This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
D’Angelo M, Zanza A, Bhandi S, Miccoli G, Cicconetti A. An update of possible radiation-free imaging techniques in dentistry. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021; 22(9):973–4.D’AngeloMZanzaABhandiSMiccoliGCicconettiA.An update of possible radiation-free imaging techniques in dentistry.J Contemp Dent Pract.2021;22(9):973–4.Search in Google Scholar
Park CS, Park JK, Kim H, Han SS, Jeong HG, Park H. Comparison of conventional lateral cephalograms with corresponding CBCT radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 ; 42(4):201–5.ParkCSParkJKKimHHanSSJeongHGParkH.Comparison of conventional lateral cephalograms with corresponding CBCT radiographs.Imaging Sci Dent.2012;42(4):201–5.Search in Google Scholar
Dillenseger JP, Gros CI, Sayeh A, Rasamimanana J, Lawniczak F, Leminor JM, Matern JF, Constantinesco A, Bornert F, Choquet P. Image quality evaluation of small FOV and large FOV CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017; 46(1):20160285.DillensegerJPGrosCISayehARasamimananaJLawniczakFLeminorJMMaternJFConstantinescoABornertFChoquetP.Image quality evaluation of small FOV and large FOV CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology.Dentomaxillofac Radiol.2017;46(1):20160285.Search in Google Scholar
Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent. 2009; 2009:634567.ScarfeWCLevinMDGaneDFarmanAG.Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics.Int J Dent.2009;2009:634567.Search in Google Scholar
Nalçaci R, Oztürk F, Sökücü O. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39(2):100–6.NalçaciROztürkFSökücüO.A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.Dentomaxillofac Radiol.2010;39(2):100–6.Search in Google Scholar
Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38(5):262–73.ChienPCParksETErasoFHartsfieldJKRobertsWEOfnerS.Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.Dentomaxillofac Radiol.2009;38(5):262–73.Search in Google Scholar
Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR. Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136:460–70GrauerDCevidanesLSProffitWR.Working with DICOM craniofacial images.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2009;136:460–70Search in Google Scholar
Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35: 410—6.PinskyHMDydaSPinskyRWMischKASarmentDP.Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone beam CT.Dentomaxillofac Radiol2006;35:410—6.Search in Google Scholar
Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008; 78:873–9.KumarVLudlowJSoares CevidanesLHMolA.In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.Angle Orthod2008;78:873–9.Search in Google Scholar
Kissel P, Mah JK, Bumann A. Modern 3D cephalometry in pediatric orthodontics-downsizing the FOV and development of a new 3D cephalometric analysis within a minimized large FOV for dose reduction. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25(7):4651–70.KisselPMahJKBumannA.Modern 3D cephalometry in pediatric orthodontics-downsizing the FOV and development of a new 3D cephalometric analysis within a minimized large FOV for dose reduction.Clin Oral Investig.2021;25(7):4651–70.Search in Google Scholar
Felicita AS. A simple three-dimensional stent for proper placement of mini-implant. Progress in orthodontics. 2013; 14:1–2.FelicitaAS.A simple three-dimensional stent for proper placement of mini-implant.Progress in orthodontics.2013;14:1–2.Search in Google Scholar
Felicita AS, Wahab TU. Minimum volume of infiltrative anesthetic required for pain-free placement of mini-implants: a split-mouth clinical trial. Quintessence International. 2023; 54(1):16–22.FelicitaASWahabTU.Minimum volume of infiltrative anesthetic required for pain-free placement of mini-implants: a split-mouth clinical trial.Quintessence International.2023;54(1):16–22.Search in Google Scholar
Li G. Patient radiation dose and protection from cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013; 43(2):63–9.LiG.Patient radiation dose and protection from cone-beam computed tomography.Imaging Sci Dent.2013;43(2):63–9.Search in Google Scholar
Lagrave’re MO, Gordon JM, Guedes IH, Flores-Mir C, Carey JP, Heo G, et al. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 1047–56.Lagrave’reMOGordonJMGuedesIHFlores-MirCCareyJPHeoG.Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.Angle Orthod2009;79:1047–56.Search in Google Scholar
Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34:111–6.KragskovJBoschCGyldenstedCSindet-PedersenS.Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1997;34:111–6.Search in Google Scholar
Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33:291–4.LascalaCAPanellaJMarquesMM.Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).Dentomaxillofac Radiol2004;33:291–4.Search in Google Scholar
Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived three-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008; 78:387–95.PeriagoDRScarfeWCMoshiriMScheetzJPSilveiraAMFarmanAG.Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived three-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.Angle Orthod2008;78:387–95.Search in Google Scholar
Van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Berge’ SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39:156–60.Van VlijmenOJMaalTBerge’SJBronkhorstEMKatsarosCKuijpers-JagtmanAM.A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2010;39:156–60.Search in Google Scholar
Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:430–6.MoreiraCRSalesMALopesPMCavalcantiMG.Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic images.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2009;108:430–6.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136:19–25.BaumgaertelSPalomoJMPalomoLHansMG.Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography dental measurements.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2009;136:19–25.Search in Google Scholar
Chidiac JJ, Shofer FS, Al-Kutoub A, Laster LL, Ghafari J. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002; 5:104–13.ChidiacJJShoferFSAl-KutoubALasterLLGhafariJ.Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging.Orthod Craniofac Res2002;5:104–13.Search in Google Scholar
Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 170–6.CavalcantiMGRochaSSVannierMW.Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.Dentomaxillofac Radiol2004;33:170–6.Search in Google Scholar
Greiner M, Greiner A, Hirschfelder U. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68:290–8.GreinerMGreinerAHirschfelderU.Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.J Orofac Orthop2007;68:290–8.Search in Google Scholar
Van Vlijmen OJC, Berge SJ, Swennen GRJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:92–7.Van VlijmenOJCBergeSJSwennenGRJBronkhorstEMKatsarosCKuijpers-JagtmanAM.Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.J Oral Maxillofac Surg2009;67:92–7.Search in Google Scholar
Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod 2009;79:150–7.BrownAAScarfeWCScheetzJPSilveiraAMFarmanAG.Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.Angle Orthod2009;79:150–7.Search in Google Scholar
Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132:550–60.MoshiriMScarfeWCHilgersMLScheetzJPSilveiraAMFarmanAG.Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone beam computed tomography.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007;132:550–60.Search in Google Scholar
Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshøj M, Melsen B. Comparison between conventional and cone beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134:798–802CattaneoPMBlochCBCalmarDHjortshøjMMelsenB.Comparison between conventional and cone beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2008;134:798–802Search in Google Scholar
Li JL, Kau C, Wang M. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames. Prog Orthod. 2014; 15(1):41.LiJLKauCWangM.Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames.Prog Orthod.2014;15(1):41.Search in Google Scholar
Farronato M, Maspero C, Abate A, Grippaudo C, Connelly ST, Tartaglia GM. 3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(11):6295–302.FarronatoMMasperoCAbateAGrippaudoCConnellySTTartagliaGM.3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements.Eur Radiol.2020;30(11):6295–302.Search in Google Scholar
Nada RM, Maal TJ, Breuning KH, Bergé SJ, Mostafa YA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches. PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e16520.NadaRMMaalTJBreuningKHBergéSJMostafaYAKuijpers-JagtmanAM.Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches.PLoS One.2011;6(2):e16520.Search in Google Scholar
Koerich L, Burns D, Weissheimer A, Claus JD. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45(5):662–9.KoerichLBurnsDWeissheimerAClausJD.Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2016;45(5):662–9.Search in Google Scholar
Gillot M, Miranda F, Baquero B, Ruellas A, Gurgel M, Al Turkestani N, et al. Automatic landmark identification in conebeam computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023.GillotMMirandaFBaqueroBRuellasAGurgelMAl TurkestaniN.Automatic landmark identification in conebeam computed tomography.Orthod Craniofac Res.2023.Search in Google Scholar
Grüning M, Koivisto J, Mah J, Bumann A. Impact of thyroid gland shielding on radiation doses in dental cone beam computed tomography with small and medium fields of view. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022; 134(2):245–53.GrüningMKoivistoJMahJBumannA.Impact of thyroid gland shielding on radiation doses in dental cone beam computed tomography with small and medium fields of view.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol.2022;134(2):245–53.Search in Google Scholar
Ting S, Attaia D, Johnson KB, Kossa SS, Friedland B, Allareddy V, Masoud MI. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?. Angle Orthod 2020; 90(5):655–64.TingSAttaiaDJohnsonKBKossaSSFriedlandBAllareddyVMasoudMI.Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?.Angle Orthod2020;90(5):655–64.Search in Google Scholar
Signorelli L, Patcas R, Peltomäki T, Schätzle M. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop. 2016; 77(1):9–15.SignorelliLPatcasRPeltomäkiTSchätzleM.Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.J Orofac Orthop.2016;77(1):9–15.Search in Google Scholar
El-Beialy AR, Fayed MS, El-Bialy AM, Mostafa YA. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography measurements: Influence of head orientation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140(2):157–65.El-BeialyARFayedMSEl-BialyAMMostafaYA.Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography measurements: Influence of head orientation.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2011;140(2):157–65.Search in Google Scholar
