthod. 2023;29(1):4–10.Search in Google Scholar
Camardella LT, Rothier EK, Vilella OV, Ongkosuwito EM, Breuning KH. Virtual setup: application in orthodontic practice. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77(6):409–19.CamardellaLTRothierEKVilellaOVOngkosuwitoEMBreuningKH.Virtual setup: application in orthodontic practice. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77(6):409–19.Search in Google Scholar
Yang L, Yin G, Liao X, Yin X, Ye N. A novel customized ceramic bracket for esthetic orthodontics: in vitro study. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):39.YangLYinGLiaoXYinXYeN.A novel customized ceramic bracket for esthetic orthodontics: in vitro study. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):39.Search in Google Scholar
Galante R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: a review. Dent Mater. 2019;35(6):825–46.GalanteRFigueiredo-PinaCGSerroAP.Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: a review. Dent Mater. 2019;35(6):825–46.Search in Google Scholar
Papageorgiou SN, Polychronis G, Panayi N, Zinelis S, Eliades T. New aesthetic in-house 3D-printed brackets: proof of concept and fundamental mechanical properties. Prog Orthod. 2022;23(1):6.PapageorgiouSNPolychronisGPanayiNZinelisSEliadesT.New aesthetic in-house 3D-printed brackets: proof of concept and fundamental mechanical properties. Prog Orthod. 2022;23(1):6.Search in Google Scholar
Articolo LC, Kusy K, Saunders CR, Kusy RP. Influence of ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the notching of archwires during clinical treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22(4):409–25.ArticoloLCKusyKSaundersCRKusyRP.Influence of ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the notching of archwires during clinical treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22(4):409–25.Search in Google Scholar
Shafiei F, Sardarian A, Fekrazad R, Farjood A. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a universal adhesive using different etching methods. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019;24(4):33.e1–8.ShafieiFSardarianAFekrazadRFarjoodA.Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a universal adhesive using different etching methods. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019;24(4):33.e1–8.Search in Google Scholar
Nguyen T, Jackson T. 3D technologies for precision in orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2018;24:386–92.NguyenTJacksonT.3D technologies for precision in orthodontics. Semin Orthod2018;24:386–92.Search in Google Scholar
Kitahara-Céia FM, Mucha JN, Marques dos Santos PA. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):548–55.Kitahara-CéiaFMMuchaJNMarques dos SantosPA.Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):548–55.Search in Google Scholar
Jungbauer R, Hammer CM, Edelhoff D, Proff P, Stawarczyk B. Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded brackets using CAD/CAM transfer trays to monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater. 2023;39(2):170–80.JungbauerRHammerCMEdelhoffDProffPStawarczykB.Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded brackets using CAD/CAM transfer trays to monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater. 2023;39(2):170–80.Search in Google Scholar
Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333–40.ArtunJBerglandS.Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333–40.Search in Google Scholar
Yang L, Yin G, Liao X, Yin X, Ye N. A novel customized ceramic bracket for esthetic orthodontics: in vitro study. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):39.YangLYinGLiaoXYinXYeN.A novel customized ceramic bracket for esthetic orthodontics: in vitro study. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):39.Search in Google Scholar
Hodecker L, Bourauel C, Braumann B, Kruse T, Christ H, Scharf S. Comparative in vitro analysis of the sliding resistance of a modern 3D-printed polymer bracket in combination with different archwire types. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(5):4049–57.HodeckerLBourauelCBraumannBKruseTChristHScharfS.Comparative in vitro analysis of the sliding resistance of a modern 3D-printed polymer bracket in combination with different archwire types. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(5):4049–57.Search in Google Scholar
Krey K-F, Darkazanly N, Kühnert R, Ruge S. 3D-printed orthodontic brackets - proof of concept. Int J Comput Dent. 2016;19:351–62.KreyK-FDarkazanlyNKühnertRRugeS.3D-printed orthodontic brackets - proof of concept. Int J Comput Dent. 2016;19:351–62.Search in Google Scholar
Panayi NC. In-house customization of lingual orthodontic brackets using Ubrackets computer-aided design orthodontic software. AJO-DO Clinical Companion. 2022;2(4):325–34.PanayiNC.In-house customization of lingual orthodontic brackets using Ubrackets computer-aided design orthodontic software. AJO-DO Clinical Companion. 2022;2(4):325–34.Search in Google Scholar
Fotovat F, Shishehian A, Alijani S, Alafchi B, Parchami P. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic stainless-steel brackets on temporary crowns fabricated by three different methods: An in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2022;20(2):100641.FotovatFShishehianAAlijaniSAlafchiBParchamiP.Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic stainless-steel brackets on temporary crowns fabricated by three different methods: An in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2022;20(2):10641.Search in Google Scholar
Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Invest 2012;16(6):1669–77.StawarczykBEnderATrottmannAÖzcanMFischerJHämmerleCH.Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Invest2012;16(6):1669–77.Search in Google Scholar
van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):3–12.van NoortR.The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):3–12.Search in Google Scholar
Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):54–64.StansburyJWIdacavageMJ.3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):54–64.Search in Google Scholar
Prylińska-Czyżewska A, Maciejewska-Szaniec Z, Olszewska A, Polichnowska M, Grabarek BO, Dudek D, et al. Comparison of bond strength of orthodontic brackets onto the tooth enamel of 120 freshly extracted adult bovine medial lower incisors using 4 adhesives: a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive, a composite adhesive, a liquid composite adhesive, and a one-step light-cured adhesive. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e938867.Prylińska-CzyżewskaAMaciejewska-SzaniecZOlszewskaAPolichnowskaMGrabarekBODudekDComparison of bond strength of orthodontic brackets onto the tooth enamel of 120 freshly extracted adult bovine medial lower incisors using 4 adhesives: a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive, a composite adhesive, a liquid composite adhesive, and a one-step light-cured adhesive. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e938867.Search in Google Scholar
Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171–8.ReynoldsIR.A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod1975;2:171–8.Search in Google Scholar
Lai PY, Woods MG, Tyas MJ. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces. Aust Orthod J. 1999;15:235–45.LaiPYWoodsMGTyasMJ.Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces. Aust Orthod J. 1999;15:235–45.Search in Google Scholar
Yassaei S, Davari A, Goldani Moghadam M, Kamaei A. Comparison of shear bond strength of RMGI and composite resin for orthodontic bracket bonding. J Dent Tehran Iran. 2014;11(3):282–9.YassaeiSDavariAGoldani MoghadamMKamaeiA.Comparison of shear bond strength of RMGI and composite resin for orthodontic bracket bonding. J Dent Tehran Iran. 2014;11(3):282–9.Search in Google Scholar
Veli I, Akin M, Baka ZM, Uysal T. Effects of different pre-treatment methods on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to demineralized enamel. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(1):7–13.VeliIAkinMBakaZMUysalT.Effects of different pre-treatment methods on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to demineralized enamel. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(1):7–13.Search in Google Scholar
Tahmasbi S, Badiee M, Modarresi M. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Composite Restorations Using Universal Adhesive. J Dent (Shiraz). 2019;20(2):75–82.TahmasbiSBadieeMModarresiM.Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Composite Restorations Using Universal Adhesive. J Dent (Shiraz). 2019;20(2):75–82.Search in Google Scholar
