This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Knoll M, Gwinnett AJ, Wolff MS. Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. Am J Orthod 1986; 89:476–9.Search in Google Scholar
Banks P, Macfarlane TV. Bonded versus banded first molar attachments: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthod 2007;34:128–36; discussion 111–12.Search in Google Scholar
Millett DT, Hallgren A, Fornell AC, Robertson M. Bonded molar tubes: a retrospective evaluation of clinical performance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:667–74.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Hussey DL, Mitchell CA. Bonding to molars – the effect of etch time (an in vitro study). Eur J Orthod 1998;20:195–9.Search in Google Scholar
Maijer R, Smith DC. Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases. Am J Orthod 1981;79:20–34.Search in Google Scholar
Regan D, van Noort R. Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foilmesh. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:144–53.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston CD, McSherry PF. The effects of sandblasting on the bond strength of molar attachments: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:311–17.Search in Google Scholar
Millett DT, Letters S, Roger E, Cummings A, Love J. Bonded molar tubes: an in vitro evaluation. Angle Orthod 2001;71:380–5.Search in Google Scholar
Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DD, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:65–70.Search in Google Scholar
MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foilmesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113: 276–81.Search in Google Scholar
Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333–40.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:616–20.Search in Google Scholar
Cozza P, Martucci L, Toffol LD, Penco SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:851–6.Search in Google Scholar
Matasa CG, Eng C, Sci T. Buccal tube’s bond strength: a comparison reveals unexpected differences. Orthod Mat Insider 2009;21:1–8.Search in Google Scholar
Jaffer S, Oesterle LJ, Newman SM. Storage media effect on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:83–6.Search in Google Scholar
Patrick RL, Minford JD. Treatise on Adhesion and Adhesives. In: Raton B, ed. CRC Press, 1991:337–8.Search in Google Scholar
Ruyter IE, Oysaed H. Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1982;40:179–92.Search in Google Scholar
Gronberg K, Rossouw PE, Miller BH, Buschang P. Distance and time effect on shear bond strength of brackets cured with a second-generation light-emitting diode unit. Angle Orthod 2006;76:682–8.Search in Google Scholar
Bennett AW, Watts DC. Performance of two blue light-emitting-diode dental light curing units with distance and irradiation-time. Dent Mater 2004;20:72–9.Search in Google Scholar
Oesterle LJ, Messersmith ML, Devine SM, Ness CF. Light and setting times of visible-light-cured orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:31–6.Search in Google Scholar
Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. Effect of tacking time on bond strength of light-cured adhesives. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:449–53.Search in Google Scholar
Murray SD, Hobson RS. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:2–9.Search in Google Scholar
