This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrian R. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:120-5.Search in Google Scholar
Othman SA, Harradine NW. Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton’s ratios: a literature review. J Orthod 2006;33:45-51; discussion 29.Search in Google Scholar
Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR, Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001;71:351-7.Search in Google Scholar
Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1958;28:113-30.Search in Google Scholar
Shellhart WC, Lange DW, Kluemper GT, Hicks EP, Kaplan AL. Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions. Angle Orthod 1995;65:327-34.Search in Google Scholar
Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.Search in Google Scholar
Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303.Search in Google Scholar
Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CT. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 2009;25:97-103.Search in Google Scholar
Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803.Search in Google Scholar
Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5.Search in Google Scholar
Lowey MN. The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system: Part I. Br J Orthod 1993;20:203-14.Search in Google Scholar
Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi VA, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod 2000;70:303-7.Search in Google Scholar
Horton HM, Miller JR, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models. Angle Orthod 2010;80:254-61.Search in Google Scholar
Buschang PH, Ceen RF, Schroeder JN. Holographic storage of dental casts. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:308-11.Search in Google Scholar
Rossouw PE, Benatar M, Stander I, Wynchank S. A critical comparison of three methods for measuring dental models. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1991;46:223-6.Search in Google Scholar
Takada K, Lowe AA, DeCou R. Operational performance of the Reflex Metrograph and its applicability to the three-dimensional analysis of dental casts. Am J Orthod 1983;83:195-9.Search in Google Scholar
Romeo A, Canal F, Roma M, de la Higuera B, Ustrell JM, von Arx JD. Holograms in orthodontics: a universal system for the production, development, and illumination of holograms for the storage and analysis of dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:443-7.Search in Google Scholar
Keating PJ, Parker RA, Keane D, Wright L. The holographic storage of study models. Br J Orthod 1984;11:119-25.Search in Google Scholar
Champagne M. Reliability of measurements from photocopies of study models. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:648-50.Search in Google Scholar
Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:676-80.Search in Google Scholar
Ho CT, Freer TJ. The graphical analysis of tooth width discrepancy. Aust Orthod J 1994;13:64-70.Search in Google Scholar
Mok KH, Cooke MS. Space analysis: a comparison between sonic digitization (DigiGraph Workstation) and the digital caliper. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:653-61.Search in Google Scholar
Normando D, da Silva PL, Mendes AM. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:721-6.Search in Google Scholar
Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata K. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:365-9.Search in Google Scholar
Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:263-74.Search in Google Scholar
Lu P, Li Z, Wang Y, Chen J, Zhao J. The research and development of noncontact 3-D laser dental model measuring and analyzing system. Chin J Dent Res 2000;3:7-14.Search in Google Scholar
Hirogaki Y, Sohmura T, Satoh H, Takahashi J, Takada K. Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:1093-101.Search in Google Scholar
Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J, Noar JH. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 2012;39:151-9.Search in Google Scholar
Ayoub AF, Wray D, Moos KF, Jin JR, Niblett TB, Urquhart C et al. A three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study casts: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1997;12:79-84.Search in Google Scholar
Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 2003;30:219-23.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM, Hassan R, Townsend GC. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study. Aust Orthod J 2012;28:22-9.Search in Google Scholar
Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:346-52.Search in Google Scholar
