This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373-78.Search in Google Scholar
Gracco A, Lombardo L, Cozzani M, Siciliani G. Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:361-9.Search in Google Scholar
Park J, Cho HJ. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:314.e1-12.Search in Google Scholar
Fayed M, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2010;80:939-51.Search in Google Scholar
Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:495-503.Search in Google Scholar
Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:779-84.Search in Google Scholar
Miralles R, Hevia R, Contreras L, Carvajal R, Bull R, Manns A. Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types. Angle Orthod 1991;61:277-83.Search in Google Scholar
Rowlerson A, Raoul G, Daniel Y, Close J, Maurage CA, Ferri J et al. Fiber-type differences in masseter muscle associated with different facial morphologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:37-46.Search in Google Scholar
Cha BK, Kim CH, Baek SH. Skeletal sagittal and vertical facial types and electromyographic activity of the masticatory muscle. Angle Orthod 2007;77:463-70.Search in Google Scholar
van den Braber W, van der Bilt A, van der Glas H, Rosenberg T, Koole R. The influence of mandibular advancement surgery on oral function in retrognathic patients: a 5-year follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1237-40.Search in Google Scholar
van den Braber W, van der Glas H, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Masticatory function in retrognathic patients, before and after mandibular advancement surgery.J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:549-54.Search in Google Scholar
Iwase M, Ohashi M, Tachibana H, Toyoshima T, Nagumo M. Bite force, occlusal contact area and masticatory efficiency before and after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:1102-7.Search in Google Scholar
Trawitzki LV, Silva JB, Regalo SC, Mello-Filho FV. Effect of class II and class III dentofacial deformities under orthodontic treatment on maximal isometric bite force. Arch Oral Biol 2011;56:972-6.Search in Google Scholar
English JD, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS. Does malocclusion affect masticatory performance? Angle Orthod 2002;72:21-7.Search in Google Scholar
Picinato-Pirola MN, Mestriner W Jr, Freitas O, Mello-Filho FV, Trawitzki LV. Masticatory efficiency in class II and class III dentofacial deformities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:830-4.Search in Google Scholar
Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Takatsuka S, Yamamoto E, Laskin DM. Comparison of the stress direction on the TMJ in patients with class I, II, and III skeletal relationships. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008;11:43-50.Search in Google Scholar
Henrikson T, Ekberg EC, Nilner M. Masticatory efficiency and ability in relation to occlusion and mandibular dysfunction in girls. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:125-32.Search in Google Scholar
Magalhães IB, Pereira LJ, Marques LS, Gameiro GH. The influence of malocclusion on masticatory performance. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2010;80:981-7.Search in Google Scholar
Yagci A, Veli I, Uysal T, Ucar FI, Ozer T, Enhos S. Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2012;82:67-74.Search in Google Scholar
Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:721.e7-12.Search in Google Scholar
Lim WH, Lee SK, Wikesjo UM, Chun YS. A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: implications of orthodontic mini-implant placement. Clin Anat 2007;20:760-5.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:230-5.Search in Google Scholar
Swasty D, Lee J, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D et al. Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e377-89.Search in Google Scholar
Moon CH, Park HK, Nam JS, Im JS, Baek SH. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:51-7.Search in Google Scholar
Manni A, Cozzani M, Tamborrino F, De Rinaldis S, Menini A. Factors influencing the stability of miniscrews. A retrospective study on 300 miniscrews. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:388-95.Search in Google Scholar
Horner KA, Behrents RG, Kim KB, Buschang PH. Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:170-8.Search in Google Scholar
Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D. The cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone beam computer tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:190-6.Search in Google Scholar
Sato H, Kawamura A, Yamaguchi M, Kasai K. Relationship between masticatory function and internal structure of the mandible based on computed tomography findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:766-73.Search in Google Scholar
Kim HJ, Yun HS, Park HD, Kim DH, Park YC. Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:177-82.Search in Google Scholar
Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:334-40.Search in Google Scholar
Silvestrini-Biavati AS, Tecco S, Migliorati M, Festa F, Marzo G, Gherlone E et al. Three dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:88-99.Search in Google Scholar
Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D et al. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:491-500.Search in Google Scholar
vanEijdenTM. Biomechanics of the Mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000;11:123-36.Search in Google Scholar
Pancherz H. Activity of the temporal and masseter muscles in class II, division 1 malocclusions. An electromyographic investigation. Am J Orthod 1980;77:679-88.Search in Google Scholar
Deguchi T, Kumai T, Garetto L. Statistics of differential Lissajous EMG for normal occlusion and Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:42-8.Search in Google Scholar
Owens S, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Palmer L, English J. Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:602-9.Search in Google Scholar
Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:9-15.Search in Google Scholar
Tozlu M, Nalbantgil D, Öztoprak MO, Özdemir F. A new approach to prevent migration of mini-implants. Turkish J Orthod 2011;24:170-80.Search in Google Scholar
Nalbantgil D, Tozlu M, Oztoprak MO, Ozdemir F, Arun T. FEM Analysis of a new miniplate: stress distribution on the plate, screws and the bone. Eur J Dent 2012;6:9-15.Search in Google Scholar
Tozlu M, Nalbantgil D, Ozdemir F. Effects of a newly designed apparatus on orthodontic skeletal anchorage. Eur J Dent 2013;7:83-88.Search in Google Scholar
